A
Aries
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 00:20Link
"The part of the investment fund that is being restructured is the cash part, largely originating from contributions by the population, less the amounts paid to workers and the major contributions, coming from interest."
or
1. "The part of the investment fund that is being restructured is the cash part....coming from interest"
If you mean to say the dividends now have a negative effect on the cash level of the fund, this is correct.
2. " largely originating from contributions by the population"
This is not true for those that work on their funds. Dividends account for 2 or 3 times the amount added to the cash level of the funds compared to worker contributions for most of my funds.
3. "Interest should be set to zero or lower as it does not come from any investment made by the fund but it is paid by the gamemaster. "
Interest should be paid by the magical World Ba
or
1. "The part of the investment fund that is being restructured is the cash part....coming from interest"
If you mean to say the dividends now have a negative effect on the cash level of the fund, this is correct.
2. " largely originating from contributions by the population"
This is not true for those that work on their funds. Dividends account for 2 or 3 times the amount added to the cash level of the funds compared to worker contributions for most of my funds.
3. "Interest should be set to zero or lower as it does not come from any investment made by the fund but it is paid by the gamemaster. "
Interest should be paid by the magical World Ba
O
Orbiter
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 13:46Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:We will zero the interest paid by the gamemaster.
we will discuss the possibility of a negative interest rate or leave it at zero.
-Andy<!-/Quote-!>
i get the hint, i'll stop talking before you take away my birthday
A
Andy
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 16:20Link
The statements above are largely incorrect.
There are some changes expected in these funds:
1. The world bank is not interested in the money. It takes loans when it needs them but the funds money is not part of it. There is no reason to pay any interest on this money and inject useless (or any other) money into the game and distort the cash flow.
2. The contribution of the population are too high. More should be spent on products, and less given to the funds. They are swamped in huge unused amounts. This is money that is taken out of the world cash into the funds.
3. The contributions of the funds to the people who have paid their money in the past, are far too small. These amounts will increase.
4. Funds will receive less from the populations, and pay back more. They have income from dividend and can increase their income, by making sure their money is invested in shares.
Money sitting in the
There are some changes expected in these funds:
1. The world bank is not interested in the money. It takes loans when it needs them but the funds money is not part of it. There is no reason to pay any interest on this money and inject useless (or any other) money into the game and distort the cash flow.
2. The contribution of the population are too high. More should be spent on products, and less given to the funds. They are swamped in huge unused amounts. This is money that is taken out of the world cash into the funds.
3. The contributions of the funds to the people who have paid their money in the past, are far too small. These amounts will increase.
4. Funds will receive less from the populations, and pay back more. They have income from dividend and can increase their income, by making sure their money is invested in shares.
Money sitting in the
C
claude balls
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 22:02Link
Andy, you have taken money from our investment fund cash fund. I do not agree with you that most of this cash was generated when "cash was worthless', I worked hard to generate this money.
I understand your rational for doing this, however some warning would have been polite to your customers before you start taking cash from their investment fund.
I understand your rational for doing this, however some warning would have been polite to your customers before you start taking cash from their investment fund.
H
hymy
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 22:41Link
I still don't understand what benefit you got from that fund. It was basically a monetary black hole, that ate cash and never gave it back. Everything Andy has said about it tracks with what I was aware of, so it didn't change while I was gone. Also, very little of what you guys have said makes any sense.
Either you guys didn't understand what you were doing, which I don't beleive, or you had some other nefarious thing going on that you don't want to talk about. I mean I can beleive that one of you got all bored one day and started playing the stock market. But there is no way all of you were, unless you were getting something out of it. Quite few things that have been said even directly imply you were benefitting somehow.
Your not going to have any sympathy as long as your evasive about it. This was a simple improvement to the game, you had to know whatever you were doing would be subject to game improvements. But y
Either you guys didn't understand what you were doing, which I don't beleive, or you had some other nefarious thing going on that you don't want to talk about. I mean I can beleive that one of you got all bored one day and started playing the stock market. But there is no way all of you were, unless you were getting something out of it. Quite few things that have been said even directly imply you were benefitting somehow.
Your not going to have any sympathy as long as your evasive about it. This was a simple improvement to the game, you had to know whatever you were doing would be subject to game improvements. But y
O
Orbiter
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 23:19Link
interesting isn't it, hymy? that made me chuckle, in one breath Andy said the IFs where useless, then in the next explained why large IFs are valuable, and you missed it
anyways, in reference to my ever decreasing IF, whats the target goal cash level for these funds, andy? that is, how low do that have to go, before they stop decreasing?
anyways, in reference to my ever decreasing IF, whats the target goal cash level for these funds, andy? that is, how low do that have to go, before they stop decreasing?
