This post was simply to point out your hypocrisy. This hypocrisy spreads in many ways.
As you know I came to you and asked a few other people to see if it's alright, too gain acceptance you know to fight someone who has been around longer than I. If you wanted to protect him all you had to say is this would happen if I pursued. You know this to be true, I even referenced this thread to bring to you before I even decided his countries weren't worth taking and I was just gonna drop a bomb on him. So it begs the question how can someone like this be Sec. of State for a World government that is supposed to encourage safety and player interaction? There is so many things wrong with that last statement.
1. If I never interacted with Wendy I'd not be in war. To hold a position that is essentially the ultimate ambassador and has this big of leap against a mission statement of sorts is so contradicting. Definitely point 1 there.
2. To refuse two players that have been playing for under a year the ability to settle a dispute without the interference of a player who has been playing for what 5? This is a tolitarian approach to world governance and as the arguments go, war was been declared on other worlds for the exact 'crimes' that you are committing against myself. You can justify interference when you are the attacker or the defender, pfft... You are an empty shell, you only believe in something if it works towards your advantage.
3. Now I know this is not an LU matter so your position on another planet has 0 relevance on GR, but it has tons of relevance on LU. It just shows your character. I gained approval to perform this action from you, you approved it too make an excuse to hit me? That layer of deceit shows the world who you are. And anyone who is anyone knows that deception is weak. I never deceive, because I know I won't feel any pride unless I've earned it through skill or intelligence. If you had the administration password you would use it to win what you wanted, you would be a cheat code user if available. Where is your pride? Deception? Bah, it isn't deception it is lack of character or integrity.
4. Given the third point, this one really is unnecessary, but oh well. Why bother manufacturing an excuse for your actions when you don't one, because any decision you make will be self-servicing anyhow? It's like why should someone ask an alcoholic why they drink? Because they want to and it is no business of yours anyways. So stop with the petty excuses, you do what you do because you want to do it. If you make an attempt to justify your actions you just look silly, because you are too full of contradictions.