W3C - Expected Updates This Month

1. The level upgrades will now be executed immediately when you check the indexes page. If all conditions are met, the level will be increased. The waiting time to the next month processing will be eliminated.

2. New Icons on the country maps that are now available, will be implemented on the maps. This change will have a major influence on the appearance of all maps in peace and in war time.

3. Mobile Units will be completed. The implementation was delayed before and the units will be added to Simcountry this month.

Yes, Yes, and meh...

I have 2 Questions

#1 when will Q effect navies?
#2 can something be done to increase fed fighting abilities. Resently i had a member(s) of my fed decced. Even though i signed the war dec i couldnt help them becuase the attacker was war level 3 and i was war level 6. Can something be done about it, IT MAKES NO SENCE. why just becuase im a single level higher that i should be FORBIDDEN from helping my allies. Granted i understand the reason behind not allowing higher levels to gang up on lower level players but being Decced APOWN should have no effect. Id like to ask is- Can something about this be changed?

Change in Question is this.
When a member of a fed is attacked can ALL players who sign the war dec REGUARDLESS of level be able to counterdec and help defend there ally?

SuperSoldier makes sense to me..

Wrong Supersoldier. You knew the consequences of moving up war levels.

You moved up war levels after I dropped a country on your border. You made the comment about me attacking only 'n00bs' So I tried to change my evil ways and declare on you since you 'say' I only declare on n00bs.

For the record, the ONLY player you have ever attacked was a n00b, and you had two other players help you with that to boot.

On the other hand, my list of engagements include the who's who of war fighters. I won't ever be able to say that about you. And that is a FACT.

You have to live with the choices you make in the game. You move up, you moved up end of story. You're not a n00b, you should have known that by now, right?

You wouldn't have ever had to move up the war levels if you hadn't provoked me by spreading lies.

The statement would have been more accurate if you had said, "The o

^
Looks like sum one hasn't took there vitamin s

Lord NoobTune, please mind your manners

I doubt you are really qualified to antagonize me.

Well I'm sure I'm on Wendyloo's list of Who's Who of Fighters! Yes, boys, you mind your manners or not only will you incur da wrath of Wendy, you have ME to worry about! If nukes won't get ya, my shoes will! Be warned. *laughs evilly

My only Q to you wendy is if YOUR so experienced why do you stay @ war level 3 fighting the lower war level players SURELY someone of YOUR skill would benefit so much more from war level 11.

----------On topic of my original post------------

My point does stand. What happens should a it be 2-3 people vs another fed, or 1 country vs and empire. Why shouldn't a fed be allowed to help? Feds do need to teach people how to grow and prosper but at the same time they ALSO need to be able to lend a helping hand when necessary.

Im not saying to change the war levels, leave them as is but if someone is attacked the only time a higher level should fight a lower level is in the defence of a fedmate. Otherwise what would be the point? A few extra airwings is helpful but adds no real punch.

I would beg to differ Sweet noob

Watch yourself

War levels don't prove your worth in war

Don't get cute on me sweetpea

It's not right you have to sit and watch a fedmate get attacked and can't do a thing about it.

Get to war level 3 Lord n00btune, I'll make quick work of you and teach you some humility in the process. You won't make a name over here, just a reputation for stupidity.

I welcome your challenge. As a matter of fact, I would have loved for Super and you, and 5 of his best allies to whip up on. I'm a bit rusty but I always enjoy a challenge.

And Super, I challenged your lies. You ducked, you dodged.

I have said since war levels were introduced they were BS. The only way to get that point across, is to not participate in them. If you want to play chase the ladder, you go right ahead.

It was so-called vets like you that cried for their implementation, now you got what you asked for.

when did i ask for them, infact i opposed them i still do, I think someone didnt take her meds today. Its ill take care of you in your old age.

Wow, just wow.

SillySoldier, I could probably pull 10s of quotes on your promoting the subject of war levels using the search function. But why waste the time? We both know the truth.

The issue here is like every other thing that doesn't conform to everything you want, you want the gms to change any and everything.

Is Dubeltar catering to your every desire? I doubt it, and I doubt he'll start.

All i hear was whine whine i'm throwing a tantrum, why don't you get your ba ba and sit in the corner, i'm in a business meeting with people who matter. So ya we need change this whole fed thing

Super, the issue was discussed several times. It is getting old. You want to be able to help a player at war level 3 fight a level 3 opponent while avoiding declarations from level 3 players.

Explain to us how this logic makes sense? Or not... because it doesn't.

This again, is a clear case of you wanting to fight lesser opponents, outnumber that opponent as well, and shield yourself at the same time using war levels. Typical n99b bashing mentality you have always displayed. You have zero desire to fight any qualified opponent and never will.

You moved up to avoid war deal with it.

you know, this is one of those times, i can tell you it was great to be the fly on the wall...

Sweetpea is it?

Eat your heart out
U talk a good game
this is going to be fun....
I won't make a name for myself she saids (*pitty*) she knows not who she angers

Stay focus old boy

(*saids to self*)

Soldier needs to be able to help his fedmate regardless of these war levels. Whoever attacked soldiers fedmate should have thought of that before s/he declared, just like we always have had to. Check you can deal with the whole fed first.

Only a higher level player can attack soldier directly or vice versa. Soldier cannot have a lower level fed member declare on a level 3 just so he can join in hence bypassing the war level rule.

This is how it should be. If you decide to attack someone you should have to remember that you may need to be at war with any fed member regardless of their war level.

SweetPea. I see it as a real issue. I know what you are saying about it but an open discussion about it without individual case analysis might be helpful to the GM and the war game. Respect as always.

Crafty.

My point is, it would be much easier, if SuperSoldier would help his mate by sharing the way he too avoided war.

If that player rose to Super's war level, he could help him. Much simpler than trying to code a solution.

It would have been even better if Supersoldier never left his fedmate at that lower level to begin with.

Super was aware of that player's war level when he rose, and he was more than capable of taking him up the war levels with him.

This is a matter of choices in the game. It shouldn't involve new features, new rules, more work for the gms with so much already on the plate.

That is my point here.

LordNoobtune.... I don't care who you are, or who you were, you can drop down on whatever planet I am at war level and fight me anytime.

I talk a lot because players like you only do so, and never step up. It is a game, come and see me, please.

Like I said, you Super and the whole lot of you. Come one come all, I need to sharpen my game anyway.

And my point is I see the suggestion as a refinement of an existing rule, not a new one.

The original WL rule being implemented has brought this situation to light and highlighted its negative impact on federation protection.

It deserves consideration as I'm sure no one had any intention of disabling federation abilities. The idea was to stop the perceived bullying of new players and chasing them off the game.

Like you say Wendy, it's a game of choices, and to ask fed members to remain at the same war level removes a choice from them. Some like Soldier may like the war, others in the same fed may prefer econ.

Why shouldn't they mix?