S
SweetPea
11 Nov 2012 22:10
Link
Peace Treaty enforced between Sajida_Hussein and Silence.
The countries can't start war between them if the resolution is accepted.
Everything about this resolution stinks. First of all, I have attacked not a single new player. I have attacked Sinaloa, Steven Ryan, and Rob Kennedy for obvious reasons. Many longer term players know exactly why I have done this.
There was a player who oddly enough has encamped his/herself on all borders of Steven Ryan's and Rob Kennedy's power base, a cluster of well stocked war slaves. I declared on these countries because I found it an oddity. But we(that player and myself) soon came to an agreement with no shots fired and a strong sense of a commitment to a peaceful future.
To top all this off, Sajida_Hussein is the computer controlled C3 country I took with my main. Why should the security council be abused as a method of putting forth false propaganda?
Needless to say, I already took the C3, and the vote is meaningless. Why would the security council stop me from taking a computer country anyway.
Nevertheless the war will continue until I find the war engine stable enough to move ahead to stage two. Right now there are a few unresolved issues or oversights that greatly affect the ability to carry out wars in a conventional manner and a more decisive war could follow up any fixes by the gms to the issues I brought up with them.
The countries can't start war between them if the resolution is accepted.
<!-Quote-!>Quote:The Resolution was a proposal by Stephen Ryan with the following motivation:
wendy is again attacking with her c3 wasting everyones time and now attacking new players
The Security Council accepted the proposal.
4 council members voted for the proposal and 1 council member voted against it.
General Voting is possible until 1 Oct 3071
33 presidents voted for the resolution and 2 presidents voted against it.<!-/Quote-!>
Everything about this resolution stinks. First of all, I have attacked not a single new player. I have attacked Sinaloa, Steven Ryan, and Rob Kennedy for obvious reasons. Many longer term players know exactly why I have done this.
There was a player who oddly enough has encamped his/herself on all borders of Steven Ryan's and Rob Kennedy's power base, a cluster of well stocked war slaves. I declared on these countries because I found it an oddity. But we(that player and myself) soon came to an agreement with no shots fired and a strong sense of a commitment to a peaceful future.
To top all this off, Sajida_Hussein is the computer controlled C3 country I took with my main. Why should the security council be abused as a method of putting forth false propaganda?
Needless to say, I already took the C3, and the vote is meaningless. Why would the security council stop me from taking a computer country anyway.
Nevertheless the war will continue until I find the war engine stable enough to move ahead to stage two. Right now there are a few unresolved issues or oversights that greatly affect the ability to carry out wars in a conventional manner and a more decisive war could follow up any fixes by the gms to the issues I brought up with them.
