I understand that Loki, and that is my major concern. As I have said though, I have messaged him and invited him to our federation. As with many other players on here, if they don't get a response after a while, they will take it as being inactive.
If however, he is active as his countries suggest and he responds - he will be more than welcome to join Valde Subsidium in one of my branches and will be free to make this choice. He will not be strong armed into joining us.
As mentionend previously, the thought of attacking an active player repulses me but I think that we will find this kind of thing happening more and more often as presidents look to subsidise their income. Perhaps I am the first to bring this subject up, but I can almost guarantee that I won't be the last.
I am basically a peaceful president who will not go to war without a good reason, and then I will still allow the president to keep their country after
Z
Zentrino (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
It seems to me that a player who is building an obviously nice little empire and not looking for war should just be left alone. So what if he isn't in a Fed. Maybe he doesn't want to bebothered with it. The fact the doesn't come to the forums only means he is not interested in the petty politics of this game. Some of us (myself included) enjoy the forums while other do not. I send messages to nearly every president in my region when they first sart. I get maybe 1 response for every 10 messages sent. So what if he does not reply. If he continues to play, maybe he just didn't like your message or wasn't interested in your offer. I ignore messages.
If we begin to tolerate even for a moment that wars against active, peaceful players are justified only to satsify a player's greed, then we have begun to unravel that which makes the game fun. I daresay it makes us hypocrites all as well.
Have we forgotten what we were tau
J
Jack Frost (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
Profits:
CEO 95 Corps: 40B - 50B
Main: 220B
Slave 1: 160B
Slave 2: 120B
Slave 3: 60B
Stuart must be horrible at the Economic side of the game as 2/3 of my slaves are war slaves.
With Regards,
Dragoon
S
Stuart Taylor (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
lol dude - i'm ok with it but I WAS running fully activated. Things are starting to level out a bit more now I have started do deactivate some weapons.
But, i'm still way down on what I was making
I would consider attacking an active player, if I thought that I could win and that I could turn a nice profit by doing so.
However, due to Valde Subsidium's stance on attacking players, I will not do so on Little Upsilon.
People who are calling it theft should take a step back and consider that SimCountry is a strategy game and that defensive armies exist for a reason.
F
FarmerBob (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
Remember the recent changes to the war engine. Raiding will prove to be much more expensive than in the past.
It is a valid tactic, however. Every player is responsible for their own security.
P
Pathetic Sheep (White Giant)
All worlds
Farmerbob,
Unless the engine changed again without my noticing it the cost will not go up, at least not very much. The way you go about it will have to change.
Stuart,
Simcounty is a competitive game. Prizes are given to countries with strong economies and high indexes. When a player scores high without a military he/she is taking a shortcut at the expense of other players. You can not get into the top 50 without bumping someone else out of the top 50. The markets, cash market and in game markets are competitive. You take profits that someone else could take.
A country which advances without buying a military could be called a cheater. I do not believe it is cheating. It is gambling. He/she decided to take a risk. There is a chance that no one will notice the lack of military. That chance was taken and you noticed.
Obviously you are also taking a risk. The target may recover and get even. He/she mig
K
Keto (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
Stuart, he/she could be an experienced player who his ticked off at the GM, as are a number of Vets, who decided to lay back for awhile to see how the game turns out after a few RL months, with all the recent changes.
I can think of a player recently who was inactive because of RL personal issues, who returned to find a few countries taken from him by another member. How do you think he felt?
P
Petra Arkanian (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
"The question is; What would you do? Would you raid an active player for no other reason apart from the fact that you want what he has got? "
Let me tell you the story of Badmudder...
S
shaun (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
my 2 cents not that it matters tis a game we pay to play and should all do what we want to enjoy it whatever that means and thats why we can purchase war protection and are assured 1 secure mode nation and have a community of other players who can help us boycott and financially hurt war mongers
but i personaly feel economic strategy comes first in this strategy game, war is another strategy that comes 2nd as in real life wars should not be common but huge long costly and more for status and politics than anything else.
these war engine changes are to get some of the older players to disarm a bit to put them on a more even footing with all us newer players. they have had time as much as 2 years more than us for stockpiling ammo that takes hundreds of trillions of in game dollars not to mention real life time to order in small quantities for us.
ammo is ridiculous expensive and having large active armies takes up a lot of work
Z
Zentrino (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
Economic players can't really "cheat" their way to the top and into rewards. Your level is calculated into your score. In the top 20, only 1 person is a level 1 and only 2 are level 2. In fact, 8 of the top 12 are level 5, which requires an overall DI of 100. Only 2 of the top 15 are level 3. I happen to be one. It is not, however, because I have "cheated" on the military. In fact, it is because I still sit at 84% employment after taking 3 new countries 2 weeks ago. I estimate I have had 20 private corps added to my empire in the past week and my employment percent has not budged. If someone could figure that out, I would be happy!
Heres a FEW things the Warmongers amoung us SHOULD consider Proir to Armed conflict..
True the WAR end of this Games there however,
War is the reciprocal and violent application of force between hostile political entities aimed at bringing about a desired political end-state via armed conflict.......
..at bringing about a desired political end-state .....
{Whats the desired Political End}
War is not considered to be the same as occupation, murder, or genocide because of the reciprocal nature of the violent struggle, and the organized nature of the units involved.
the reciprocal nature
{ Do they Have a Military to Resist you? if not then it maybe Immoral of you to Attack }
War is also a cultural entity, and its practice is not linked to any single type of political organization or society....war is a universal phenomenon whose form and scope is defined by the society that wages
A
Aaron Doolavay
All worlds
@Petra, I recall the name Badmudder but but whats his story?
F
FarmerBob (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
SimConsiderations for warfare:
Is it profitable?
Will I get away without retaliation?
That was a nice discourse, Grayson, but SC tends to be a bit less collegiate and a little more prison yard.