| Matt Patton (Golden Rainbow) | Friday, September 16, 2011 - 11:06 pm 
best price is 100 Q
rock bottom never use
fixed any Q not 100 limit at 200 Q need a calculator for this one or go over and use that |
| Quetzalcoatl | Friday, September 16, 2011 - 11:14 pm
I read somewhere that in order to understand you someone needed a mattpatton dictionary, i for sure do not understand what your trying to say. |
| Matt Patton (Golden Rainbow) | Friday, September 16, 2011 - 11:17 pm
what I am saying is you sell 200Q stuff for best price you will loose lots of money
best price will not sell at quality |
| Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue) | Friday, September 16, 2011 - 11:48 pm
oh, than why not say it like that, becuase the way you phrased it i did not understand. |
| Jonni Gil | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 12:46 pm
I think it does follow quality but we'll do some extra tests quickly and find out. Thanks for noticing |
| Garry Freeman (White Giant) | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 07:47 pm
thanks Matt for tip. will adjust corps to test. must sharpen english so we understand what you say. then avoid threads complaining your use of language. we wont mind you writing text out full |
| Tom Willard | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 09:22 pm
When you offer Q200, the trading process tries to find a match at Q200.
There is no guarantee that anyone wants to buy your products at this price.
If impossible to match, the price might be a little lower.
You receive let's say 1.8, the buyer wanted 1.5 and pays 1.8 and the product is delivered at Q180.
In many cases, the trading procedure is participating and adding money for you.
This is partially phased out and will disappear.
I most cases, the requested price is higher than the product quality would suggest.
In these cases, differences are larger and products also remain unsold. |
| Matt Patton (Golden Rainbow) | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 10:03 pm
how about you ditch rock bottom and add quality price
don't know why anyone would want to sell at rock bottom anyway |
| David Walker (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 11:11 pm
When you want to get rid of something very quickly, one uses "rock bottom". I have in the past used, and it's a handy tool. |
| Matt Patton (Golden Rainbow) | Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 11:18 pm
reasons I want to sell off to market
1. buy nuclear sell electric no wait time
2. buy some other good low wait sell high
3. acquire a company buy all expensive stuff sell to market
4. close down a company but can't sell to another one |
| Noproblem (Fearless Blue) | Friday, September 23, 2011 - 05:47 am
Tom,
"In many cases, the trading procedure is participating and adding money for you.
This is partially phased out and will disappear."
The system whereby you make up the difference between bid quality and sell quality has added a great deal of stability to the markets. I really would like you to reconsder making this function totally disappear.
Thank you for all your hard work! |
| David Walker (Little Upsilon) | Friday, September 23, 2011 - 06:11 am
I don't think the game should be subsidising anything. If only high quality products are available then that is what should be bought.
I have argued in the past that there should be stages of production with varying levels of quality that build up the production chain to the consumer products which are preferred by the population at the highest quality. |
| Crafty (Fearless Blue) | Friday, September 23, 2011 - 04:37 pm
Top class product requires top class materials.
You can't make a silk purse from a pigs ear. |
| Noproblem (Fearless Blue) | Sunday, September 25, 2011 - 09:52 am
But you cannot actually order items above 250 q on the market. Who will sell items above that q if there is no quality subsidy? That is why it's there. Then the only way to sell above 250 q would be by contract, or by market orders with no quality restrictions. And who orders that way? |
