| Lord Mndz | Wednesday, April 1, 2020 - 05:56 pm 
Hi,
probably many players have reached +10k points in their Sc careers, but who has reached -10K?
 |
| Andy | Thursday, April 2, 2020 - 02:18 pm
wow
this is a deep whole to climb from.
probably after winning many high awards.
Increase welfare by 10 points and game level to 6 and it will become positive again. |
| Andy | Thursday, April 2, 2020 - 02:25 pm
We will make the score even more dependent on the game level and the welfare index.
Population will be more important too.
The total score might even come closer to the total of the scores on that page.
We waited for a new month to prevent interfering with the score after the middle of the month.
will include in a next update within several days. |
| Lord Mndz | Thursday, April 2, 2020 - 06:07 pm
Andy,
the biggest problem with these negative points is that people no longer challenging each other to become better presidents as there is no list which shows/defines being good or not. best presidents list is only used for award mechanism, you can call it award list but not the best presidents list.
When I joined this game many years ago, best presidents rank was really important as it showed who is best, who knows most and who to follow, who to learn from it was important part of the game. Today in the first places we see new players and all experienced players are at the bottom. There is no prestige to be in first places, and it is impossible as you can see.
If you need to keep this list for awards mechanism, can you then create any other list showing which presidents are really doing good? That would create some interest in competition.
You are very clever guys, please do something to fix this vacuum. |
