| Drew | Sunday, November 4, 2012 - 03:10 am 
In fact demand has seemed to edge off massively across the board for these high value corps. It makes it much harder to use many investing functions when corp values are so high. Example, Arcadian Medical Energies_ Valued at 6,380,671.98M SC$ profit is a mere 613.50M SC$ profit high on the graph is only 868MSC$.
To spend 638B to gain 10% would yield only 86M if the HIGH was constant. If PT was 100% unlikely the payoff would take 7133.72 months or 594.48 years with 0 chance for making a solid return resale. That is also skewing the numbers positively for the investor.
The point is if no one is willing to pay for shares in the company then the price has no bearing to get that in the first place, as a share is only worth the price the last exchange was willing to pay for it. Unfunctionable and the price seems to rise even higher. 500$ per share? |
| Samsin Valiga | Sunday, November 4, 2012 - 09:31 pm
drew its a game get over it...plus the gm has better things to do like make space shuttles |
| Drew | Monday, November 5, 2012 - 02:56 am
The particular corp in the example is now exceeding 7T Market Value. And profits are down 100M since the last time I looked.
I'm not making too much over it this is the first time I brought it up. If they are going to make changes to the IF's to make them more functional then this is merely a move in the wrong direction. The goal here is simply to put it out there. |
