Simcountry is a multiplayer Internet game in which you are the president, commander in chief, and industrial leader. You have to make the tough decisions about cutting or raising taxes, how to allocate the federal budget, what kind of infrastructure you want, etc..
  Enter the Game

Transformation of the IF

Topics: Suggestions: Transformation of the IF


Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - 03:15 am Click here to edit this post
The IF should be transformed into a sovereign wealth fund into which the government can invest aswell as take money.... pensions should be given a purpose or just done away with... thoughts?

John Martinez

Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - 03:20 am Click here to edit this post
change the amount seniors get for a pension to more or less. that would give it a use and it could be a new factor in your welfare, the more you give seniors for pension the more your welfare is affected and vice versa and obviously it would affect your economy too.


Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - 05:36 am Click here to edit this post
The IF should not be a piggy bank for the government. It is interesting in its role as a private investment entity for workers and some players, including I, enjoy the aspects of managing the fund without trivializing it by allowing unlimited transfers with government funds.

I have suggested a limited transfer ability to help funds get started though. Something like allowing a government transfer to increase the fund to a maximum value of $2T.


Wednesday, August 28, 2013 - 01:14 am Click here to edit this post
trivializing it? i dont see how it could be anymore trivialized considering the miniscuality of the returns.... already players can manipulate the IF to their liking so long as they have 2 countries or a CEO or *gasp* a multi account..... what im saying is the exact oppiosite.... give the IF an important meaningful place in the game.... i still really dont see the point of a pension


Wednesday, August 28, 2013 - 01:28 am Click here to edit this post
Running multiple countries or the addition of running a CEO is not trivial. With smart management, you can see a gradual rise of value of your funds over several weeks time. Not to mention the additional account costs of a CEO or the additional considerations of having additional countries (such as considering defenses or watching your war level).

Raiding a few countries in twenty minutes and injecting trillions into your investment funds is trivial. I do not see the comparison. Perhaps you can explain.

Add a Message