Simcountry
Forum General Historical Rehash #2 (Fearless Blue)

Historical Rehash #2 (Fearless Blue)

D
Darke Katt (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
08 Jun 2009 20:24Link
Welcome to part two.

What if...

What if the British had granted the Thirteen Colonies representation in parliament? What if the American Revolution had never happened?

Discuss.
T
The High Profitess (Golden Rainbow)

All worlds
08 Jun 2009 21:26Link
We would have PwneD England thru parliament, as we had to in the war.

Cup 0' Tea?
V
Vincent22

All worlds
09 Jun 2009 03:41Link
we still would have revolted to far away to ever get to a vote on time and we would have been out voted anyway (we never wanted to be a part of their parliament)

if we were a part of parliament back then their be no united states of america. it would proboly be a bunch of different countrys here. and no electricity or computer or ways of mass communication that we have today.
P
Pope Samtator IX

All worlds
09 Jun 2009 04:45Link
The Republic of Texas would have invaded in 1837...
D
Darke Katt

All worlds
09 Jun 2009 06:03Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

we still would have revolted to far away to ever get to a vote on time and we would have been out voted anyway (we never wanted to be a part of their parliament)<!-/Quote-!>



The American colonies were relatively close compared to other parts of the British Empire. So this assessment is somewhat erroneous.

And the whole revolution was over taxation without representation, so this becomes a moot point anyway.

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

and no electricity or computer or ways of mass communication that we have today.<!-/Quote-!>



None of those are American discoveries/inventions.

Electricity was loosely known about since about 2700BC, and effectively "discovered" in 1600 by William Gilbert.

The "computer" was invented in 1837 by Charles Babbage. Computer Science (mod&#
P
Pluto (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
10 Jun 2009 01:21Link
It is Almost Possible to Suggest also that if the American Colonialists were granted representation, then we could be Under Anglo-american governermentship today , or possibly around the 18 th century, although it is also possible another French/Indian war saw by the actual colonialists could of come to fruition ,
V
Vincent22 (White Giant)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 03:51Link
first of all the revolution wasnt just about taxes read the bill of rights.

second electricity was created and harnessed by Thomas Edison. and sold and mass prodused by him in the free capitalistic market of america all of those invetions couldnt be made with out him. american industrys mass produce all those products. makeing them cheap to buy for every one also the united states government subsidize most of those industry for defence and communications of a very large country

thrid and how can you say relasions would be less comative. why wouldnt english french and spanish fight for the untaped resourse of the rest of america? throw in the native americans and all of the immagrents(alltho they could have died or change their homeland) add slaves the melting pot of america would be a blood bath
K
Kiteless (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 07:22Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

second electricity was created and harnessed by Thomas Edison. and sold and mass prodused by him in the free capitalistic market of america all of those invetions couldnt be made with out him. american industrys mass produce all those products. makeing them cheap to buy for every one also the united states government subsidize most of those industry for defence and communications of a very large country<!-/Quote-!>



Benjamin Franklin, Alessandro Volta and Michael Faraday had all successfully experimented with electricity in different ways long before Thomas Edison invented the light bulb.
I
IndustMech (White Giant)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 11:03Link
Tesla invented 3 Phase AC.

And a way to transmit electicity wirelessly.

And the vibrator.
P
Pope Samtator IX (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 17:59Link
Tesla made modern life possible.

Not only did he discover alternating current he also designed the electromagnetic motor and necessary components to use his discovery.

His patents cover most of what makes the modern world function.

He was perhaps the single most gifted engineering mind the world has ever known.
D
Darke Katt (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 19:36Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

first of all the revolution wasnt just about taxes read the bill of rights.<!-/Quote-!>



The Bill or Rights does nothing more than place many age-old concepts of English Common Law into a written document. Their precedents predate America by many hundreds of years.

The colonies began their revolt against the crown over high taxes without the right to representation.

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

second electricity was created and harnessed by Thomas Edison. and sold and mass prodused by him in the free capitalistic market of america all of those invetions couldnt be made with out him. american industrys mass produce all those products. makeing them cheap to buy for every one also the united states government subsidize most of those industry for defence and communications of a very large country<!-/Quote-!>



Firstl
1
117000 (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 20:32Link
The American Revolution did inspire other revolutions in which a democratic or a republican government was setup with the peoples' rights in mind.
B
BorderC (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
11 Jun 2009 21:12Link
Okay, okay. We get it. The British Empire was important 200 or 300 years ago!

Sheesh!

:P
V
Vincent22 (White Giant)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 01:17Link
the british empire was importaint but the fall of it was more important. most empires dont like change. like the napolianic wars and ect.

