Kill whitey

seems to be a going chant. i'm white, thought i'd get your thoughts on the matter.

If you have any issues with the accelerating pattern of forced integration of white people in all white countries, and only white countries, by unrelenting movements of other peoples into your lands, then you must be a racist and a nazi, even though ironically your people the white people are being replaced by other groups of people from other countries where they have isolationist migration policies, last I checked the TV wasn't calling anybody racist but white people, because I think only white people can be "racists." If you're white then you are simply not authorized to share any views about race in any way, unless it's about how much faster you should be replaced by anybody but more people that look like you.

The reason is the more immigrants = more lending. The white people have already been bled dry from bankers during the past century, and now the bankers demand whatever different groups of people they can get, brown yel

Poor white people, we've always had it sooooo tough lol

So white peoples societies weren't "tough" enough, we should let various different groups of people from tough societies all over the world move in next door to me and culturally enrich our societies so that we can be tough as well. You should hand over your job to them also because it doesn't sound like you've had it tough enough.

That's the problem with white people, they build societies that aren't tough enough to prevent people from everywhere else from wanting move into the land of white people and displace white people. Fortunately for you who would rather we have not so weak societies, at present trajectories, there won't be white people in your not too distant future. . .so there won't be racist white people either !! and then we will have finally at last defeated racism ??? ha ha ha ha ha

good lord man what are you smoking?

I'll just say I don't believe hardly anything at all that I hear or see on mainstream sources such as television news and mainstream newspapers, and perhaps I look at the world a lot differently than most, hows that?

I can come down to your level and throw down a emotional response as well. One minute . . let me gather some "feelings" . . . .

OK I'm ready. What are YOU smoking man??

Was that good? How was that ? ? Oh man wasting some mind power to create some reactive emotional wavelengths to form a more relatable response to you is a drain that was almost exhaustive. I tried to make myself you know, more like you, specifically by that I mean more in tune with these useless mind processes that they call "feelings," which are almost always void of logic or reasoning, but generally allow for rapid statements based on no science or statistics, comprised entirely of positive or negative intended "emotio

what is this BS about?

Hey that is my Job.

EYE or I dont see about is what BS ?? we sure EYE or I is OK ???

ha ha never mind what I've said, I know I went too far again now sharing my perspectives in regards to white people. That wasn't PC of me in a politically correct PC game on the PC and I think most white people would disagree with my perspective anyway.

If you're listening to the TV, that's your problem right there.
John Wests's quotes ITT.
[quote]I'll just say I don't believe hardly anything at all that I hear or see on mainstream sources such as television news and mainstream newspapers[/quote]
[quote]last I checked the TV wasn't calling anybody racist but white people, because I think only white people can be "racists."[/quote] (sarcasm noted)
You don't believe "hardly anything at all" from MSM sources, yet you seem to have accepted the emotional content and let it cloud your judgement and color your opinions on the matter.

My take is that racism holds a prominent place in a perfect society; although this opinion usually meets with strong opposition. However, racism is highly effective at maintaining the integrity of racial and cultural 'enclaves'. Such enclaves of racial and/or cultur

I believe in true muliculturalism and diversity -that is all groups of people should have more than only some share of influence in different lands, but rather their own geography where their societies are not diminished to minority communities. Although I understand that this perspective is not the trendy way of looking at things that is usually encountered amongst most people of this last century, I however think people of this last century are on average dumber than at least the previous few centuries and that is somehow a contributing factor to this issue. When they eventually succeed in mixing everybody up, there will be no multiple cultures anymore, there will be only one worldwide culture, and the world as a whole will be less of a creative force interacting with different civilizations and an increasingly dull place to live where everybody is the same and inevitably part of the same one world civilization where inevitably there will be only one set

At the very least, we two agree on the problem. However, continuing to carve up the world into country sized portions is problematic - there's not enough room for both a world culture and diversity. This gives rise to the same problems of the past - nationalism, stateism, supremism, imperialism, exceptionalism, etc.. The nation state, based upon a culture and/or genetic traits, holds sway over too many people - harming too many for the benefit of the few. Unfortunately for me, my idea gives rise to the specter of a one world govt. limiting the influence and reducing the area of control of the nation/state. Most people don't like that idea.
I believe our species needs a social reorganization.

