| Electric Components | 140000 | 158 | 1782 | 1148 | 2
C
CorporatePartner
All worlds
No. These formulas are not correct: First, when a corporation has "last price paid", that can still average with other supplies already in stock. As an estimate, it may actually be Ok, because usually auto-orders do occur when supplies are low or very low. Still, there is margin for errors there. Next, the corporation at greater than 100% utilization, uses (based on observation and rough calculations) to also use more supplies. This further can be confirmed by the cotracting (auto-contracts) which will show "100%" contracted for supplies, but then still come up short of what is needed. Finally, if you check the supply levels, month-over-month, they do not all drop by exactly one-world-month amounts...it's usually something like 1.1 for enterprise corporations, fully upgraded, using roughly 300 salaries and located in "free countries" aka 'Simcountry' owner. Finally, it is useful
I think I compensated for utilization by multiplying each product by utilization. For example with "Chemicals" I multiplied: 20,000 * 3262 * 1.189 to get the cost of 77570360. I assumed that a corporation with 118.9% utilization would use 118.9% of the quoted supplies. In the case of Chemicals (20,000) the real usage would be 23780. Is this wrong? The averaging of new supply prices with existing ones does present a slight problem.
C
CorporatePartner
All worlds
Well, most likely it's wrong for every product, but, yes, that would help improve the estimate. It may actually do the converse, and error on the other side...so, actualy raw material amount usage increases may be say +8.5%, but, that formula would cause it to be +18.9%. For example, one of the largest costs is "maintenance", and that is not even included in that table. It is a supply like others, but just happens to be itemized differently. For that case, it has been observed almost always to not increase its usage with higher productivity %. Other supplies seem to vary, but only have in-direct evidence of that based on tracking common market contract %s. Maybe someone else has more details. In addition, the amount of supplies needed, and likely used (as a corollary), have been almost ceaselessly changing for a very long time. Even "Andy" admitted, to a degree, that this is still occurring. If you ask t
When I observed the information last game month, I pasted the entire "Available Materials" box into a spreadsheet... I just didn't include everything in the table here to save space. So here is a comparison of product stocks. New information from: March 11 2957 This month utilization is reported as 119.1% | Product | Stock (Feb) | Stock (Mar) | Used | Quoted | % of quoted | Last Price Paid | Cost | | | Chemicals | 154498 | 130687 | 23811 | 20000 | 119.0550% | 3262 | 77671482 | | | Electric Components | 1285791 | 1119110 | 166681 | 140000 | 119.0579% | 1782 | 297025542 | | | Electric Power | 14513 | 13620 | 893 | 750 | 119.0667% | 163998 | 146450214 | |
C
CorporatePartner
All worlds
Very nice...incisive. Did that happen with each corporation that you were referencing/watching (for this topic)? fyi: just checked some Oil corporations at different hiring/utilization levels (production level: 82.5/99.7/108.5), with same upgrades, similar countries, etc. and maintenance used appears equal. Materials costs also rose with increased utilization in all 3 as well (materials (Ms): 1429/1725/1886).
C
CorporatePartner
All worlds
Scarlet checked those Oils (in his countries) and actually they have not stabilized costs yet, due to being former State corporations...so, maybe can monitor them and report again later.
finance indexs appear too be dropping again wtf
Update: (Disclaimer: Obvious speculation is obvious.) Okay, we figured out that 'local trading' from enterprise to corporations (Space Inc) and 'direct trading' from corporations to corporations (tested corp in Overrike Manufacturing to corp in Space Inc) are bought at the correct price (as measured by change in cash levels). Whether this causes a reduction in the discrepancy of Raw Materials Cost between expected/actual numbers is unknown, but what is known is that these methods of selling to corps are working fine. If filling a corporation through these methods does not cause a reduction in the discrepancy, I believe that the Raw Materials Cost glitch is an error in the P&L value and not an error that manifests in the corporate cash flow. However, given observations of affected corporations, the latter is most likely the case. Regardless, most corporations do not buy their
If there was a glitch as you call it I feel sure it would have been addressed by now. So we are back to the 'complexity' of the game that the children enjoy, supposedly. In other words many of us dont understand it, but instead of saying so, point the finger of accusation at the the very thing they dont understand. Child like indeed. This has to be one of the most in depth threads and analysis of some game mechanics that I have seen, (with a surprisingly astute and coherent contribution from CP) and I wish you good luck in getting to the bottom of it.
