Increase the Spin - Final vote tally (Kebir Blue)

"Vote yes if you agree.
The number of game months on all worlds should equal 6 per real day."


The final vote tally

Yes 28 70%
No 12 30%
---
Total 40

*sighs

Im trying to recall a vote you have started, that was for the good of the game
and not your own selfish ends.......................................................................That'll be a no then

no

This is for the good of the game. Speeds up gameplay.

...and 27 players agreed with me on this proposal.

You Yoda and 11 others disagreed.

Are you for real?

not e1 is available to play 6 updates a day.
How is that good for the game?

All the vote tells us is 38 ppl could be bothered to look up the vote page.

"not e1 is available to play 6 updates a day."

So then increase the blackout periods if thats your concern.

What the hell have blackouts got to do with you wanting 6 updates?

Im talking workers, corps etc.

war hasnt been mentioned once


I can see it now...Maestro logs in and has missed 4 updates cos of work....



Ppl of simcountry i have started a new vote.
Through massive worker shortages and the need to close corps we need to go back to
less spins a day.
Thank you for listening
Maestro2000(biggest **** in sc )

assuming Maestro doesn't work the bar at the local Karaoke place and has his trusty laptop on the counter.

Meastro = greedy. He's war level 0 on all worlds, pays for no war protection and wants even more from the game. Right.

When I'm done... they'll remove war levels. Sooner hopefully more than later. Then Maestro will learn to play the game instead of crab off it.

Greed Wendy? Are you looking in the mirror?

War levels are good for the game. We just need more players....New players.

No I'm looking at you.

You have war level zero on every world, two ceos on every world, and you make decent money. The only incentive and motivation for you to push for more spins on all worlds is you get paid more rollover in a day. Duuh Losing!

Now when I look at myself I see that I do many things you could but won't ever do.

I have paid for War protection on LU for at least 6-8 countries every single month for more than a year. You don't. Did the same on GR last year.

I buy weapons for random purposes. You don't. Even if you do, it is to make a dollar, not to defend anything.

See I make money, and I spend a lot of it and put it back into the game. You just crab, PERIOD.

I don't cry for cheaper war protection like you do, even though hands down, I have paid for more war protection than maybe any other player in this game, possibly ever. If not the most, the first player place coul

I noticed a number of players posting on the board looking for more spin, so I put it up for a vote. 70% voted yes (28 out of 40 players)

In my simcountry career I have paid plenty for WP. (A boatload)

There's a lot of players want no war restrictions back...you gonna put a vote up for that too?

Maestro,

Pertaining to your statement,
"War levels are good for the game. We just need more players....New players."

I, also, who have played the eco side of the game, disagree. War levels are stupid and prohibitive, especially on the war world. The ability to play a friendly economic game was put in place to those who didn't want to be bothered by war. So if you want no war, play peaceful. Simple as that.

This game in my opinion to sustain and offer full advantages needs to lift the war level restrictions. I think you will see that most players do not like the war levels in place. I have paid my share of WP over the years, and have never complained.

I like the 'federation' concept. You want protection, you want unification, you want to learn.... join a fed. If you don't want to fight, then just set up air defense to contribute and help your fed in boosting their economies. The war l

If they removed wp then would that count for free players to or just ones that pay? I play for free and am part of a fed. If Wp is taken off I should be allowed to fight with my fed aganist other presidents what is the point if I am forced to sit on the sodelines and watch my fed lose if it comes to that . For people that pay the GC you get should be advantage enough.

Free players shouldnt be allowed to war PvP.

WG should be 3 months
KB/GR should be 4 months
FB should be 5months
LU should be 6months.

If you want WG to compete with LU double its production..... Leave time as is

On FB world, the war world they have unrestricted war. War Level 3 and above.

So just get some more people interested in the game and this conversation goes away.

how does e1 sat at under war lvl 3 allow a war game to be played? regardless of the world.

more ppl = more sat at war lvl 0

Simple answer.. do away with war restriction and re introduce WP as it used to be.
Those that dont want war buy WP.

War lvls i have no problem with them, ppl can learn basic war.

Do a better job of talking to new players and they will join the ranks of war level 3 players on FB world and other worlds.

Send them the links for player simcountry websites.
Send them free advice on how to better their econ.
Send them advice on how to take a C3.
Send them advice on basic warfare.

Pointing a finger at me is a waste of time.

We are all here for our imagine time.

Start imagining a strategy to add 50 new war level 3 players every month on each world. Them implement the plan. You can do it.

LOL have you seen how many FB players are under war lvl 3?

Maestro, get a grip dude

War has all but been eliminated

Maestro takes too many drugs...

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

In my simcountry career I have paid plenty for WP. (A boatload) ~Maestro<!-/Quote-!>

And there you go, when you did it was keeping your GC stash at bay wasn't it? And then you screamed for cheaper War Protection. A self serving request. Which points us back at your request for more spins on ALL worlds.

If people loved more spins more people would go to LU. if LU filled up, you'd have a realistic expectation to speed another world to 6 months per day. Until then, a blanket move for all worlds is unwarranted when there are some people want to play slower.

Maestro, this game isn't just about you. You did a nice job of trying to make this look like an everyone issue. No duuh, people do like playing 6 months that is why LU is so popular. But if everyone like

Hey I'm not the only person who voted for the increased spin.

As far as name goes, my game name has never changed and my ceo names are still the same.

I fail to see why free's shouldn't be allowed to engage in PVP combat. The free countries already don't have nukes so we are behind the eight ball in that regard. There are more effective ways to ensure that free players aren't just flooding in to create war. Like having a mandortory active period (2-3 months realtime) before being able to declare war on another player this would ensure that the player would have at least somewhat a good understanding of the game and the politics that play into his or her world. A second option would be to give the SC some "teeth" and actually make them a threat to rouge countries.