As we've turned this into an intellectual exercise, rather than an argument, feel free to express yourself.

Eddy Bernays, perhaps the most evil man who ever lived, wrote in his book, "Propaganda",
[quote] "

Edward Bernays was accurate, that's precisely what's going on right now !! haha

Not sure what the ongoing issue with race is on here -must be a lot of Americans on the forum.
When the robots take over it won't matter what race you are -as will all be a number -how's that? lol

Michael is right!
The singularity is nearing and cylons don't see color.

The people will accept that number and the mark that bestowed with it.

Indeed there actually is no color, that is an illusion of processing the presence of photons within a particular vibrational spectrum detected by rods and cones photoreceptor cells, and that vibrations trigger an elchemical reaction that is then converted into electronic wavelengths transmitted via biowiring into the electromagnetic fields in our heads aka brainwaves, which is then translated by a trick of the mind into what we perceive as colors, objects, etc.

Regardless of this process if I understand it accurately that is, to desire to control all [groups] of people is one thing, but to throw all people into the same group I believe will increase division and lower overall productiveness of said group, because I recognize there are measurable baseline behavioral tendencies beyond the immediate layer of illusion/perception specifically different overlapping ranges of adaptabilities depending on environments of the originating groups of pe

If only I could administer mild electric shocks to people through the internet.

Andy make it happen. You're my ace.

Says the one who bears the name of a group of social engineers . . . .as you did not specify I assume you directed that emotional response to me, the last one that had posted. .how am I not surprised . .

you can't fool all of the people all the time Mr BILDERBERG, you're just upset because some of us are onto you !! ! ! haha

and you are here, but don't you have some regime to switch out with your puppets somewhere ??

That's also something I see differently than most.
I see a common root to all manner of "social problems". Racism, racial supremacy, nationalism, exceptionalism; these are all the basic universal social more of loyalty gone awry - applied too fervently and/or inappropriately.
Loyalty, in it's most basic form, is universal; meaning it exists in all societies, in all people in one form or another - with the notable exception of psychopaths. (sorry for the lecture, folks). There is no loyalty more universal than that between mother and child. Which obviates the purpose of this loyalty - survival. Love supports loyalty. Which, in turn, promotes survival. But from there, we have loyalty (and loves) extended to ever larger groups of people; family, tribe, community, state, race, nation. At each level, we create an 'us V. them' mentality complete with different standards of treatment. This is perfectly natu

And sorry to burst your comparison, there. But two different hives of the same species of ant will attack each other. Even the slightest difference in their chemical language is enough to pit them against one another. It's like having every variation in the French language, no matter how slight the accent, is enough to make them instant enemies.

The Tazmanian Devil pandemic is a fine example of why the singularity (thank you, Jonni. I had forgotten the term) is undesirable. It also slows scientific progress and innovation. While it might cure racism, et. al., it exchanges one set of problems for another.

That is a very deep an interesting comment again from jdlech. I agree with all said with one exception. I will disassemble what you said where I disagree.

"But nationalism - the idea that ones own nation is better than all the rest - is nonsense. It all a matter of what metric one uses."

I argue that nationalism is merely love for ones country, according to the logic you presented, and it is NOT exceptionalism.

"And there's no question that exceptionalism - the idea that one's nation should be allowed to do things no other nation should be allowed to do - is obviously immoral (it breaks another universal social more; that of fairness)."

and this one I just think is funny because what you say reminds me of my country the USA, which I have been reminded on occasion is an "exceptional" nation. ha ha. and I agree with your perspective that "exceptionalism" is not right.

The other day I walked into a pub in Dublin, quite a popular one, and everyone inside was wearing a fez. Immediately a noticeable quiet descended upon the place, and many of the patrons turned to look at me.

This debate reminds me of that moment. I slowly backed out and went next door.

That was probably a bunch of masons you walked into while they were having a drink.

Possibly, but there was a distinct lack of people getting hammered.