Edison is the grandfather of electrcity. he wasnt a scientist or buissnessman like everyone else mentioned. he dropped out of grammer school to work in a trainyard and eventually invented an entire industry selling power and uses for it. also tesla work for him

so i dont think you could say anyone else would of done it or even say he would have done everthing the same way in a british controlled colony if he still could have born (no dout american societ wold have been very different by then and its very possable his ancetorse would have been different, married other people, been killed moved somewhere eles, ect.)

therefore no electricity and every thing that comes withit
B
BorderC (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 01:37Link
I read somewhere or saw a documentary about how Edison stole all of Tesla's ideas. Tesla was had a lot of social issues, or something like that.
K
Kiteless (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 01:46Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Edison is the grandfather of electrcity. he wasnt a scientist or buissnessman like everyone else mentioned. he dropped out of grammer school to work in a trainyard and eventually invented an entire industry selling power and uses for it. also tesla work for him<!-/Quote-!>



1600 - English physician William Gilbert coins the term "electric" from the Greek word "elektron".

1752 - Benjamin Franklin performs his famous experiment in which he flies a kite during a thunderstorm, thus demonstrating the link between electricity and lightning.

1800 - Italian-born physicist Alessandro Volta creates the voltaic pile, later to become more commonly known as the electric battery; the first ever device to produce a steady electric current.

1831 - English scientist Michael Faraday creates the electric dynamo.

1847 - Thomas Edison born in Milan,
V
Vincent22 (White Giant)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 01:57Link
thats all samantics hes the one who made it practical
P
Petra Arkanian (White Giant)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 01:59Link
First of all, sEmantics...

second...

se·man·tics Listen to the pronunciation of semantics
Pronunciation:
\si-ˈman-tiks\
Function:
noun plural but singular or plural in construction
Date:
1893

1: the study of meanings: a: the historical and psychological study and the classification of changes in the signification of words or forms viewed as factors in linguistic development b (1): semiotic (2): a branch of semiotic dealing with the relations between signs and what they refer to and including theories of denotation, extension, naming, and truth 2: general semantics3 a: the meaning or relationship of meanings of a sign or set of signs ; especially : connotative meaning b: the language used (as in advertising or political propaganda) to achieve a desired effect on an audience especially through the use of words with novel or dual mean
P
Pope Samtator IX

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 02:12Link
Edison discovered Direct Current. Useful for batteries and low voltage. Not useful for high voltages or long distance transmission.

Tesla discovered Alternating Current which is what we use in modern electric transmission.

He held over 100 patents around the world covering a wide range of products.

His notes were confiscated by the US government upon his death mainly due to his research into resonance and long range wireless transmission of electricity.

Edison had a good press agent.
V
Vincent22 (White Giant)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 02:24Link
But tesla work for edison's company so would he have discover without his equipment and funding or would he have worked on something eles.


and for all the english teachers

phukc ,u as'wholes
P
Petra Arkanian (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 02:37Link
English is actually for everyone who speaks english.

And you have no evidence for thinking Tesla would have been SOL without Edison.

And why do you seem to be suggesting Edison would not have been around had we stayed British colonies? No United States doesn't mean North America (or a portion of it) got wiped off the face of the planet. Edison wouldn't have been able to come up with his patents if he had been a British citizen or colonial?

You're still an idiot and have not ceased being one, as I requested.

Edit: Nice edit. I'm keeping my post as it is to remind me of your further idiocy... "english is for english teachers" indeed. Dimwit.
V
Vincent22 (White Giant)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 04:55Link
tesla work for edison as a scientist where he came up with ac current. and considering he died poor regardless he wouldnt be able to fund his reserch and labratory without edison.
im not say edison couldnt exsist im saying that all of the factor leading up to his life and work wouldbe dramaticly change. mainly because the british colonys would be ran diferently the american ran it and also all the people who were to die in the revolutionary war would still be living and no dout change the society. they marry they would work eat live ect.ect.ect. that would have somesort of affect on edisons ancestors and there disions and edisons life. which would change what he does.


petra your a CUNT
not because you called me an idiot or critisied my crapy grammer its because you copied and pasted some long dumb post of how iwas wrong and annoy you. all you have to do is tell me what was wrong and how to correct it and i would. till then quit acting
P
Petra Arkanian (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 05:48Link
I somehow don't think you're qualified to conjecture about such fine nuances of an alternate timeline.

You don't know how dramatically his life would have changed, nor do you know anything about what effects would be caused from the casualties in the Revolution living instead of dying.

You obviously don't know anything about the history of electricity, based upon the overwhelming evidence presented by other parties in this thread.

Nor do you allow room for the chance that another Edison might emerge. Someone would do what he did eventually... or if we're playing around with conjectures about alternate timelines... well, maybe without the strife and growing pains after the Revolution, the colonies would have developed more quickly! Then we would have had electricity sooner and the world would be BETTER! You have no weight behind your claims. They're not even intelligent conjecture. It's rubbish, the lot
D
Darke Katt (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 13:44Link
I'd also like for us to consider the ramifications for other parts of the world had Britain and the US remained part of the same entity.

How would the various wars (Napoleonic, 19th century) have gone differently if the combined resources had been present from the very beginning?
B
BorderC

All worlds
12 Jun 2009 15:49Link
Hard to say since so many of America's leaders at the time were Francophiles. The Napoleonic Wars may have pushed America closer to independence.

But, if the US became independent 20 or 30 years later it wouldn't have had the uniting figure of Washington, the genius of Hamilton, and people like Madison may have never had the chance to take part in writing the Constitution.

So, we could have had a much different outcome on our side of the Atlantic.