Combination of countries

Ur funny

So still a now on the original thought then?

How about some trains Andy?

/runs away

-JWUrton

won't happen. GM has a strange perspective on this issue. You could type up an amazing essay with great reasons to consider, suggestions, examples, etc.. it won't matter. The GM's heels are dug in and will never budge for whatever reason. Do I believe that combining countries would add a fun dynamic and appeal to an already stagnant game? You betcha. But it won't be allowed. Their reasons make no sense. But don't bother debating it. That's why I suggest shutting this thread down; I'm sorry.

If anything they give pause for thought

Hopefully

Trains, you say?

We have train tracks.....Why not trains?

Trains are to modern.

Those train tracks are only for hand pushed carts.

I want powered infantry.

I like the fact i can fly with my arms.

Anyways there is such a good idea here, once again aries taking it home! (Orginal not on here in but in suggestions)

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

There is some merit here. For the most part, players run one country just like they run another. Having to log into each country and set similar settings again and again is tedious. There should be ways to manage multiple countries at once. Things like the "settings" and "automation" links at the top of the country page, trade strategies, and perhaps the ability to reactive military and such and more would be good. On the other hand, the option to set things for each state/country on a separate basis should be retained, as there are times where a certain state needs a different role or special attention.<!-/Quote-!>

Long explanation short instead of fucking me where is doesent count

oh and PS:


Lovely how off the topic is!! as if any of that really matters to reality we know today.

Corn is in cattle feed, my god i cant believe those bulls are shooting bullets!!!!! boozka shotgunners on the loose!

I want police

I want trains also.

I want aircraft specialized in train "busting".