To start, my issues are with AF leadership and not UC. That should be clear. I have found respect for the players of UC and they are always fair in their dealings with me. I have learned that not all in AF were open and fair when it came to internal matters, however. My displeasure lies there.
I think that both feds have a smattering of "talkers/stokers" and "quiet diplomatic" types.
Were the diplomatic types plotting to kill the talkers, in the "UC," whose words and actions were perhaps perpetuating the war and costing assets? Somehow I doubt it.
Ive been playing long enough to know there are appropriate ways to usurp power within a fed. There are appropriate ways to make a statement that "I have had enough of this war." Plotting to kill the chair, during war, because he cursed or was perhaps angry and verbose about the environment at that time, cant possibly be right.
Some playe
D
DavePat (Fearless Blue)
All worlds
Barney has it right as usual.
J
John Fire (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
<!-Quote-!>Quote:To start, my issues are with AF leadership and not UC. That should be clear.<!-/Quote-!>
<!-Quote-!>Quote:Topic Title:
The UC continuing its bullying (as if it matters) (Golden Rainbow)<!-/Quote-!>
Please find a new topic. The source of confusion is in the title. The original post is Defcon complaining that I declared war on him, and that I subsequently took his country which to my knowledge doesn't involve Bayar or John L. As you can see, there is a good reason for UC members to be concerned with talks of war in a thread titled such as this.
B
Barney Rubble
All worlds
have laguna close the thread then. probably for the best at this point anyway.
D
Dubhthaigh (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
I AM THE LAW. I am Judge Dredd!