 |
|
|
|
Wednesday, January 21, 2015 - 09:50 am  I really like the basic concept of this game and a lot of their features. I don't know if this have been discussed before, but what I miss most are specific power rankings that would show how well I am doing compared to others. The existing score system doesn't say much. For example, I've been in the top of this existing ranking in the first month and after receiving awards I am low in rankings although my countries are actually better than they were before. In this light it would be very interesting if there were different rankings. For example: most countries in an empire, most population, highest welfare and so on. This way everyone could choose their specific interest in the game and try to be the best in a specific field.
| |
| Wednesday, January 21, 2015 - 01:52 pm Like this? https://www.simcountry.com/discus/messages/8/24236.html?1413825997
| |
| Wednesday, January 21, 2015 - 02:44 pm Yes, like this, thank you. For example, someone wants to have most countries in an empire. At the moment he can't see how he is doing compared to other players. Someone else will want to be the richest. Someone else will want to have "happiest population" (highest welfare for example). And so on... What I really miss in this game is a comparison on how well I am doing compared to others which of course directly connects to competition between players. I imagine it wouldn't be difficult to implement something like this but would, from my point of view, enormously enhance the gameplay value. Because at the moment I am asking myself, why am I playing this game? :-) From my point of view it has to be some kind of competition, otherwise I will get bored quickly.
| |
| Sunday, February 15, 2015 - 04:44 pm This is actually a great suggestion. More leaderboards for specific fields of excellence should be a great addition.
| |
| Sunday, February 15, 2015 - 07:23 pm I really like Aries Power Rankings suggestion. Thanks Jonni for seeing how great this could be for the game and the players.
|
