 |
|
|
|
Thursday, November 7, 2013 - 01:38 pm  To date, there are no weapons that can damage or destroy a space center. in the near future, it will become possible. If a space center is destroyed, all contents will be destroyed. It will not be easy to do. it will be possible to protect it forcefully and any such change will be announced ahead of time.
| |
| Saturday, November 9, 2013 - 12:43 am lol to many peeps been hiding stuff here anyways OH THE EYES haven been given all the info, ITS SO COLD AND I'LL PARTY IF WE CHOOSE TOO..............party on fools!
| |
| Saturday, November 9, 2013 - 09:52 pm and the next step, would be charging CEO's the same monthly upkeep for their stashed weapon and ammo, and then war will be a just a memory in SC. Wait, what would be the difference?
| |
| Saturday, November 9, 2013 - 10:41 pm may be to encourage players to go save their goods in space, would be to allow players to own space stations then? until w3c comes up with the space war stuffs, that things can be destroy in space stations too? for now, why not just make it that the most powerful weapon in sc can destroy a space center, such as one strategic bomb can destroy a space center? this would be more realistic 
| |
| Sunday, November 10, 2013 - 12:40 am How about space fighters and battle cruisers while were at it..
| |
| Sunday, November 10, 2013 - 01:03 am Wraith reporting in... BATTLE-CRUISER OPERATIONAL
| |
| Sunday, November 10, 2013 - 01:44 am Death Star No.... a FLEET of DEATH STARS !!!
| |
| Sunday, November 10, 2013 - 02:38 am borg queen would probably like a fleet of death stars for her drones
| |
| Sunday, November 10, 2013 - 04:39 am omg... you can not mix star wars and star trek... thats just sick.
| |
| Wednesday, November 13, 2013 - 12:46 am here's a thought, players whom have built stuff up over the years and stored it in different area's within the game over the years finally find all their real life investment within in a game all screwed up and now possible to being lost for good..........well WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD FOOLS......you guys think you could hide AND DO whatever unto us as a player forever......the EYES ARE COMING FOR YER
| |
| Wednesday, November 13, 2013 - 05:22 am Borg Queen would build a cube and annihilate us all
| |
| Monday, November 18, 2013 - 10:08 pm Funny. You are scared to death of any change that might expand the war features to include space centers and then predict the end of the war game. the end of the war game was predicted from day one of this game and we have a millions wars since then. And yes, we think that all types of objects should participate in the war game and defend themselves if they want to. we also think that war should be extended to space and that space should provide with special economic advantages if you play that part.
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 03:46 am Andy are ceo's ever going to be involved in the war game other than just to stash arms? As in paying maintenance or attackable in some way?
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 03:51 am what are you suggesting erin?
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 03:59 am not suggesting anything... just asking a question..
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 06:03 am Andy there has never in history been a million wars in this game and c3 wars do not count
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 06:27 am I am all for this update. I would also like to see a physical location for all items in the game that can be attacked in a war. People, myself included, store thousands upon thousands of weapons in a CEO, and it is perfectly protected, because it doesn't exist until it gets transferred out of the CEO. My suggestion is that all physical goods MUST have a physical location in a country to be stored. High defense countries can "rent" space to CEOs if they wish. Lets expand the game, and add some risk.
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 03:15 pm That would be really cool.
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 09:23 pm I don't know which country my enterprise space center is located in. That would be nice I guess. I would like to see better econ development. There is so much effort expended on the war aspect to the detriment of the econ side of things. Much real world conflict is economic in nature. Real competition in the econ arena would be a cool feature.
| |
| Tuesday, November 19, 2013 - 09:44 pm yeah i cant even nationalize corps anymore so im just getting rammed by CEOs.... not much of a fight and secured mode doesnt protect me
| |
| Wednesday, November 20, 2013 - 03:12 pm You cannot nationalize corporations? can you please describe what happens, message etc. we would like to look into it and solve it immediately if there is a problem.
| |
| Wednesday, November 20, 2013 - 08:02 pm Just leave the products stashing alone people.
| |
| Thursday, November 21, 2013 - 04:59 am I do not stash products. I stock my inventory for I trade on the misery and death of others aspiring only to sell the weapons of destruction to each side. Ahh, to profit from the evil that lurks in the hearts of men.
| |
| Thursday, November 21, 2013 - 05:01 am my guess is thewhy already hit the cap of nationalized corps in his nation(s)
| |
| Thursday, November 21, 2013 - 05:28 am You have to be a Premium Member in order to nationalize corporations. It used to be a Free Member feature a while ago.
