Simcountry
Forum General The end of freedom of speech. (Golden Rainbow)

The end of freedom of speech. (Golden Rainbow)

Z
Zdeněk Pavlovský (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
28 Jan 2009 09:41Link
I'm not expert on Christianity nor Islam, however, I'm not all that sure Islam is less "evolved" than Christianity.

My opinion is that when it comes to conflicts between peoples and their causes, the role of religion is often being overrated, and vast majority of them stems from what we could call "social" reasons. Religion and in similar fashion also Nationalism or Racism for example act, in this sense, as catalyzer in chemical reaction - it speeds up a process, or makes it easier for people to subscribe to the "us versus them" world view.

Throughout our history people fought wars mainly for land, money and power, and I personally find it hard to believe anyone, except for very few whom we often call either terrorists, guerrillas, freedom fighters, radicals, fundamentalists or heroes depending on how we view "good" and "evil", is willing to die in offensive war for anything not tangible bu
N
nix001

All worlds
28 Jan 2009 15:41Link



Zdenek. Have you read the Bible? In there it talks about fighting against the unbelievers. And the Bible has been watered down. You should read the Koran or watch the many Islamic TV channels that are out there. You will then get the jist of the harshness of the teachings. There are alot of passages that call for the destruction of the non-believers and the punishment of women that commit adultary.

I think you are right about Religion being a product of social reasons. Man, when left up to his own devices, can either be good or bad. In the past without the threat of God or the forces created in the name of God the bad man was the ruler over the good man for the good man was alone and week. But with the forces of God/Good standing up to the bad man, the good man was able to curtail the bad mans wickedness. Creating a life that was built on Humaine instinct instead of Natural instinct.
Lose God and the bad man will take
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
28 Jan 2009 15:58Link
Well we agree on that....

I still enjoy your hairless monkey quote. Very deep.

The issue with Islam is not so much the Koran but with the hadith. The oral traditions of what Mohammed said or did. This is what Sharia law is based from. This is where the beating of your wife, sleeping with ten year old girls, ect.. comes from.
F
FarmerBob (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 02:10Link
You are pissing upwind here, Sam. What none of the children here seem to grasp is that Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion are founded upon the liberty to practice each without restriction.

Libel and slander are the only considerations, neither of which apply in this case.

Libel:
An untruthful statement about a person, published in writing or through broadcast media, that injures the person's reputation or standing in the community. Because libel is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. Libel is a form of defamation , as is slander (an untruthful statement that is spoken, but not published in writing or broadcast through the media).

Slander:
A false defamation (expressed in spoken words, signs, or gestures) which injures the character or reputation of the person defamed; distinguished from libel.
The
Z
Zdeněk Pavlovský (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 04:33Link
"In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to... draw a clear line," the court in Amsterdam said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7842344.stm
P
Pathetic Sheep (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 06:43Link
The crusades, the witch trials, the inquisition, and the invasion of the Americas were directly supported and administered by Christians and Christian institutions. Even the Holocaust was mostly organized by Christians. The word "terrorist" was created by Christians in order to describe a group of Christians.

I'm not Muslim or an expert on Islam. However, I am told that the term "jihad" is understood as an internal process. It is about as violent as maintaining a personal relationship with Jesus.

The idea of global political Islam and militant Jihad was spread by the CIA and ISI starting in the 1980s. The goal was to kill Russians in Afghanistan. Most of the pamphlets and textbooks used to educate the Mujahideen were printed on presses owned by Christians. The ideas of Political Islam have roots that go back to the mid 20th century. The suicidal missile toting mountain fanatics showed up in the 80's. The mi
F
FarmerBob

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 16:07Link
See what I mean, Sam?

Rome burns, whilst Caesar and the plebs fiddle.
D
Darke Katt (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 16:56Link
Let Rome burn. It lies to us as much as any other.
V
Váli (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 19:59Link
Pathetic sheep, what a perfect name to descirbe your last post.
Germans in general may have been christian, but Nazis? please...... they were into the occult etc hardly christain. The crusades etc all hundreds of years ago, please talk about live people please.
If you want to drag up history, the Arabs spread islam via jihad many years ago using external swords, spears, arrows etc...not much internal stuggle there.
The ottomans had a rather large empire aswell.
Enough of history, look at muslims today, 50 year old men marrying 8 year old girls in saudi arabia. This is backed by there courts. School girls being forced back into there burning school as they are not dressed properely for the street...again saudi...
The taleban killing those that would dare teach girls.
Iranians hanging gays. The torture of prisoners across the arab world.
blah blah blah I assume you get my drift.
Point being the western world has moved into the
Z
Zdeněk Pavlovský (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 21:01Link
Just to note, even if nobody probably cares, but ...

Personally I'm suspicious of those who's vocabulary (and thus state of mind?) lacks terms like:

In my opinion, I believe, Seems to me, I think, Probably or Its reasonable to assume .. etc etc

I'm also suspicious of those who set up informations so they appear to look as (scientific) facts, when in reality such informations are either opinions, misconceptions, prejudices, false or simply lies.

