| Crafty | Tuesday, October 2, 2012 - 11:01 pm 
Windsor on FB is losing population at a pop level of 44M. Surely this level of pop, 44M, is still small enough to have natural growth. Its not a really old country, hasnt sold any pop, has a health index of 140.
I think this is too low for a country with reasonable health and welfare to be losing population already. |
| Keto | Wednesday, October 3, 2012 - 07:23 am
Game Gods at work again! |
| sbroccoli | Wednesday, October 3, 2012 - 11:48 am
But how does the welfare in the neighbour contries look? If one of them is Nirvana, maybe emigration is still an option? |
| Crafty | Wednesday, October 3, 2012 - 07:06 pm
The migration index is 62 and 1637 emmigrated (immigrated?) last month. My neighbours are all C3s except one which is mine and virtually a duplicate of Windsor. It too loses pop at this level.
The game says the number of hospitals required for good quality is 375, I have 560 in that country. So much for the good quality advice. Of course it's not that simple, I have to consider age spread, but the death rate shows a greater rate for the older the people get and the population spread shows greater numbers of young people than old, including the ones of birthing age.
Over 60M ish I can understand keeping the population numbers steady should be harder, but at 40 odd million...? Haha, maybe I should close all my high risk corps like mining and chemicals! |
| Crafty | Thursday, October 4, 2012 - 08:19 pm
Ker-bump |
| SuperSoldierRCP | Friday, October 5, 2012 - 02:50 pm
GM just looking for new ways to hoover are GC/ cash/ pop |
| Crafty | Saturday, October 6, 2012 - 09:50 pm
Yeah, well, thanks SS, but I was kind of hoping for a more definitive answer, maybe a GM comment...? |
