Simcountry
Forum Fearless Blue 100 GC Bounty: Andy Clark and the Return of the Sovereign Nation of SeekHaven (FB)

100 GC Bounty: Andy Clark and the Return of the Sovereign Nation of SeekHaven (FB)

A
Alexandria Hollander

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 18:27Link
I offer 100 GCs to any known, long standing player, that can manage to drive Andy Clark and the rest of Multi Accounts off of every server in SC. Or simply return the Soveriegn Nation of SeekHaven (FB) to the rightful rule of it's owner (Alexandria Hollander)

I realize the bounty could be more, but considering it's over 3/4th of my GCs at the moment, it's what I can offer.

Fine Print: Offer not Valid to any Andy & Co Subsidary, Ally, Co-Conspirator, or Supporter.
B
BorderC (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 18:43Link
If SeekHaven means that much to you, you would probably have more success offering to buy it back from Andy for some amount of GC. You may be able to get it for half of what you're willing to give as bounty.

Just a suggestion.

BC
A
Alexandria Hollander

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:04Link
I attempted Civility and Diplomacy with Andy Clark. His answer was the Illegal Annexation of SeekHaven. I plead for Peace as a Member of the Security Council in the form of an Enforced Peace Proposal. I still returned the next day to my country stolen without even the decency of a news report to inform me of the aftermath. If I was an Empire with countries to spare, I wouldn't be as upset, however, after ruling SeekHaven for 185 years with diplomacy and compassion, to have it stolen for No reason whatsoever is simply unacceptable, bad form, and poor sportsmanship.
Behavior and Conduct of this nature on the International Stage leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. Andy C strikes me as the 1 in 25 people who have no conscience whatsoever and would likely sell his grandmother for a couple extra rounds of warmonger ammo.

And before any excuses are offered in the form of "It's the war world, wank wank wank." Wars have rules, sover
W
WildEyes (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:16Link
Or... how about...

"It's a game and you signed up to play on the war world."


That point always works for me. Don't worry. Andy & Co won't need to pick on people like you in a little while as I'll be more than happy to oblige them soon enough.
B
BorderC (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:33Link
Seriously though. If that's how you want to play then you should have signed up in one of the other worlds. What he did was fair on FB. On other worlds you may have received more sympathy.

Listen, if you want to play diplomacy then offer to purchase it back from him and sign a treaty with his fed. You can probably get it for 50GC.

Or start a new empire on another world.

Best,
BC
A
Alexandria Hollander

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:34Link
I've heard of missing the point. However I've never seen someone actively dodge and evade a point quite like that. Wow.
W
WildEyes (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:39Link
There is no need to address your point because it rests on faulty suppositions. We are addressing those suppositions and attempting to correct them.
B
BorderC (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:40Link
Start watching MSNBC....

Anyways, your point is that Andy beat you in FB and took your country. You believe he is a multi and it was done unfairly. Now you want to offer people GC to take him out.

You have my suggestion. Good luck with the offer.

BC
A
Alexandria Hollander

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:41Link
@BC: What you are proposing is Rewarding a Pirate for Invading a Sovereign Nation. This is mostly a check test. If I'm gonna bother investing anymore GCs into FB, I need to know there are some worth-while players out there who can still maintain the environment and community. Someone in another post made the comparison of Civilizations vs Barbarians. Well, honestly if the Barbarians have overtaken FB and there isn't a Civilizations Backlash to teach the ruffian upstarts the rules and conduct of International Relations, why would I waste another Coin on a world of Waste. Seekhaven exists on other worlds. Quite nicely in Secured Mode to prevent such heinousness.

Our "Real World" is a "War World" and Switzerland was invaded last WHEN EXACTLY? Nuff said.
W
WildEyes (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:44Link
Switzerland would be a logistical nightmare to invade, and a wonderland for defenders. Not to mention the terrain also caters to prolonged resistance even after the war is over. Oh, and then there is all the money the swiss control in their banks.

Again, faulty suppositions.

The swiss aren't invaded because they can bite back, not because of your Rousseau-ian fantasy.
D
Danneh Turner (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:48Link
There is a newspaper mention of this the August 2611 newspaper, which is over 2 real days old. [what have you been doing in the meantime?]

Unfortunately Alexandria, it is you who is missing the point on this one. I second Border's suggestion that you ask andy to sell you back the country; if you get it, either defend it with weapons as well as diplomacy, or buy some war protection.
B
BorderC (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:50Link
My quote:
"If SeekHaven means that much to you......"

If it doesn't, then don't. You're sounding more like a whiner. Grow up. Admit you lost. Learn from your loss. Get experienced with war, go back and take him out yourself. Or take your ball and go home.


"Our "Real World" is a "War World" and Switzerland was invaded last WHEN EXACTLY? Nuff said."

You will find that there are a lot of differences between SimCountry and the Real World.


BC
B
BorderC (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:51Link
"if you get it, either defend it with weapons as well as diplomacy, or buy some war protection. "

And to add to Danneh, join a federation.
A
Alexandria Hollander

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:54Link
@WildEyes:

Yet, you haven't stated the Faults, nor the "suppositions" you state you are addressing/correcting. I have no qualms with CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, and fully accept there is a lot I can learn about International Diplomacy.

I miss Klarina. She was so much better with International Diplomacy than I am.
S
ShcyzMattiCa (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 19:57Link
I declare war immediately upon any who answer this call!!!

Leave FB Alex its a war world, but most worlds are headed in the way of war as well.

100 gc isn't hardly worth attempting to take out a good player, especially on all servers/worlds. . . . thats like offering someone ten bucks for their homes. A joke.
W
WildEyes (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 20:13Link
You're under the impression that there is either some kind of metaphysical undergirding to a similarly illusory standard of conduct which has been violated here, OR, you are under a Rousseau-ian delusion that civilization arises from the 'noble savages.'

