J
John Galt
All worlds
01 Dec 2019 16:59Link
I believe given the current population of the game, 5 worlds is too many. We were in the discord chat today talking about the state of the game, and it came up in the discussion that at one point in the game's history, it was possible to transfer an empire to Golden Rainbow when it was a premium only world. This means that there is a mechanism in place for players to move their empires and CEOs to another world.
I believe there should only be two worlds in this game. Fearless Blue and White Giant. White Giant being chosen for its large size, and Fearless Blue being chosen for its status as the war world. I think that war level restrictions should be completely removed on FB. War level there would be purely for achievement. Any player should be able to attack any player on that world regardless of war level. White Giant would retain the existing war level structure and restrictions.
I believe there are many benefits to this: First of al
I believe there should only be two worlds in this game. Fearless Blue and White Giant. White Giant being chosen for its large size, and Fearless Blue being chosen for its status as the war world. I think that war level restrictions should be completely removed on FB. War level there would be purely for achievement. Any player should be able to attack any player on that world regardless of war level. White Giant would retain the existing war level structure and restrictions.
I believe there are many benefits to this: First of al
D
dubletar
All worlds
01 Dec 2019 17:03Link
I completely agree with this.
J
jeffcd1818
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 01:41Link
I agree as well you would have the best of both worlds and players would have a clear choice or can have the ability play both a peaceful and aggressive style at the same time.
Its also kind of depressing seeing all those empty countries. It might even bring back the Fed on Fed wars that were challenging and so much fun.
Its also kind of depressing seeing all those empty countries. It might even bring back the Fed on Fed wars that were challenging and so much fun.
J
Johanas Bilderberg
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 01:43Link
I completely agree. It would make the servers much faster to update.
J
jeffcd1818
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 01:54Link
I agree as well it would be the best of both worlds. It will give players a clear choice of either playing a peaceful or an aggressive game or both at the same time.
Its also depressing seeing all those empty countries. And it might even bring back those fed on fer wars that were so challenging and so much fun.
Its also depressing seeing all those empty countries. And it might even bring back those fed on fer wars that were so challenging and so much fun.
J
jeffcd1818
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 01:55Link
Sry for the repeat i must be forum challenged lol
R
Ragnar Lothbrok
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 03:57Link
This is a great suggestion.
L
Lord Mndz
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 06:12Link
+1
L
Letsie
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 09:35Link
+1 +1+1+1 +1+1+1 +1+1
L
Letsie
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 15:06Link
I was a bit short on time during my last post but I do want to ad something.
Personally I would lose out on a LOT of bennefits from having empires on 2 worlds. On average I earn anywhere between 1T en 25T per day by trading between those worlds. If the markets became combined I would lose all that cash. Despite that I really think that this would benefit the game.
Say what you want but there are not enough people for 5 worlds right now.
Personally I would lose out on a LOT of bennefits from having empires on 2 worlds. On average I earn anywhere between 1T en 25T per day by trading between those worlds. If the markets became combined I would lose all that cash. Despite that I really think that this would benefit the game.
Say what you want but there are not enough people for 5 worlds right now.
Z
Zentrino
All worlds
02 Dec 2019 22:04Link
Agreed
M
Michael
All worlds
03 Dec 2019 18:36Link
Disagree. Leave things as they are. This has been suggested before and was put down. If more new players join there will not be enough countries for them. I also play on all 5 worlds (as do quite a few other players) so will I (and them) be fully compensated for the loss of my countries on the 3 other worlds?
I say leave well enough alone.
I say leave well enough alone.
J
Jonni
All worlds
04 Dec 2019 13:16Link
While it is an interesting idea... We won't be reducing the number of worlds or offering a way to move countries/empires/CEOs between worlds.
L
Letsie
All worlds
04 Dec 2019 15:39Link
To bad... You can not blame us for trying ;)
J
John Galt
All worlds
04 Dec 2019 18:41Link
Jonni something has to be done to get player numbers up. The game needs more interaction. I really think you guys need to reevaluate the damage that the war level system is doing to your wonderful game.
M
Michael
All worlds
05 Dec 2019 18:22Link
I think the change to Natural Resources will get players (hopefully) interacting.