Simcountry
Forum General Jozi Chat, 10th of January

Jozi Chat, 10th of January

S
ShcyzMattiCa (Little Upsilon)
08 Jan 2009 15:26 Link
Even IF they did change the system , what would that change? I still pay 30 gc a month, and take a look at KB I took 4 c3s in quick fashion just the same with a newly acquired c3. There is no difference, except you will be able to intimidate those who would cringe in fear of losing an imaginary country . . I not being one of them. If you don't believe me, i will make you a believer. For instance look at all the crying that has taken place becuase I have relentlessly attacked aggressive VETS and their war slave nations. Imagine me being able to make war against your prized mains with all those luuvly finance indexes with almost no weapons in them. Sure DOWN WITH SECURED MODE< by all means execute this great idea. Also, imagine all the children I could destroy until I have enough assets to attack you by your supposed level system, if I never managed to break the threshold, how would anyone worthy intervene to stop me from plucking the kiddies from their basinets? Care to find out, I do now.
J
Jack Frost (Little Upsilon)
08 Jan 2009 16:00 Link
Danneh Turner,
notice how I said an Option as in like a little box somewhere that you could place a check mark in? read and comprehend somewhat before you comment next time please.

Wendy,
Quite frankly it wouldn't matter as I have always kept a defensive army within my main.

With Regards,
Dragoon
W
WildEyes (Little Upsilon)
08 Jan 2009 16:29 Link
Would everyone PLEASE lay off wendy. This isn't the thread for it and it detracts from the point at hand.
B
BorderC (Kebir Blue)
08 Jan 2009 17:21 Link
Maybe they should just keep a single world, like WG or GR, with the Secure & WP option. That way people who only want to play the economic side of the game, or are worried about losing their investment have some place to build. That would make them more unique and attractive to players. It would also give them a stable region to build their account so they can afford to be on the less secured worlds.


BC
D
Danneh Turner (Fearless Blue)
08 Jan 2009 17:35 Link
Jack, I was pointing out that your idea was poor, or at least incomplete, whether it was optional or not. I figured that you hadn't comprehended why the mail system is as it is today (this is not an insult - why would you know unless you were here when the previous system was in place?); so I explained why mail goes to a 'main' country. In fact, mail is seperate from countries and is merely accessed by the main country (as the main country can change).

If you would like to expand your idea to take account of the possibilities of slave countries being captured or deregistered with unread or undeleted mails, then it would be a better suggestion to put towards the devs.
P
Princess FluffyBritches (Little Upsilon)
09 Jan 2009 02:25 Link
Aye!
K
Keith Allaire (Little Upsilon)
09 Jan 2009 03:09 Link
We should have an option that would CC mail to receiving slaves instead. Best of both worlds.
J
John R
10 Jan 2009 00:16 Link
The meeting is tomorrow.
J
John R
10 Jan 2009 02:03 Link
Oh, I should mention this as it is an invaluable lesson and piece of history:

Secured Mode came as a half-joke during one of the Jozi Chat's from Zoltar's mouth.

Be careful with what you say.


I wonder if I can find the exact log for that meeting...
J
John R
10 Jan 2009 15:45 Link
Meeting be now.