Level 7- C3 weapons Q (Fearless Blue)

At Q 230. My airforce attack and bombing wing lost over 2000 Precision bombers and a lot of drones, planes but still not clear a c3 airwings at war level 4. it is suck. time to rethink

Trinh try using fighter planes with bombers, you will lose no fighter planes per attack providing you have enough bombers in each wing.

I can take the ints down in a lvl7 c3 with just under 1000 bombers.

Has anybody noticed that the cost to take a lvl 7 C3 has came back down to previous levels? Or is it just me? It seems to have gone back down a few days ago, which is very very nice! Thanks Mr GM!!!

Seems the same to me TNT.
I justed attacked with 200Fighting n lost 100bombers plus Fighers. Thats alot of losses and i barely broke there garrisons n killed only 200inters. (that's around 200B+ for a single attack)

"I can take the ints down in a lvl7 c3 with just under 1000 bombers"
You have chosen to build a corporation that will produce Precision Bombers.
The maximum production of such a corporation is 24 bombers per year. Assuming there are enough resources to build this corporation.

Reason WHY WEAPONS CORPS NEED TO MAKE MORE!!! double production = double weapons/half the price easier to supply for wars and if they didnt cost 1B per bomber i wont worry about losing a ton in battle

bump

I took a level 7 C3 recently and found it not very much more difficult than a level 6 C3. A few more airwings, certainly, and the forts took one more hit each to take down, but other than that not very much difference between the two. I only used a little bit more ammo and lost fewer weapons.

Hugs and respect

Jo

'Reason WHY WEAPONS CORPS NEED TO MAKE MORE!!! double production = double weapons/half the price easier to supply for wars and if they didnt cost 1B per bomber i wont worry about losing a ton in battle'

Easy way to beat c3, raid, expand empires, increase capital, get bored, get bored, die of boredom.

If they cost a lot, you have to look at alternative ways to take out ints, helis, garrisons etc. I'm not as advanced as you in c3 war, (only wl 5), but i've never used PBs and i've done fine... Only time can tell if i'll REALLY need them, and if there are cost effective ways of taking out a c3.

actually the only good thing is the amount of PB's needed as decoys. The time it takes is allot longer though due to the more targets it takes. As in, used to be one full point for a fort, it is now .85, also the number of air wings, even though they are much smaller, there is many more of them. Add that to the fact that the booty went from 15T to 12T really hurts. It is still profitable, but almost getting to the point its not worth your while. I really hope the new war levels will change all this and bring c3 warring back to a very profitable venture.

...Bump...

I have an honest Q for the GM. Whats being done to help players in the upper war levels?

Level 7-C3 the fighting level is 230
There's around 20 interceptor wings.(10helis wings)
60Forts instead of 50(now you need to blow up 26-28forts).
With units shrinking it seems like they are getting harder to destroy. Players have to pay for our weapons and ammo and yet the amount of ammo used per attack is increasing. It takes 1000tanks/1000artillery - 2attacks on a capital to destroy it (28Billion if 100Q ammo is used), If you had to use cruise missiles that number jumps massively. 100batteries use 500missiles per attack totaling 40B if 100Q ammo is used. The Q of ammo only decreases the number of missiles used not how much damage it does to the target.

Then on top the cash has dropped from 15T to 12T(20% drop).
Players used to get large amounts of ammo 80-90K Anti air, Missile