W3C - New players in the first 360 game months

Cost will decline with the size.
if you have watched the size of the army lately, you should have seen a decline in the number of soldiers and officers.

Offensive weapons cost and maintenance was always much higher than the cost of the defensive army.
it should be cheaper to defend but I also agree that the cost of the offensive army should decline more.

i did notice the offensive change, got allot of 400k mlm out of now where, a very necessary change, and much thanks

Tommi, will the reduction in weapon losses apply equally to offensive units and defensive units?

Tommi

Is there any plans to fix weapons well the GM is reducing weapons numbers? Under the suggestions (called altering weapons) scarlet did make a valid point. Some weapons are either very weak, unneeded, or just it seem like their there for show.

Anti Tank Missile Batteries(most wars are airbased so a weapon for just tanks is really unneeded)
Land to Sea Missile Batteries(i tested them took over 1000 to sink a carrier, keep in mind it was undefended)
Off Anti Aircraft Missile Batteries(really weak due to the fact that helis tear them up. Plus by the time helis are down these are rather worthless because the air force is down)
Guided Missiles(just like cruise)
Seals Units(I tested them took over 5K of them to clear/destroy a carrier with 2K navy missile/navy def batteries ).

Scarlet made this comment and i agree.

OAAMB could use a small (20%) firepo

for one, dont take a weapon, away, if it is useless as it is, give it a slight bumb. but OAAMB *REALLY* need a serious upgrade. just increasing their missiles per turn would be huge.

ID10Ts

Very constructive and helpful Hymy, thankyou.