I did not go into this because I saw some things like: "maybe it is the name change". come on. I can never claim for 100% that there is no error that depends on something "arbitrary" but we never had such an error before. My take on it is that there are indeed many parameters that make it very hard to predict and even more complex because all these parameters and processes have a built in delay and also depend on the existing data which is different from country to country and make the process proceed differently in each case. Keep looking. This is always interesting. I can add that when we make a complex change, like recently, we can in most cases predict the end result but we cannot always predict the path, the ups and downs on the way and the time it will take to get there.
Crafty, it isn't "real" complexity if it's just bad information. Take corporations selling their production to the world market. They NEVER sell for the "advertised" price. The difference is obvious enough that it can neither be accounted for by trade strategies or by changes in market price. Take a corporation that's been selling all its production to the world market, then contract its production to one of your countries and watch the graph. Timestamp: Aug 3178 Here are two corporations (same trade strategies [-1/-5], quality difference of 1.6, market price fluctuating in a range of 2%, both having sold all production in the last two months): Corporation: https://sim01.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/cgi2nova?SN_ADDRESS=wwwCountry&SN_METHOD=ccorp&miCorpNumber=11
Scarlet, sorry bud, but the market is not that cut and dried. This is one of the complexities that I talk of. By no means do I pretend to understand it but one of the main reasons for my continuing here is my enjoyment of trying to gain my best understanding of these fluffy complexities. One of the others is getting to talk to such wonder people as yourself
I've never seen a corporation sell to the world market even close to market price, much less above. Even in markets whose market price is rising: https://sim05.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/cgi2nova?SN_ADDRESS=wwwCountry&SN_METHOD=ccorp&miCorpNumber=2924557 Should be at least NEAR 6,102.97M accounting for production, trade strategy, and the current (i.e. higher) market price. Actual Value: 5,489.60M This is 10.05% lower than expected in a rising market. If the question is, what is market price? It is an inflated value used to determine the price of contracts and direct sales. It does not appear to have much to do with prices on the market. Find me a single corporation that sold its products at or above market price or even within 2% below market price and we can talk. Trade strategies are NOT tied to market price as advertised. This is not complexity because this essentially mean I have no idea what
Ok, now I have to believe Andy. Look at this for improved profit  I hope this continues every month, what do you reckon the chances are? WOW
Unlikely, that appears to be a temporary spike in Profit Transfer brought on by a "double month" of production sales in state corporations. It looks like your corps were selling on a one month delay, and are now selling on a zero month delay.
C
Christopher Michael Thompson
All worlds
Wow......I wish they would jump up like that.......and STAY. Scarlet is right however on this point.
Dunno scarlet, this is still unexplained. But going back to my graph...(yes I did realise that, thanks for the comments) that does show what a change in trade strategies can do in terms of selling promptly. I will be monitoring further months of income and see if an increase in profit is permanent.
C
Christopher Michael Thompson
All worlds
CC, didn't mean to be patronizing with my comment.....I see how that looks now.
Authentication Error By: (IP:188.92.75.82) You can only post messages if you are logged on as player of simcountry. You must also have a country in one of the worlds. New members can join the forum about 48 hours after registration. - If you login with email address and password at https://www.simcountry.com, you will post under your registered First- and Lastname.
- If you login as President or CEO in a simcountry world, the name of the world will be displayed with every Message that you post
or New Conversation that you start. This is preferred if you want to discus 'world' related subjects as Trade, Federations and Common Markets.
|