Simcountry
Forum White Giant Loser leaves WG: do EC, Orbiter, BA, and Brutus accept? (White Giant)

Loser leaves WG: do EC, Orbiter, BA, and Brutus accept? (White Giant)

C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Sep 2010 17:44Link
Here is my offer for you. If you have the guts to accept:

1. Take all your countries (except secure mains) out of war protection.

2. I will take out my 3 countries out of war protection after you do.

3. War will start.

4. If you take my 3 countries first, I will leave WG (strip my main and enterprsie and sell them)

5. If I take any 3 countries of any of you first, you 4 leave WG (strip your other countries and enterprises and leave)

6. Only rules are: 1. if anyone enters war protection for any countries, they lose.

7. There are no other rules. A fight to see who is better in war. If you 4 can take me out first, you win. If I take out 3 of your countries first -- any 3 -- I win. You 4 or I leave WG.

Are you man/woman enough to take the challenge, or you wimps?
B
BrokenAmbitions (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Sep 2010 18:11Link
Funny stuff chryso. One word for you in response, Trap. but, *claps*

Lord knows how much time you've put into lying, scheming, setting up rumors, etc.. to get people to help you. But we weren't born yesterday..

But I commend that SNAPP threw offense back though. You can throw things all you want at my countries with your c3's. You need the practice, heck I'd war train with you after this crap is settled, but, Yeah I don't do "treatys" or "deals" or any of that, I just say this:

"SNAPP will not recieve another bullet from any of my countries, unless this war escalates, or more declares come through. :)"

Chryso, compliments also, for having the last offical Debt bomb on SC. :)

As for "losses" and such, Nothing
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Sep 2010 18:15Link
I consider this an offer of peace from BA. Do EC, Brutus, or Oribter agree to peace as BA did? Will they agree to war? Or do they want to continue with how things are?
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Sep 2010 18:43Link
shoot, if you consider that a peace offer?

"SNAPP will not recieve another bullet from any of my countries, unless this war escalates, or more declares come through. " -BA

i'm stunned, but thats actually what we want, stop the aggression, on both sides? i can live with it just ending.

i do, as a request, ask that you remove any and all corps from my countries, but thats a request, not a demand.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Sep 2010 20:08Link
Orbiter,

So if you simply type the same exact words BA did, and the other 2 do the same, we'll have peace.

Orbiter, you are welcome to nationalize (or otherwise bid on) any corporations in your countries that I own, I will not debt bomb them.

Unfortunatly, I will not be able to move all of them promptly, as that takes time. If and after a peace agreement is reached, I can begin working to move corporations. However, that will likely take several real life weeks and possibly months. It took over a year to build them all, it will take time to move them. (unless you nationalize, which is fine with me)
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
23 Sep 2010 00:08Link
In an e-mail Orbiter confirmed that his last post was agreeing to the same as BA. Thus, 2 of the 4 have agreed to peace.

EC and Brutus - if you post your agreement, we are at peace based on the terms stated by BA above.

The exact terms, as said by BA are: "SNAPP will not recieve another bullet from any of my countries, unless this war escalates, or more declares come through. :)"
B
Brutus Buckeye (White Giant)

All worlds
23 Sep 2010 01:41Link
ok....I agree with what ba said


Brutus
E
EC (White Giant)

All worlds
23 Sep 2010 01:42Link
Agreed...same terms as mentioned by BA
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
23 Sep 2010 02:20Link
Peace has been reached.
E
EC (White Giant)

All worlds
11 Oct 2010 08:10Link
So...Ahmose...I assume the new war decs mean that the treaty is null and void?? GSE needs to know, so appropriate actions can be taken. You are chairman of a SNAPP branch, so we assume that by declaring war, you are speaking for all of them? Clarify your actions, as they are direct violations of the treaty.
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
11 Oct 2010 09:28Link
Uh oh dun dun dun.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
11 Oct 2010 16:33Link
EC - Just a misscommunication. Orbiter and I had agreed for me to attack Justice, and I didn't let Ahmose know...when he later saw Orbiter and I in war (though we are not at war and he agreed to the attack), he thought war had broken out and declared.

At the same time, it appears Orbiter was also raiding another player (JHW) and you appear to be fighting in several wars....so, needless to say, it was easy to think war had broken out.

All members of SNAPP have been at a hightened state of alert after your earlier unprovoked attack, and, it leads to the type of sitaution where such misscommunications can take place.

I have notified folks on the SNAPP side that my "war" with orbiter is not a war, and that unless you or others attack or issue new war decs that we should not engage in hostilities.
P
Psycho_Honey

All worlds
11 Oct 2010 20:01Link
Now that Chrysostom is one responsible Fella.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
11 Oct 2010 21:10Link
Thanks Wendy; my appologies to those folks who got out their lawn chairs and popcorn, but there is no ongoing war at this time between SNAPP and GSE.

Once again, my attack on Justice (done with prior agreement with Orbiter) was not me being attacked by Orbiter or me attacking Orbiter. Any players inside of or outside of SNAPP who got confused and attacked based on it are asked to hold off further hostilities unless GSE issues new war decs or attacks.

I am trying to work with folks inside SNAPP and outside SNAPP who may have thought I was attacked or am attacking Orbiter, to ensure they are aware that (unless it is the case that GSE wants a war) that no war was intended by SNAPP or by me, and that I was not attacked by orbiter.