Simcountry is a multiplayer Internet game in which you are the president, commander in chief, and industrial leader. You have to make the tough decisions about cutting or raising taxes, how to allocate the federal budget, what kind of infrastructure you want, etc..
  Enter the Game

Security Council Resolution Proposed by Steven Ryan

Topics: Golden Rainbow: Security Council Resolution Proposed by Steven Ryan


Sunday, November 11, 2012 - 10:10 pm Click here to edit this post
Peace Treaty enforced between Sajida_Hussein and Silence.
The countries can't start war between them if the resolution is accepted.


The Resolution was a proposal by Stephen Ryan with the following motivation:
wendy is again attacking with her c3 wasting everyones time and now attacking new players
The Security Council accepted the proposal.
4 council members voted for the proposal and 1 council member voted against it.

General Voting is possible until 1 Oct 3071
33 presidents voted for the resolution and 2 presidents voted against it.

Everything about this resolution stinks. First of all, I have attacked not a single new player. I have attacked Sinaloa, Steven Ryan, and Rob Kennedy for obvious reasons. Many longer term players know exactly why I have done this.

There was a player who oddly enough has encamped his/herself on all borders of Steven Ryan's and Rob Kennedy's power base, a cluster of well stocked war slaves. I declared on these countries because I found it an oddity. But we(that player and myself) soon came to an agreement with no shots fired and a strong sense of a commitment to a peaceful future.

To top all this off, Sajida_Hussein is the computer controlled C3 country I took with my main. Why should the security council be abused as a method of putting forth false propaganda?

Needless to say, I already took the C3, and the vote is meaningless. Why would the security council stop me from taking a computer country anyway.

Nevertheless the war will continue until I find the war engine stable enough to move ahead to stage two. Right now there are a few unresolved issues or oversights that greatly affect the ability to carry out wars in a conventional manner and a more decisive war could follow up any fixes by the gms to the issues I brought up with them.


Monday, November 12, 2012 - 03:56 am Click here to edit this post


No nuclear attacks by Sajida_Hussein.
The resolution is accepted. The country is not able to use nuclear arms in an attack.
The Resolution was a proposal by Rob kennedy with the following motivation:
Sweatpea attacking a defenceless empire.

And again, yet another completely false fabrication.

Steven Ryan, Sinaloa, and Rob Kennedy's empires are hardly defenseless.

All have mains stockpiled with at least a thousand real dollars of military assets in them.

Who is this defenseless player?

Did you mean it is hard to defend 3 separate 'entities' when they come under multiple attacks? Because that motivation makes more sense, and I might have even voted in your favor :)


Monday, November 12, 2012 - 03:15 pm Click here to edit this post
LMAO. Welcome back Wendy SweetPea.


Friday, November 16, 2012 - 12:02 am Click here to edit this post
Propaganda wars. Second best to a big, nuclear cloud.


Friday, November 16, 2012 - 12:14 am Click here to edit this post
No nuclear clouds when presidents run.

Add a Message