Changes in the war game

I'm being completely wiped out by c3's. This is my second attempt I looked at the changes and I should be doing better not worse. Is there anything else not mentioned, that I'm missing that is tearing me up?

Your attack has been launched. The The Democratic Union of Lozona forces lost 14 anti aircraft missile batteries, 14 missile interceptor batteries, 14 defensive missile batteries, 16 armored vehicles, 16 jeeps, 16 artillery and 16 tanks. The Democratic Union of Lozona forces used 21 missile interceptors in the defense. The Democratic Union of Lozona lost 135 soldiers and 320 were wounded. The unit Kane of Dalmasca lost 670 heavy tanks. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Kane lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Dalmasca lost 873 soldiers and 2653 were wounded. The Democratic Union of Lozona defense was assisted by the Westgate and Garrison TG3133 unit.


This makes no sense to me at all. 21 intercepters only

heavy tanks and artillery don't stand up very well against...well, any thing.


clear the air defense, and garison before using the cheap tank ammo to destroy targets.

mrmb/ooamb to take out air d

mrmb/ht or mrmb/ha, for lower war levels, and high q fighting, 800 tanks or artillery, rest mrmb, use just the mrmb to clear the target, then just the tanks to destroy it.

i some times use an mrmb only, just to have a mass of weapons for hard to reach targets.

money says there was a heli wing still up

you could be right, but those lt and la tear apart ht and ha, i mean, that is a lop sided battle

You should look into the weapons document and you will see which weapons are most effective in attacking such a target.
I think that offensive missile batteries would be more effective against these installations and it seems that you have used heavy tanks.

The quality of your units and the ammunition is also a very important factor and can change everything.

Not when attacking targets andy

Its still the same i use 300Q fighting units of 1000tanks/art (2000weapons in total) and it still takes 2attacks on targets to destroy them im sure its not us with the wrong weapons. When it takes 2000weapons mult attacks costing us what?

70,000shells per attack @ 300K per shell= 22.5B per attack.

Not being rude, but I know of much better ways to piss away 45B to destroy a city. Plus the amount of cash gained per each war level is pathetically sad, Players should gain 2 if not 3T per war level. I see no reason why war level 11 should not give 20T + cash.

I mean level 7 i get 8T.

15cities+ 20factories+ 40forts= 75targets
75targets * 23B per attack= 1.75T(this is based everything goes down with 1attack which in cities and forts isnt the case)

Not counting the weapons i lose which is prob what another 3-4T.
I MAKE A WHOOPING 2T cash&#

I don't have any problems taking c3s but I doubt I do it in the most effective manner, though it is quick.

The Democratic Union of Lozona defense was assisted by the Westgate and Garrison TG3133 unit.

Westgate is probably a heli wing.

Thanks a lot of everybody.

I have specifically crafted each unit to do different things and before the update my team killed on a Level3 i was looking at maybe 2.2-2.3T profit. That's why i was curious if I was missing something. I never had to destroy the units on the map before. I think I tried when I was a noob and it didn't seem to hit anything. But I got to evolve in the war game so thanks for that. And redo some math, I think when I configured my units I was usig out of date unit statistics the sheet I was using said heavy artillery had a range of 800 so I knew it was wrong.

Alright so how do you attack helicopter wings. No losses on their side, and loses to my mid range missile batteries?

I destroyed the airports but the air units are still able to defend.

hit the heli wings where they sit on the ground. FP or bomb 'em, I would.

You can also drag them out with a wing of navy fighter planes and one cruise missile ship. They respond to the missile and the NFP kill 'em. But I'm not sure thats so cool nowadays as you cant upgrade navy stuff so take big losses. Just a couple of heli wings would be ok though. Lol, I destroyed nearly 1 million helis in one sitting that way once in a PvP when navy fighting was very effective.

Crafty, you look a little toooooo pink for my tastes. Wut's up with that discolored leg??? I'm very concerned about you, old man.

Oh, the leg...well, its a touch of incontinence, happens at my age...

I thought that might be the issue. I'll keep my distance. ha ha ha ha :S

similar to bomber/fighters to take out ints, use mrmb/oaamb

I used to find the OAAMB pretty much useless Orbiter. Are they more effective now if they are of high Q?

Crafty, yes, try using MRMB with the OAAMB, just like you would to take out ints... you'll bypass the ints entirely. making cruise and ground good with out going through endless piles of interceptors.

i guess i'll really regret saying that when helis and hm go wildly red on every planet. lol, some how i'm not so worried.

you should be worried, Josias, VERY worried.

lol, if you are who i think you are, then i only have Little bit to worry about

Dont get caught in that web Orbiter or she'll bite and suck out all your life juices leaving a dried out shell of your former self dangling in the wind, where a flea bitten bat will eat you whole and poo you out on the inaccesible top of some remote volcano where you will be encased in 1100 degree lava to remain for the next 65 million years.

I wish I had spidey powers.

Yeah, yeah, Josias....what Crafty said! lol And, I WILL be a force to be reckoned with...right after YOU teach me how to fight, tyvm. :P

aww, your right, some times its just best to pass by