| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 01:05 am |
To: great britian
Real Date: 18-01-2016 00:55:44
World Date: October 25 3734
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: war level
Message: back to the game bro i dont have time to discuss real life politics with you. first off tho u retard america HAS THE MOsT nukes in the world. not the other way around. and if ur so tough go ahead in real life go fight the russians or the chinese or anyone and u have ur family killed by nukes. do you honestly wanna trade london or new york for moscow. have millions die. your ignorant. world war two ur talking about the battle of great brittian. do u know how many americans came to aid you guys, not officially because we were neutral. lend lease we gave you guys weapons. winston churchill YOUR OWN PRIME minsister said that the war was won as soon as the japense hit us because we got drug into a war. i dont wanna hear about anything in real life if america gets hit u guys should help us if u get hit we better help you. but ur here on a game running ur mouth about nukes. while hiding bro hiding ur not being anything but a bitch and theres a problem with that
Can evrybody please tell him russia has the most nukes research it they do
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 01:09 am |
Explanations why a-bombs and h-bombs do not actually exist:
but actually I think you are accurate in that Russia supposedly has more ICBMs than USA . . .which by the way also don't go to space (part of how ICBMs supposedly work) because . . . .there is no space travel either . . . ..
by the way the world is flat, it's your eyes that are spherically shaped, the universe is a hologram,. buy gold bye ! !
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 01:14 am |
Yep russia have more submarine nukes etc and they have the biggest and most powerfull nukes americans will do enything to bring russia down so will us brits but russia army is modern not old and rusty they have afew more thousand nukes not just icbms also bomber nukes submarine nukes etc etc
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 01:19 am |
http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/world-top-ten-countries-by-nuclear-warheads-map.html Yep russia have 8,500 america has 7,300 and france with 300 and britian with 125 cant remember the rest
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 03:40 am |
You only need enough to end the world one time over. America and Russia each have enough to end all multicellular life on this planet even if they just pile them all in one place and set them off.
Neither country really needs any delivery systems to end the world.
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 03:42 am |
Such weapons. Don't. Actually. Exist.
Sorry if I bursted your bubbel ??
by the way, the world it's *^%#%#ing FLAT, I am so tired of everybody falling for these grand deceptions like spacetravel, nuclear weapons, the cartography, etc., generation after generation . . . . entire populations worldwide seem to believe everything they've seen on television but they don't know that television tells lies to your vision ! !
It's almost as if some people who control the states want us to believe the state has powers like GOD or some thing . . . to traverse the astral realm and vaporize cities ha ha ha yeah sure what ever. .
Before Astronauts and ICBMs it was the Catholic Church and before that it was Zeus and Poseidon and all that give me a break . . . .
Area effect weapons like artillery, carpet bombing, and specifically chemical weapons??? Yeah now THATS some things I could be afraid of . . . but if you subscribe to nuclear weapons actually existing I suppose you also subscribe to Astronauts on the Moon right?? Isn't that the place where you look upon the Earth and see it is a small small little blue marbel??? WHATEVER
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 08:05 am |
Actually,America has more sub nukes than Russia.However,the Russian stockpile of tactical nukes and ICBMs is greater than America`s.They might also have an edge over the Americans in space weaponry.Their FOBS-Fractional Orbital Bombardment System-supposedly carries more warheads than the MIRV-Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicle......And West,if there are no atomic bombs,can u explain Nagasaki or Hiroshima?
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 04:41 pm |
Explanations why a-bombs and h-bombs do not actually exist:
| Monday, January 18, 2016 - 08:24 pm |
Robertos thry have more submarines but not mor nukes russia have 8,500 america has 7,300 russia has more nukes they have more sub nukes icbms etc etc america has more submarines to carry then
| Tuesday, January 19, 2016 - 06:03 pm |
John Smith get a life and a girlfriend/boyfriend.
| Tuesday, January 19, 2016 - 11:08 pm |
King ur a dumbass ffs lmfao i have a life im alive aint i ? And i have a gf called emma
| Wednesday, January 20, 2016 - 03:39 am |
Does emma know she is your girlfriend?
| Wednesday, January 20, 2016 - 05:13 pm |
Since when were you dating auntie emm? Besides, she's married.
| Thursday, January 21, 2016 - 05:05 am |
I have a Political Science degree. I think I might be able to shed some light on the topic.
It is believed that Russia has the most nuclear warheads. However, In the START 1 and SORT treaties it was agreed the nations would mirror each other in amount of warheads held. In the late 80's the nations where expected to have a total of 65,000 warheads combined. That number has since been reduced to about 12,000, each reportedly holding 6,000. Again this is number and we don't know if its entirely true.
However, for the sake of argument. Let say Russia does have the largest stockpile. US Foreign policy states that any nuclear weapon when uses defensively must be able to destroy any size city/installation. Often times the largest 5 US city are used as scales. If a weapon can effectively destroy the targets then it is introduced as a nuclear deterrent. Because of this most US missiles are made to be submarine or bomber based to ensure rapid deployment and limited chances of being intercepted. This allows the payloads to be much greater in size and destructive power.
Russian forces are almost entirely land based due to its size and need to secure its borders in both Europe and Asia. Due to this fact Russian weapons tend to be in much smaller yields. However, Russians tend to compensate by creative ICBM's that deliver mult-missiles per rocket.
In short... Russia has the advantage in terms of superior numbers, but Americans have the advantage in destructive power and rapid deployment.
| Thursday, January 21, 2016 - 06:05 am |
Supersoilder no disrepeect but science degree has nothing to do with war weapons russia have larger easier deplyoment and more destructive nukes and bigger aswell russia has the biggest there is 20,000 nukes in the world expected to rise over the next decade to around 25,000 russia has 8,500 expected to imcrease to 10,000 america nukes expexted to decrease to 6,900 as they currently have 7,300 over the next couple of decades a russian bomber managed to fly over califona airspace on the land on american soil before it was chased off it could have laumched its nuke then boom califona
| Thursday, January 21, 2016 - 02:28 pm |
John smith every time you post its disrespectful to human intelligence as a whole lol,making us look bad as a species.
| Friday, January 22, 2016 - 02:50 am |
John Smith, I have a "POLITICAL SCIENCE" degree with a concentration in Foreign Policy...
Political science is a social science discipline that deals with systems of government and the analysis of political activity and political behavior.
I don't know where your numbers come from but those are obliviously wrong.
It goes against the START and SALT treaties, and as for a bomber landing in California. I find that hard to believe. Your telling me the Navy, Air force, Army, and Coast Guard all failed to realize a Russian Bomber?
I would suggest you get off conspiracy sites and really learn Political Science.
| Friday, January 22, 2016 - 12:29 pm |
I'm not sure if this is a really good troll or dangerously stupid.
| Friday, January 22, 2016 - 04:10 pm |
Supersoilder go look at the link ffs its 8,500 russia has america has 7,300
| Friday, January 22, 2016 - 10:43 pm |
| Friday, January 22, 2016 - 10:54 pm |
No one can be that stupid... I think hes trolling and hes creating quite a promising career.