Question to the GM about newest polls (Little Upsilon)

5. Redo corp worker levels Status: Please read our response [ top ]
Detailed Description:
There use to be corps(food/agriculture/mining) that never needed High tech workers and they become valuable to economies to prevent an overabundance of Low-high level workers. I would like to ask the GM to look into either reducing the amount of techies needed or bring back some of these corps. Some of the highest level corps use to many techies leaving a lot of workers in the dust and unable to be used. Space shuttle corps use 32K engineers but 60K High tech seniors. This is much to many to be sustainable. Also a Factory main unit corp starts needing 73K engineers when upgraded uses 100K Plus (30% of all workers in that corp are engineers alone). These high numbers drain the techies of a nation and leave large amounts of Low-high level workers. This reducing income(they take SS) and lowers employment ratings and with a lot of L

I disagree on both points.

If you want the very hi-tech corps because they make large profits then expect to use lots of hi tech staff. You should work out the return per $ salary paid. If you think its unbalanced, dont build that type of corp...simples. Beside, the education system will accomodate these corps without leaving loads of unskilled. More often than not my problem is insufficient low workers.

Secondly, a certain amount of reality is nice to maintain. In the case of these weapons, no where are they off the shelf! countries have to make deals (sneaky back hand deals or otherwise) to obtain these weapons, or build their own. You can buy a box of shotgun shells down the road, but ICBMs are a bit rarer. Conventional missile batts and missiles are actually considered as strategic weapons in this game, see the weapons docs. So, if anything, more weapons should be available only on contract, direct trade (or space

lmao @ diamond geezer

Well atleast, give SuperSoldier some credits for trying his best, he deserves it.

Anthony.