The way I see it, this thread has quite a few such posters and informations.
J
John R

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 22:33Link
Freedoms are privileges granted to the moment you disrespect them.
T
The Grand Poobah (Golden Rainbow)

All worlds
29 Jan 2009 22:59Link
"Point being the western world has moved into the 21st century. The muslim world has not. Well our version of the 21st century any way. They may like there own 21st century of religious b*&%$£$$
But I am sticking with the western version thanks.'

There's a reason the West is hated. We ain't angels sir.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
30 Jan 2009 01:56Link
We digress from the original point.

Why is calling Islam a facist religion worthy of investigation and possible jail time?

Agree or disagree the man has a right to his opinion. I am concerned at the lack of attention given this ongoing issue. If he were being investigated for insulting any other religion the outcry would be enormous. Which leads me to my second question.

What is the Leftist fascination with Islam.

Its the complete opposite of everything they believe in.
S
straight jacket II (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
30 Jan 2009 02:17Link
theres a young woman in Aust who could tell you about islam after being gang raped by them, reason being and these were their words "you deserve it because you are Australian".
F
FarmerBob

All worlds
30 Jan 2009 14:41Link
Associated Press June 23, 2009

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

In a landmark case yesterday, officials from the Dutch Ministry of Justice requested the extradition of a American citizen for comments reportedly made on an Internet game forum based in the Netherlands. The posts, made back in January, were allegedly of a highly inflammatory nature and directed at a specific religious group. An anonymous E-mail containing the remarks was sent to the Dutch authorities who promptly investigated the allegations.

"After a thorough investigation of the comments reported to us, we determined that this individual had violated our Hate Speech laws and was subject to prosecution in the Netherlands, since the criminal activity was conducted on Dutch property," said Andries Van Hangum, spokesman for the Ministry of Justice. "We, therefore, requested his arrest and extradition for trial in Dutch Courts."

Th

Z
Zdeněk Pavlovský (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
30 Jan 2009 15:02Link
Who needs nipples?
B
BorderC (Kebir Blue)

All worlds
30 Jan 2009 15:24Link
Well done Farmer Bob. Well done.
N
nix001

All worlds
31 Jan 2009 08:06Link
U dont F@~% with God.
I say, rolling in at this time loaded with Vodka. :) or :( as I'm not to sure how I should be feeling right now :) :( :) :(

Quote 'Associated Press June 23, 2009'???????????
Yes I know......2008 or 2007 or 2006 F it. I Don't know. But does it matter???????????? No. It just seemed like it did at the time. :)
N
nix001 (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
31 Jan 2009 09:09Link
Anyways. If man had not have dissolved Christianity, it would be us who would not be tolerating the lords name being taken in vain.
A
Asmodeus (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
02 Feb 2009 19:32Link
I fear we will never get rid, or outgrow god/Gods;
We have too much faith in grammar.
D
Darke Katt

All worlds
02 Feb 2009 21:36Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
--Benjamin Franklin<!-/Quote-!>



This would suggest that only true anarchism is desirable. By allowing governments to set laws we are surrendering many freedoms in the name of security. Would you surrender all law to anarchism?

This quote has never really been relevant to any time or place, no matter how inspiring it may appear to the cause of "Freedom of Speech."

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

253. THE FOX WHO SERVED A LION

A Lion had a Fox to attend on him, and whenever they went hunting the Fox found the prey and the Lion fell upon it and killed it, and then they divided it between them in certain proportions. But the Lion always got a very large share, and the Fox a very small one, which didn't please

T
The Grand Poobah (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
03 Feb 2009 00:22Link
wow, that second quote is the biggest bag of BS I've seen in a while. We must conform for our own safety.
It's more like we must conform for the people in charge's safety.

"It would be quite hillarious, were it not for all the innocent souls caught in the middle."

never truer. Maybe sumday they'll use paintball guns instead of real guns. I think a kid could recover from a rogue paintball.
F
FarmerBob (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
03 Feb 2009 03:08Link
Simplistic argument, DK. You can do much better than that.

Liberty guaranteed to citizens through rule of and protection of Law is hardly anarchy.

Old Ben's suggestion that throwing away freedoms in exchange for the promise of security was and is quite wise advice.
T
The Grand Poobah

All worlds
03 Feb 2009 04:47Link
and whatever happened to
"we have nothing to fear but fear itself"?

now it's
"Terrorists, destruction, terrorists, Evil Scourge, Death, Destruction, Terrorism, Evil Doers, Terrorists, terrorists and so many terrorists..Everywhere...your children will die..Terrorists"

/taken from speech by GW.
N
nix001 (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
03 Feb 2009 06:01Link
FB.
His suggestion was about giving up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.'

Liberty:
'a. The condition of being free from restriction or control.
b. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing.'

There are many liberties that people sacrifice every day to ensure their tolerance and acceptance of anothers rights and powers to act, believe, or express themselves in a manner of their own choosing.
Liberties are also sacrificed in order to understand better, which in turn brings security.


I think the more secure one feels in the world around one, the less one needs to distinguish and reaffirm ones belief from anothers belief. Creating a lesser need for ones own understanding of ones own liberty and a greater need for ones understanding of others liberty.

And visa versa. The less secure you feel