Simcountry
Forum Golden Rainbow Security Council Resolution against I like shoes

Security Council Resolution against I like shoes

J
Jauterson001

All worlds
21 Oct 2017 02:35Link
From: Alliance Global
To: Welcome Back
Real Date: 17-10-2017 23:00:51
World Date: January 12 4054
Subject: diappointment
Message: the alliance global is highly diappointed with you that you couldnt stand with us in the time of need, we wish to state that all diplomatic relation with your nation has been totally eradicated henceforth... thanks my problem has been resolved peacefully


I received this message from the originator of the security council resolution. He is upset that I stayed neutral when his ally the DPRK started making threats to an alliance that I had no affiliation with. Apparently now he wishes to punish me. We will not stand for sanctions of any type. We will retaliate with our own actions.
J
Jauterson001

All worlds
21 Oct 2017 12:58Link
I apologize for the extra posts. For some reason my browser was not refreshing to show the new threads being posted when I tried posting them.
J
Jauterson001

All worlds
22 Oct 2017 18:35Link
Subject: Boycott against your country
Message: A boycott against your country "I like shoes" is supported by 11 members of the Security Council. 6 members voted against it.

The country and its corporations cannot trade nuclear weapons.


Expect retaliation from our country soon. All options are now on the table to deal with Prince and his little ally, the DPRK. It is unbelievable that the GR community would back such a resolution without knowing any of the facts behind this situation.

We will not abide by any sanctions that we feel were unjustly placed upon us. We had no option of voicing our objections nor present any evidence backing up our position. This vote was placed behind closed doors, in secrecy, without the full input of the security council to begin with. Then placed to vote by the presidents of GR without their understanding or knowledge of the situation. It is obvious that Prince has used this flawed
P
prince

All worlds
23 Oct 2017 10:10Link
the SOP IS a peaceful nation we do not intend to go into war.. but the SOP has an obligation to keep GR safe.. more sanction will be imposed if you pose a treat to the GR community..
P
prince

All worlds
23 Oct 2017 14:34Link
Re: Re: Security council resolution
From: I like shoes
To: STATE OF PEACE
Real Date: 23-10-2017 12:42:08
World Date: August 08 3951
Subject: Re: Re: Security council resolution
Message: Oh boy don't you know little rocket man, I am a bigger Treat than you know.
E-mail:
P
prince

All worlds
23 Oct 2017 15:22Link
dprk is a real time buddy but thats not the case here you are just forming things up the real point is you want an aid, and you arent saying your real plans of howyou thinkof acquiring huge amount of nuclear warhead for your so called revenge.. in any possible time..
J
Jauterson001

All worlds
23 Oct 2017 16:53Link
If I were wanting this so called revenge nuclear weapons would be the last thing I would think of using. We have seen your current development of nuclear arsenal. We will build up in kind to counter your threats with fire and fury to promote the peace and stability for all the worlds. Not just GR.
P
prince

All worlds
23 Oct 2017 19:55Link
hmm you are the one who is a treat to the GR world..
M
Michael

All worlds
26 Oct 2017 00:00Link
IS your country named State of Peace of State of War I wonder
H
Heisenberg

All worlds
26 Oct 2017 02:50Link
I remember someone trying to threaten me when I was new. Inventard was his name. I wonder where he went to.
J
Jauterson001

All worlds
26 Oct 2017 04:17Link
I never denied that I was a treat to GR
P
prince

All worlds
26 Oct 2017 08:25Link
Jauterson001 you disobeyed an SC order which duely followed a due process.. by the SC member and the general public... its a shame that some members of the GR world still backs up this your uncourtful act... the SOP will never bargain to that until defaulters are punished properly.. SOP
J
Jauterson001

All worlds
27 Oct 2017 20:40Link
There wasn't even a majority of the SC members present for the vote. The process you speak of is highly flawed, and enabled you to take advantage of it to further your own ambitions. We will not abide by any SC order where less than half of the members vote on it. We feel any additional sanctions or orders against our country as an act of war.
S
Sheepman RGB

All worlds
27 Oct 2017 22:51Link
I see the council as a whole as uncourtful, i fully disagree with the right to use nuclear weapons banned, and also act against them for someone that was enacted by your own thoughts, others back up because at this point they agree to like, and disagree to hate. They only got to like, be nice, not to dislike, not to be mean.