| |
| Friday, November 22, 2013 - 03:51 am There are two types of nationalization in this game which is confusing the discussion... Erin is thinking of the feature that allows me to nationalize state corps (which makes no sense really because state corps are national corps) in this sort of nationalization you go to a state corp and click "nationalize this corporation" and bam it says status changed..... but when i go to a public corp that is being held in my country by a hostile CEO in place of the button that says "nationalize corporation" it says "If you are unsatisfied with its performance, you can nationalize it if you are Premium Member."......... this sort of nationalization rather then putting the corporation in the status of "nationalized" forcibly purchases the "major shareholders" shares..... there has never been the option for a country to purchase shares of corps either in the country or beyond its borders... this nationlization feauture allowed me to protect my corps from CEOs who buy up shares of my truly public corps but now i cant i assume because new players who acquired a c3 couldnt just takeover CEOs corps... unfortunately CEOs are now doing the same to me 
| |
| Friday, November 22, 2013 - 03:54 am amazing how confusing all this business becomes
| |
| Saturday, November 23, 2013 - 02:30 am Andy Is there any chance of the GM looking into updating the space pages. AS it stands if i want to move assets around i have to click them 1 at a time and go though EACH item one by one. In the next update can the GM do something to where i can click 5-6 items at once and have them all sent to where i want them rather then having to do them one at a time?
| |
| Sunday, November 24, 2013 - 12:07 am Andy do you have any comments on the nationalization problem... i dont think its right that a CEO can take over a countrys public corps without any action that can be taken by players
| |
| Sunday, November 24, 2013 - 10:31 am Presidents can block CEOs from taking over corporations in their countries. it is a setting. It is absolutly wrong to do so but added after many requests by players some years ago. The best you can have is private and public corporations in your country, they contribute most. The best countries have only such corporations. you just need to make sure they can be successful by making sure education works and by increasing the welfare in the country.
| |
| Sunday, November 24, 2013 - 08:14 pm Andy you are not understanding me..... as you know state corps can upgrade to 200 private corps to 225 and public corps up to 250.... therefore public corps are indeed the best.... but i like to control my own economy this means that i use Country controlled public corps.... i have run private economies before and they were inflexible and mediocre.,... in order to get the 250 upgrade level you must sell to under 25% ownership (you cannot buy shares with your IF either).... YES you can block CEOs but that setting does NOTHING.... it prevents CEOs from requesting constructions and relocations of private corps but i can just deny those requests when they come in i dont need to block them.... its not worth my time to go click the box because it doesnt do anything.... the thing im worried about is some asshole CEO buying a 30% ownership of my corps sending the upgrade down to 225 and giving them control of my economy...... now Andy let me ask you what happens when an enemy of mine makes a multi CEO gets a bunch of loans and buys up shares of my public corps and sets production to 10%.... my country is ruined thats what happens i cant buy the corps back through nationalization or just regular buying of shares and i cant force them to move or close the corps through "blocking CEOs"..... look at my country https://sim03.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/cgiw?ownedcompanies&miCountryName=RESPUBLICAARDGLASS 11 of my fully upgraded corps have been taken over by CEOs one of them has been set to 10% hiring and production what am i supposed to do andy? are free players forever confined to unprofitable state corps or whoring their economy out to CEOs who consistently close and move corps aswell as changing salaries not to mention it takes a long time to get many corps from CEOs in the first place and remember "blocking CEOs" does nothing you could probably just remove the feature and give players more time to accept and reject requests.... we need a nationalization feature (for public corps) or we need the ability to buy shares of corps located within the country
| |
| Monday, November 25, 2013 - 10:36 pm XON: "the posts by gm and info in the docs simply says that public corps are better than private corps, so you must ipo your corps to share the wealth" I explained many times that if you do not like CEOs you can block them.
| |
| Monday, November 25, 2013 - 11:19 pm you cant block ceos form taking over public companies andy.... there is no point to blocking requests because you can reject them when they come in.
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 12:07 am The setting helps a lot. not players who are checking every day but others, who do not want to be there all the time to prevent CEOs from taking their corporations. <25% share holding is risky as intended. many make this happen but corporations can be taken over. countries can be taken over too. Not risc is no game. we love these truly public corporations and will keep it exactly as it is. We will also prevent countries from trading in shares in corporations they do not control. this is the priviledge of the enterprises and each player can have two. many have more, in multiple worlds. You may not like this features and others may not like other features. There is no point in talking about it for ever as it will not change.
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 12:48 am thats funny andy because a month ago you said you were introducing a feature to allow us to buy shares of corps located in our country.... why the change of heart?....
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 02:03 am Andy, that is a threat to you. Kick him off the game
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 02:59 am Nico you're a pest nothing more nothing less
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 03:22 am And you are a noob. Nothing more nothing less
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 11:55 pm No change of heart at all. it is a misunderstanding on my part. you can purchase shares in corporations you control. you cannnot purchase shares in corporations you do not control.
| |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 11:57 pm CEO can take corporations from one another. that is part of their game. presidents can stay out of it and keep all their corporations in their own hands.
| |
| Wednesday, November 27, 2013 - 02:25 am a misunderstanding on your part? can you elaborate? that sounds nice and dandy but it neglects the fact that state corporations are unprofitable as they are profitable
|