I am attempting to remind you of this by statings that you are firstly playing a game, and secondly that you are playing on a war world, where, if there was a supposed code of conduct, this would be entirely acceptable anyways.

Further, Klarina had significant economic and military prowess to back up her 'diplomacy,' as well as numerous allies with similar stature.

You obviously lacked the two latter, and if your SeekHaven on LU is any indication, the former is lacking as well.

To summarize: GG, re-roll?
A
Alexandria Hollander (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 20:22Link
Wow. Just...Wow. Looks like I should have followed the example of those before. SC is Dead. It was a good run. At least a couple of years of entertainment. My countries will be freed from my ineffectual tyranny at the end of my current GCs.

Thank you for your thoughts.

I'll leave you with a couple of my favorite quotes:
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

"...to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak;" - Hammurabi
W
WildEyes (Kebir Blue)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 20:32Link
I somehow think Edmund Burke and Hammurabi would feel that their quotes are being misapplied in this context.

Do you express these sentiments when you play RISK as well? Or do you and your friends just sit around with your territory cards looking at how nice it looks when you fill them up with pieces and never attack each other?

Or similarly, in chess, do you only play to watch the horsies do cute jumps over other pieces?
A
Alexandria Hollander (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 20:43Link
Never ceases to amaze me that people justify thier behavior and actions as acceptable because it's a "game". As if they would somehow reign in thier impulse and suddenly behave in a purely acceptable measure if it were "Real".
Personally, I think a persons Gamesmanship speaks volumes to thier character. But you did score one more quote:

"I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law."
- Aristotle

If your missing the relevancy, it's here:
I don't need a game rule to tell me Unprovoked and Unchecked Aggression is wrong and exposes a dangerous personality trait. But I'm just a *ahem* "Whiner".

Hope you fair as well when and if it's your turn.
W
WildEyes (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
05 Jan 2009 20:48Link
It's been my turn many times, and I've won them.

Ask andy about when his fed put over 114 war decs on me and my empire in under a day.

And you know what? It was really fun.

I gesture back at my examples of RISK and Chess.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
06 Jan 2009 00:23Link
Recently i was elected to a 2 month term on the SC, in FB. I was stuned, it was my first ever nomination. I'm not the type of player that goes for rank, and inflated score. To be fair, i'm not saying those that are on top do that, i simply try to build what i think is the best empire i can. And as i'm multi-world, my FB asests suffered.

So here i am, trying to figure out how to be a member of the SC, I find the check box that sends me a notification when ever a new proposal is created. Then I sit back and wait.

So we come to the proposal by Alexandria. I was a bit excited, then disappointed. One of the security council trying to bail them self out?? OK, so I looked at the country under attack.

Alex, you had no weapons? After, you said, 185 SC years? Did at some point you think that some one was going to come for you? Or was your plan to give them a lecture?

I read the reasoning behind the prop
D
Dave33

All worlds
06 Jan 2009 01:41Link
Alexandria put a bounty on Andy's head. She might as well put a bounty on my head too. I'll be the next player to conquer her new Seekhaven unless she changes her ways.

I believe Seekhaven had something like 50 million in population and trillions of SC$ wealth in it. It was very poorly defended. I've seen C3's that had better defensives. It probably took Andy like 15 minutes to overthrown it and he probably lost some missile batteries. The country data of Seekhaven was available for everyone to view. It was advertising a free meal to a pack of wolves. I'm surprised no one had conquered it sooner on FB. It was a nice country. An example of how a country can develop when there's no expenses on a military.

When I was a new player, I had a nice country (with what I thought was a big military) too. I was a loner and didn't belong to a federation. I was going to build a mighty country. My main and
J
Jo Jo Hun (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
06 Jan 2009 01:43Link
Adam was the one who provided the civilization vs barbarians worldview. He was then asked why he wanted to build a civilized empire in the middle of a battle zone, and his response would appropriately have been 'because of the challenge of it.' It's a challenge to build something valuable and lasting when you know others are going to try to take it from you. The wealthier your country, the more difficult it is to keep it from being raided. Adam rose to the challenge and rebuilt his empire with a strong defense, both militarily and diplomatically.

Seekhaven had virtually no defense, and was way up on the list of potential raiding targets for a long time. Sim goes out of its way to tell you that you need strong defenses. A country has to pay for that...you were getting a free ride for 185 years. That may be playing by the letter of the rules, but not by the spirit of the rules. Fearless Blue is advertised as the war world, and al
C
CLAM (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
06 Jan 2009 02:38Link
Alexandria i have lost good counites to players on FB and others have lost some to me like Jo Jo here lost his main to me and then he took it back while i was inactive for a while but its no problem....then i was still doing good with 2 good counties and i lost them 2 but i didnt whine for them back i just simply started on LU and am doing pretty good....and am trying to get back on top on FB.
V
VĂ¡li (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
06 Jan 2009 02:44Link
This is a game, and fb is the war world. We come here to fight. Yes I invest alot of time in building up my empire, and yes I will be unhappy if someone takes it from me, but will I cry? No! I will build a new empire and strike back.
Start a new country and the 3ms will help you become much stronger than you were before. We do not seek to get rid of players but do enjoy the game. Many of our members have been former enemies, we are now good friends as they enjoy the game more with us.
Wildeyes and barney are coming for us. I dont care if they win. I look forward to the fun of the fight. This is the war world, where fighting is a big part of the game. I like wildeyes and barney as they play the game in good spirits. They dont cry when I attack and dont gloat when they kick my arse.
This is not real life. There are no real politics. Wildeyes and barney are my enemies because the game would be boring without them.
They serve as good enemies,