Simcountry
Forum General Clean Power!

Clean Power!

E
Eugene Mac

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 02:47Link
I would like the be the first to make a call for clean power in Simcountry! My power plants use oil for fuel. How not-green! At least we could move to gas, with its lower carbon footprint, or how about hydro-power! I call for solar cells on every home and government building! Ships will harness the power of whales and dolphins to travel the seas! The demand for oil plunge to an all time low and prices will fall to record lows. The air will be clear and peace and goodwill will abound in the world. Love will conquer the land!

Come, find this dream with me!
J
John West

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 03:14Link
The only reason you can't run your car entirely on hydrogen gas is the compression ratio is not designed for the higher combustibility, specifically the pistons need not depress as far as they would for gasoline/diesel. Oil production and logistics is carefully controlled and as such easily rigged.

Now we have hydrogen fuel cells which are simply nothing more than lightly electrically charged metal plates where hydrogen gas contacts fresh air, and the hydrogen gas combines with the oxygen in the air along the charged metal plates so that hydrogen and oxygen molecularly fuse together and produce a very strong electrical discharge where h2o goes out the exhaust, just as it would if you burnt hydrogen in a combustion engine as well.

Seeing as how Simcountry takes place in the future, it makes no sense that there is a power industry at all because in reality hydrogen can be created through an embarrassingly simple process called electrolys
E
Eugene Mac

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 13:14Link
Since I am employed in an industrial that supports power systems, I must state a few facts.
Hydrogen is less energetic than natural gas or liquid fuels. Thus you need more hydrogen than say natural gas to run anything.
Also water is a very stable form of hydrogen. Thus, breaking it up to hydrogen and oxygen and then recombining it to water is actually a net energy loss. This means you would be better off using the electricity from the solar panels. Add to that the fact that internal combustion engines loose a lot of energy from heat and you would have a lot fewer losses using the solar energy.

My post was just motivated by power plant using oil. As a side, the number of employees at one station is about the same as all power plant employees in the US making thousands of time as much power - they are very inefficient :)
A
Andy

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 17:39Link
We intend to add wind and sun energy.
These corporations will be added but we do want to add incentives for players to use them and we will also add coal generators.
Very polluting but also in the real world they are used a lot and pollute a lot.

As we are in the future, should we consider fusion?

We do have nuclear power and we see many times that its price is much lower than oil generated power but it is not bought.
It could be bought and sold on the market for a much higher price.

I agree, the number of workers is huge and will be reduced.

Numbers of workers are very high to prevent the number of corporations from exploding, making the game too difficult and processing very long and complex.
Z
Zen

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 19:50Link
Would wind and solar energy become electric power in the end? Some players buy nuclear energy as an alternative to electric power because it is cheaper, but countries don't consume nuclear power or buy it automatically. The nuclear power turns into electric power, as the only power source countries and corporations consume. Would solar and wind power just be more to add towards electric power as a whole? Will countries start consuming wind, solar, coal and nuclear energy separately? Better yet could countries and corporations set a ratio for these power sources in order to get the cheapest/most efficient power sources. Of course that would need to have pollution added as a penalty.

Pollution could effect the welfare of a country/corporation. A highly polluted country where most of its power is generated/bought from coal, and natural gas would have negative points towards country welfare, and people would die younger and more often from exposur
J
John West

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 20:01Link
I believe that solar power, whether through solar panels or even heating water with mirrors or glass (if that counts??) could be a highly profitable industry with enough panels installed. The issue would be expensive start up costs, but once set up the energy is . . mostly free (free during day, yet massive amounts of batteries would have to be switched out regularly however to supply power at night).

Wind power on the other hand will NEVER be profitable. Wind turbines require several gallons of diesel fuel from generators to get the turbines started turning, and believe me when I say that the wind is not always blowing. Wind power also has the "NIMBY" (not-in-my-back-yard) issue that wind turbines are extremely noisy.

I do not think wind power will EVER get off the ground.

I am all for solar power plants though. I think the energy should be sold as Solar Power commodity and stored as Electric Power
Z
Zen

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 20:03Link
@John West they would need to have some drawback however. Sadly at the moment country land mass has nothing to do with anything other than war painting. You can cram 300 million population in a 1 mile radius..
J
John West

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 20:06Link
Zen, I think pollution/smog is an interesting idea. Nuclear power does not contribute to this but there are slight radiation leak from nuclear power plants. Perhaps this could very slightly increase death rates of populations.

Jonni mentioned fusion, but then there would be no need for power companies because I would assume by the year three thousand whatever that everybody would have fusion generators the size of a desktop computer to power buildings and vehicles. I had actually thought this before mentioning hydrogen in my first post, but I figured I would just explain a simple and effective technology that we can all grasp rather than mention a more advanced technology (cold fusion) that I believe will soon become a reality in the "21st century."

With nothing more than water access (a well or water condensator like a radiator, air conditioner or dehumidifier for example), a solar panel, a copper wire (multipl
M
Michael

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 20:40Link
how about having alternatives in the game like wind power or better yet solar power? Corporations could make panels and other items for solar power.
M
Michael

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 20:41Link
Fusion power is an excellent suggestion
J
John West

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 21:10Link
Fusion (or hydrogen) power would mean no need for power companies. Everything useful eventually gets scaled down to consumer level with time. I would expect the same by the year three thousand something.

Instead of power companies, we could have fusion power generator companies though. That would probably be a highly profitable industry.

Car, truck and construction companies would require a supply of fusion power generators for vehicles and buildings.

We do not need to assume though that technology always improves in the future. Perhaps some technologies are gained and lost due to cataclysmic events. I would assume however that due to populations being decentralized by occupying several worlds that this would not be an issue, unless the entire star system were affected by cataclysmic event(s) such as asteroid collisions, wars, pandemics, financial collapses, etc.

and so it's really up to the GMs what t
E
Eugene Mac

All worlds
26 Aug 2016 22:57Link
One option might be if your country produces cheaper power (like fusion) then it uses more of it (people love cheap power). This would increase the need for more power-plants and fusion power plants would be expensive. They also use a lot of water, but that isn't a commodity in the game at the moment. The other option is that they would use a lot of machine parts and services (the fusion power creates steam which runs steam turbines which spins generators, all of which need to be maintained).

I was originally just thinking about letting power plants chose which fuel they use - oil, gas, or coal. That way there would be competition between those commodities or if there is heavy use for coal, for example, the plant could switch to gas or oil. It would be one way to relieve the deficient of oil in KB at least.
M
marshal.ney

All worlds
28 Aug 2016 08:39Link
Will there be an impact on the welfare index for non-polluting energy sources?
J
jacksonz24

All worlds
20 Sep 2016 23:07Link
your guys forget geothermal and Tidal power also very good alternate fuels to
M
marshal.ney

All worlds
21 Sep 2016 02:43Link
i.e Carbon footprints. Want to see a big reduction in the real world? Raze the Amazon Rain Forest, and turn it into a parking lot, with 12 inch deep asphalt. That will lock down a lot of carbon. :P

Nuclear vs electric energy. Zen pointed out some pertinent facts. I'd like to point out one more. They are both used for the same purpose. But Electric Power is listed first. It's easier to scroll down to it, and buy the first one that pops up for manual sales.

There is also no Nuclear Power on the Direct Trade Page. Which is odd.