Fearless Blue War

What is the point of having to be a player on Fearless Blue for 14 real days before I’m able to attack another player owned country? Seems a bit excessive, I can understand 4 or 6 days maybe even a week at max but to have to wait 2 weeks before I can fight a pvp war on a war world is a bit much. Maybe that’s something that can be changed in an update or maybe I’m just missing something. What’s everyone else’s thoughts?

Also a side note what war level do you have to be on Fearless Blue in order to fight a pvp war? The game documentation says war level 3 or higher but by those requirements only like 6 or 7 people on the whole world meet that requirement. Has this requirement been lowered since the documentation was published?

yea, the system is crappy right now.

I mean unless you can get together with another player to workout a planned pvp war idk how u can find someone else to fight. honestly if you see this message tony, I would be down to create a country on FB and maybe fight a planned war. anyone else invited lol. I want to have some action. maybe have a Cold War situation and just arms race until we fight and test things out. I'm very down for that.

it is interesting how it should work. Let's say I give some country as a stage for pvp - let's call it PVP-Arena, then 10 or more players dedicate one of their countries for pvp and declare on each other, also they all declare on my PVP-arena country. then they all send set bases in PVP arena to have troops dropped and start fighting with each other units in my PVP- arena country. THe idea would be not to take the country but to fight unit vs unit.

The PVP-Arena would not have air defences or no maybe defences at all, as the purpose is not to occupy it, but fight units from different players.

It should be fun we just need to decide how to decide who wins, and what weapons should be used. Maybe only ground weapons to make it fun.

Please chip in to this idea, as I feel it would be fun and we-players can do that without W3C.

honestly that doesn't sound like a bad idea either. if you would want to set one up with as many people are down that would be cool. like you said, we can do this without W3C.

a Cold War scenario like the one described earlier, or a team battle that is set up as a world war would be interesting ideas as well.

yea, let's wait other players to chip in.

Im definitely down with a cold war situation, sounds like it would be lots of fun. If I went to war with anyone I would want to make it as big as possible (player wise) in order to have as much fun as possible with it fully knowing I may very will lose my countries I worked so hard for.

hey tony, I'm down to have a Cold War scenario setup. message me. ill make a country on FB and we can be neighbors so we can use ground forces as well.

Hi all