| Always Ready | Wednesday, December 14, 2016 - 08:13 pm 
All my shares have a negative IPO, they are nearly all in my own 0% tax countries, but even a 0% tax for years is not the solution, and they are only giving me a big ZERO.
I have nearly 200 corps on the sharemarket, profit transfer 0%
??? |
| Psycho_Honey | Thursday, December 15, 2016 - 01:59 pm
I have arrived, the share market must be made challenging. Fortunes are made and lost on it. |
| Maxime Ceret | Friday, December 16, 2016 - 05:04 am
Anyone care to invest in Artifex Oil? It's profitable |
| Always Ready | Friday, December 16, 2016 - 08:40 am
Forgot to tell I post this as a CEO...
Typical CEO corporation setup:
Worker Salery: 600
Product Quality: 303 (max)
Selling trail quality by +199% / +3% (max)
Buying starts at +8% / +3% (always stable supply)
I buy factory maintenance and electric power at quality 120 via my CEO account and sell it to the corps frequently. The rest of the supplies are bought at higher quality to reach the maximum quality at 303.
---------------------------
Around 200 CEO corps in own countries, and those countries have a setup as follows:
Tax: 0%
Education: 200
Transportation: 150
Health: 120
Social Security: 80%
Stable workforce..!
---------------------------
What can I do more?
In the very start, they were performing very well, but with the time, they became worser and worser on the sharemarket? How many gameyears should I expect to wait for better results, if I make changes in tax and profit transfers?
Maybe Im just stupid, but I expect my corps to go at full maximum in relation to the sharemarket, when they have been under stable conditions several gameyears in row, specially for those product groups with longtime shortages, that my corps can deliver on time without any irregularities.
Should I just lean back and do nothing and just wait..?
Well, now I go with 15% tax in all my countries, couldnt wait any longer, had to do something 
Best regards,
Free Energy Solutions
Little Upsilon |
| SeizeForce | Friday, December 16, 2016 - 12:23 pm
Perhaps what you're missing is a little bit of unstability in the market. Consider nuking someone to see better results. |
| Psycho_Honey | Friday, December 16, 2016 - 03:05 pm
Your salaries are too high. Use better trade strategies. Go back to 0 tax. You're welcome. No further comment. |
| Theinventor1012 | Saturday, December 17, 2016 - 04:57 am
well it seems that you are just as radical as bluestar when you just said nukes are answers to fix the economy. "Consider nuking someone to see better results" Radical Hillary Clinton supporters usually want a nuclear war. |
| Psycho_Honey | Saturday, December 17, 2016 - 06:12 pm
Well, it is common knowledge WW2 pulled the US out of the Great Depression. I think he has a valid point. War demands weapons and ammo. These things are produced with products from the world market. How could you go wrong? |
| Theinventor1012 | Saturday, December 17, 2016 - 08:57 pm
Well wars only help the economy if you win them, otherwise if your cities are bombed your economy could become devastated, WW2 only pulled the US out of the Great Depression because our cities remained intact however if the Nazies and Japanese nuked or bombed all our major cities there would be a massive loss of life and loss in the economy, of course radical Hillary Clinton supporters think if you nuke the world you won't be nuked back. |
| SeizeForce | Sunday, December 18, 2016 - 05:30 am
You just need to make sure you nuke someone who can't nuke back, duh. Theinventor, where did I say you should nuke people who have nukes? |
| Theinventor1012 | Sunday, December 18, 2016 - 06:28 am
Yes you are right we did use 2 nukes against the Japanese and it resulted in a loss of life and probably damaged their infrastructure causing reduced manufacturing in the 2 cities permanently because they couldn't be rebuilt due to radiation, or at least not for a long time. Therefore i'm not sure which countries you have in mine, but the countries like China who are stealing our jobs unfortunately have nuclear weapons so they would nuke us back, therefore your opinion is flawed as in by nuking countries without nukes most liekly will not bring any jobs back. |
| Zen | Sunday, December 18, 2016 - 07:46 am
An EMP is more effective at destroying a large highly developed country from a bunch of nukes. Why? Because that country cant respond with any weapons once they're bombed. I'm scared of a WW3 with nukes because no one will win, however with other wmds there can still be a victor and the united states isnt the only country with that capability. |
| SeizeForce | Sunday, December 18, 2016 - 10:36 am
I'm talking about in-game theinventor.
But, there are a lot of other countries that are taking our jobs like Mexico and South America. Nuke them. |
| Ya.henrique123239 | Sunday, November 26, 2017 - 08:49 pm
Brazil is losing jobs to Asian countries and the Middle East with capital migrating to Asia. |
