All worlds
My opinion is that when it comes to conflicts between peoples and their causes, the role of religion is often being overrated, and vast majority of them stems from what we could call "social" reasons. Religion and in similar fashion also Nationalism or Racism for example act, in this sense, as catalyzer in chemical reaction - it speeds up a process, or makes it easier for people to subscribe to the "us versus them" world view.
Throughout our history people fought wars mainly for land, money and power, and I personally find it hard to believe anyone, except for very few whom we often call either terrorists, guerrillas, freedom fighters, radicals, fundamentalists or heroes depending on how we view "good" and "evil", is willing to die in offensive war for anything not tangible bu
All worlds
Zdenek. Have you read the Bible? In there it talks about fighting against the unbelievers. And the Bible has been watered down. You should read the Koran or watch the many Islamic TV channels that are out there. You will then get the jist of the harshness of the teachings. There are alot of passages that call for the destruction of the non-believers and the punishment of women that commit adultary.
I think you are right about Religion being a product of social reasons. Man, when left up to his own devices, can either be good or bad. In the past without the threat of God or the forces created in the name of God the bad man was the ruler over the good man for the good man was alone and week. But with the forces of God/Good standing up to the bad man, the good man was able to curtail the bad mans wickedness. Creating a life that was built on Humaine instinct instead of Natural instinct.
Lose God and the bad man will take
All worlds
I still enjoy your hairless monkey quote. Very deep.
The issue with Islam is not so much the Koran but with the hadith. The oral traditions of what Mohammed said or did. This is what Sharia law is based from. This is where the beating of your wife, sleeping with ten year old girls, ect.. comes from.
All worlds
Libel and slander are the only considerations, neither of which apply in this case.
Libel:
An untruthful statement about a person, published in writing or through broadcast media, that injures the person's reputation or standing in the community. Because libel is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. Libel is a form of defamation , as is slander (an untruthful statement that is spoken, but not published in writing or broadcast through the media).
Slander:
A false defamation (expressed in spoken words, signs, or gestures) which injures the character or reputation of the person defamed; distinguished from libel.
The
All worlds
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7842344.stm
All worlds
I'm not Muslim or an expert on Islam. However, I am told that the term "jihad" is understood as an internal process. It is about as violent as maintaining a personal relationship with Jesus.
The idea of global political Islam and militant Jihad was spread by the CIA and ISI starting in the 1980s. The goal was to kill Russians in Afghanistan. Most of the pamphlets and textbooks used to educate the Mujahideen were printed on presses owned by Christians. The ideas of Political Islam have roots that go back to the mid 20th century. The suicidal missile toting mountain fanatics showed up in the 80's. The mi
All worlds
Rome burns, whilst Caesar and the plebs fiddle.
All worlds
All worlds
Germans in general may have been christian, but Nazis? please...... they were into the occult etc hardly christain. The crusades etc all hundreds of years ago, please talk about live people please.
If you want to drag up history, the Arabs spread islam via jihad many years ago using external swords, spears, arrows etc...not much internal stuggle there.
The ottomans had a rather large empire aswell.
Enough of history, look at muslims today, 50 year old men marrying 8 year old girls in saudi arabia. This is backed by there courts. School girls being forced back into there burning school as they are not dressed properely for the street...again saudi...
The taleban killing those that would dare teach girls.
Iranians hanging gays. The torture of prisoners across the arab world.
blah blah blah I assume you get my drift.
Point being the western world has moved into the
All worlds
Personally I'm suspicious of those who's vocabulary (and thus state of mind?) lacks terms like:
In my opinion, I believe, Seems to me, I think, Probably or Its reasonable to assume .. etc etc
I'm also suspicious of those who set up informations so they appear to look as (scientific) facts, when in reality such informations are either opinions, misconceptions, prejudices, false or simply lies.
The way I see it, this thread has quite a few such posters and informations.
All worlds
All worlds
But I am sticking with the western version thanks.'
There's a reason the West is hated. We ain't angels sir.
All worlds
Why is calling Islam a facist religion worthy of investigation and possible jail time?
Agree or disagree the man has a right to his opinion. I am concerned at the lack of attention given this ongoing issue. If he were being investigated for insulting any other religion the outcry would be enormous. Which leads me to my second question.
What is the Leftist fascination with Islam.
Its the complete opposite of everything they believe in.
All worlds
All worlds
<!-Quote-!>Quote:In a landmark case yesterday, officials from the Dutch Ministry of Justice requested the extradition of a American citizen for comments reportedly made on an Internet game forum based in the Netherlands. The posts, made back in January, were allegedly of a highly inflammatory nature and directed at a specific religious group. An anonymous E-mail containing the remarks was sent to the Dutch authorities who promptly investigated the allegations.
"After a thorough investigation of the comments reported to us, we determined that this individual had violated our Hate Speech laws and was subject to prosecution in the Netherlands, since the criminal activity was conducted on Dutch property," said Andries Van Hangum, spokesman for the Ministry of Justice. "We, therefore, requested his arrest and extradition for trial in Dutch Courts."
Th
All worlds
All worlds
All worlds
I say, rolling in at this time loaded with Vodka.
or
as I'm not to sure how I should be feeling right now
Quote 'Associated Press June 23, 2009'???????????
Yes I know......2008 or 2007 or 2006 F it. I Don't know. But does it matter???????????? No. It just seemed like it did at the time.

All worlds
All worlds
We have too much faith in grammar.
All worlds
<!-Quote-!>Quote:Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
--Benjamin Franklin<!-/Quote-!>
This would suggest that only true anarchism is desirable. By allowing governments to set laws we are surrendering many freedoms in the name of security. Would you surrender all law to anarchism?
This quote has never really been relevant to any time or place, no matter how inspiring it may appear to the cause of "Freedom of Speech."
<!-Quote-!>Quote:253. THE FOX WHO SERVED A LION
A Lion had a Fox to attend on him, and whenever they went hunting the Fox found the prey and the Lion fell upon it and killed it, and then they divided it between them in certain proportions. But the Lion always got a very large share, and the Fox a very small one, which didn't please
All worlds
It's more like we must conform for the people in charge's safety.
"It would be quite hillarious, were it not for all the innocent souls caught in the middle."
never truer. Maybe sumday they'll use paintball guns instead of real guns. I think a kid could recover from a rogue paintball.
All worlds
Liberty guaranteed to citizens through rule of and protection of Law is hardly anarchy.
Old Ben's suggestion that throwing away freedoms in exchange for the promise of security was and is quite wise advice.
All worlds
"we have nothing to fear but fear itself"?
now it's
"Terrorists, destruction, terrorists, Evil Scourge, Death, Destruction, Terrorism, Evil Doers, Terrorists, terrorists and so many terrorists..Everywhere...your children will die..Terrorists"
/taken from speech by GW.
All worlds
His suggestion was about giving up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.'
Liberty:
'a. The condition of being free from restriction or control.
b. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing.'
There are many liberties that people sacrifice every day to ensure their tolerance and acceptance of anothers rights and powers to act, believe, or express themselves in a manner of their own choosing.
Liberties are also sacrificed in order to understand better, which in turn brings security.
I think the more secure one feels in the world around one, the less one needs to distinguish and reaffirm ones belief from anothers belief. Creating a lesser need for ones own understanding of ones own liberty and a greater need for ones understanding of others liberty.
And visa versa. The less secure you feel