Country Profit Per Capita (Little Upsilon)

Publish your CPPC and see how you compare.

Take your current predicted full year profit or loss and diviide it by your population.

Green Paws Empire = 25,646

Horde of Nations = 50,197

I haven't begun economic repair of my LU empire. When I do, I'll be sure to give you financiers a run for your per capita income.

I look forward to that day Wendy!

Zen, looking at your country, you used total year income and not profit.

Wendy, I'll be glad to see competing with us.

-eiπ

It's magical!

-e^(i*pi)?

Yes. That's supposed to be a big, round pie.

A1 = $31,044

Lord Lee

The Republic of Brutillius: $44,364

the empire of rostera = $91,209 someone double check please but that should be right or very close math is not my best subject, of course the state provides free cafiene to every household but...

I see that now. 27,940 is mine.

Cheetah: Yours is accurate. I got 91,325 for you but that is close enough and it will vary from month to month somewhat.

Are you people sure you are doing this right?

216 153,63M is the same as multiplying that by 1 000 000 and dropping the M: 216 153 630 000. Divide this by 53 717 376 and we get 4 023,9.

So, either you people are making trillions a game month, or yer doin it wraung!

To all other smarty-pants around here, yes, a comma separates the units from the decimals and a space the thousands in my grammatical norm.

Laguna:

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

...full year profit or loss...<!-/Quote-!>

...so, yours is probably somewhere near $49,000, or 49 000,00 ;)

Also, for those with very new countries, and still getting "Beginner Income Boosts", obviously, this "per capita profit" is really not accurate, in the sense that the profits are coming in large part from an "outside" source. Countries who are receiving that "income" should delete it from the profit total to get a more comparative and "sustainable" measure, and that's probably why one country had something close to double that of Laguna's country, haha, which probably caused "LG" to go into "shock and terror" and mis-read the formula temporarily.

And, for the record, Laguna's value would be a good "benchmark" to use to compare these values...if you are approaching his levels, or exceeding them you are likely doing excellent, and if you are far below, say 50% or less, then that probably shows that your country has a lot more potential profits that it could be making...though the potential increase would increase with increasing population, as it's generally understood that larger countries can make more profits than smaller ones.

Dammit!

And as if it wasn't enough, I can't do the -eiπ bit!

You know, Laguna...you could add some "spice" to this topic, and introduce a "factor" that would compensate for comparing different sized countries (given that, for example, 9M sized countries can't produce the same profit per person as a 60M sized country) ;)

I suppose using employed workers would be a better indicator than total population.

As a nation matures, (1) the active portion tends to diminish. Not only that, but (2) a greater fraction tends to be used in non-profitable sectors like Health, Education and the Army.

Taking only workers into account resolves issue (1); by subtracting workers employed in the non-profitable sectors, it would solve (2).

For simplicity, I recommend using just employed workers.

Which of these values would that be then?

Population	102,917,273	Total Population
Employment Index	87.96	Employment Index
Percentage Unemployed	12.04	Unemployment Index
Number of Employed	46,086,671	Number of working people
Number of Unemployed	5,710,274	Number of Jobless People

Are you saying the total possible workers (Number of Employed + Number of Unemployed), or just current workers (Number of Employed)?

For this country, those two would be about 50% and 45% of total population, respectively. That appears low, as you were saying.

Number of Employed, since Green Paws seems to be more interested in efficiency.

Okay then Restart the list.... my number is a (negative) -xxxxxx because I'm not making a profit, but It might be actually pretty reasonable because my percentage employed is a whopping....

Number of Employed 623,596 Number of working people

Population 38,922,951 Total Population
Employment Index 5.60 Employment Index

I think Laguna's measurement would be interesting as the Country Profit Per Capital varies wildly and it would only matter if we could the data on all of the largest countries.

It's a shame the number employed in corporations is not included in the downloads.

For the most populous mains (as CP has 3 about the same level), the % of those employed in corporations out of the total population ( as slight change on that discussed above):

Rank	Country Name	Population	Total Employed	Corp Emp	Corp %
1	Jungleland	104,213,746	52,369,122	40,343,254	38.712%
2	Pekardi	101,736,263	52,605,405	36,444,549	35.823%
3	Melichor	99,944,038	47,209,336	35,724,094	35.744%
4	Horde of Nations	111,178,587	49,917,422	39,288,272	35.338%
5	A1	129,214,288	60,178,224	43,531,431	33.689%
6	Raven Rock	168,135,412	73,135,833	55,672,089	33.111%
7	Green Paws Empire	196,276,385	86,169,002	62,654,147	31.921%
8	CG 3000	93,076,622	41,664,090	28,404,834	30.518%
9	The Crown Kingdom of Quinton	93,677,694	39,061,852	28,564,157	30.492%
10	Operation Blackout	102,651,825	34,561,079	22,952,739	22.360%

ALL THESE DISGUSTINGLY HIGH POPULATIONS i THINK MY CAPS LOCK IS ABOUT TO BURST!!!