Idea (Little Upsilon)

How about if you declare on an active player, your slaves cannot be placed into war protection, especially the one that was used to declare in the first place.

Honestly, the whole idea sounds like spam. No one is going to agree on anything period. Just leave the game as it is and continue playing what you signed up to play. Meanwhile instead of worrying about further changes to the game that weren't planned for, W3 can continue putting in features that have already been promised and are on the back log. Try bringing this idea up again after major additions like space trading are put in, it has been talked about for months but we aren't close to having it yet.

That was kind of the original idea a few weeks ago Wendy and it's still something that I'd like to see done at least on FB and I know others share that sentiment.

I am noticing as well that it is hard to get people to agree on things...or even to stick to the same topic, things kind of seem to spin from one place to another and I understand how that can happen. I honestly thought the original idea in the thread would be liked by a lot of people with some changes here and there but the general idea would be accepted and I was thinking it would be fairly easy to implement unlike other things that you mentioned such as space trading.

Anyway...it seems like somewhat of a lost cause at this point but hearing all of your opinions is great...if anyone has anything else to share I'm sure everyone reading would still like to hear from you.

I go along with Inanna's idea to leave the war engine as it is. My enemies know by now that if they declare on any of my slaves they may profit momentarily but In the long run they will lose more than they gained. My last enemy tired of warring after a month and a half and I was kind enough to offer him a peace treaty after he returned some of my lost assets. His Rat Pack reluctantly gave me a peace treaty that prevents them for declaring on me without first revoking the treaty.