Simcountry
Forum General Proposal to GMs re Security Council

Proposal to GMs re Security Council

M
Michael

All worlds
26 May 2019 01:34Link
I have a bold idea regarding the Security Council. Instead of having the Security Council set up as it is why not have all countries (that want to participate) be members of a United Nations Assembly on each world. This will hopefully increase dialogue and communication among the players. The Security Council would oversee this world body and be made up the present number of members. Membership to the Security Council would be for those players who have a long history in simcountry (in other words the veterans). The Security Council would have more powers and could veto the Assembly. It could also be cable of raising a small world army or police force. It would have better functions to aid countries as well as it sees fit.
I am posting this on the Suggestion forum as well (yes Letsie a double post) for greater exposure.
L
Letsie

All worlds
27 May 2019 01:23Link
Double posting is so 2019.

It has a nice ring to it but implementing something like this is a lot more complicated then it sounds. I honestly wonder if it is worth it.
D
Daniel Iceling

All worlds
27 May 2019 07:19Link
Michael,

Double posting doesn't increase exposure. With limited forum activity these days. Most people only read "General" anyway. The sub categories existed for when there were so many posts each day, that it would be impossible to read them all.

Signed President of DanNation on LU
M
Michael

All worlds
28 May 2019 12:52Link
Wow with such negativity no wonder why no one is on the Forum anymore.
S
SuperSoldierRCP

All worlds
05 Jun 2019 23:59Link
Your ideas are things that have been suggested in the past and wasn't liked and in some cases strongly disapproved of for a number of reasons.

The way Simcountry is built many players preferred the "Top down" system compared to your "Bottom up". In your scenario Security members would have Veto power. This means you could have EVERY new player spam the leadership with non stop requests for cash aid, or requesting wars/investigations on players who are below level three, or various other nonsense requests. By the sheer rate of spam, mistakes are bound to happen. Plus you would need several people to veto 1 topic, they would need more time which is cumbersome, and overall it would be a giant mess. This is why players favored the current system because in most cases the security council members are semi or very experienced players. It was preferred because you still need someone to reach out to a member to request aid, the group s