O
Orbiter
All worlds
25 Sep 2014 23:59Link
also andy, i see where your going with this, i think
it sounds like the pay out to the pop, will be based on dividends, instead of that increasing the fund. the fund will increase based on pop contributions. un-invested money, will have a zero, or a negative effect.
if i've got this right(?) this is a positive change
i'm still disappointed from my lump of cash just being deleted, but your change sounds very good, i can already think how this will be much more beneficial, various settings i can change to manipulate this to a greater advantage than my 90T coulda done
it sounds like the pay out to the pop, will be based on dividends, instead of that increasing the fund. the fund will increase based on pop contributions. un-invested money, will have a zero, or a negative effect.
if i've got this right(?) this is a positive change
i'm still disappointed from my lump of cash just being deleted, but your change sounds very good, i can already think how this will be much more beneficial, various settings i can change to manipulate this to a greater advantage than my 90T coulda done
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 04:23Link
@hymy
It is possible to extract money from the investment fund by buying shares from your CEO company. Meanwhile the cash was earning some interest. Long term investment and a store of wealth.
but anyway...
It is possible to extract money from the investment fund by buying shares from your CEO company. Meanwhile the cash was earning some interest. Long term investment and a store of wealth.
but anyway...
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 04:28Link
My gripe is that we were not given sufficient warning or time to allocate our cash before it started to be stripped from us. And no mention of compensation.
A
Andy
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 10:49Link
The fund was set up to make sure some money goes into the share market. Investment funds trade automatically according to some rules and make sure we have an active share market.
without the funds, the share market would not work as the number of manual transactions is too small.
The error in the procedure is that money came in, for a long time, and ended up sitting there as unused cash.
Money going out was a tiny fraction of the income.
Except for this, funds are a marginal function and for now will remain so although we will try to move them from irrelevance, to something with more common sense.
To discard false claims, it should be clear that nobody earned any substantial amounts of money in the fund. It varies from zero in most cases, to a small percentage in other cases.
Certainly the president did little to get money into the fund.
If anyone, these are workers who put some of their salaries in the
without the funds, the share market would not work as the number of manual transactions is too small.
The error in the procedure is that money came in, for a long time, and ended up sitting there as unused cash.
Money going out was a tiny fraction of the income.
Except for this, funds are a marginal function and for now will remain so although we will try to move them from irrelevance, to something with more common sense.
To discard false claims, it should be clear that nobody earned any substantial amounts of money in the fund. It varies from zero in most cases, to a small percentage in other cases.
Certainly the president did little to get money into the fund.
If anyone, these are workers who put some of their salaries in the
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 13:41Link
'Certainly the president did little to get money into the fund. '
wrong
wrong
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 13:43Link
'it should be clear that nobody earned any substantial amounts of money in the fund. It varies from zero in most cases, to a small percentage in other cases. '
is not consistent with
'Most of the money came from the gamemaster. '
is not consistent with
'Most of the money came from the gamemaster. '
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 13:44Link
'The cash is not going away and there is no need to warn you months in advance.'
wrong
look at my investment funds, losing cash monthly.
wrong
look at my investment funds, losing cash monthly.
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 13:48Link
Andy
Can you answer my previous question many post ago,
why is the money in my investment fund disappearing?
Can you answer my previous question many post ago,
why is the money in my investment fund disappearing?
H
hymy
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 19:14Link
Thannks claude, for being clear about that.
A
Andy
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 21:23Link
The funds might loose much more money as we move on.
They will have to pay their investors serious money.
Funds that will not invest, will make losses.
Start putting the money to work ASAP.
They will have to pay their investors serious money.
Funds that will not invest, will make losses.
Start putting the money to work ASAP.
C
claude balls
All worlds
26 Sep 2014 22:39Link
Andy, It is very disappointing to see you treating us this way.
While I understand your intentions, for me it is a matter of principle. Your actions show me little respect for the time and money I have invested in the game. Don't expect my support any longer.
While I understand your intentions, for me it is a matter of principle. Your actions show me little respect for the time and money I have invested in the game. Don't expect my support any longer.
A
Andy
All worlds
27 Sep 2014 11:45Link
No problem.
We will make the investment fund an active part of the game.
I fail to see where a president has any value attached to the fund.
you can do nothing at all with the money in the fund. It was never yours and unusable for the president. It has always been this way.
Now, after this change, much more money will flow from the fund to the citizens of the country.
This must sound like a real disaster and misuse of "well earned funds".
If you want to sit on the unusable money gained from GM "interest" and gain more unusable money without doing anything, this is the wrong game for you.
Reread my explanation.
I fail to see how anyone could think that this is a bad feature for the game.
Not a very important one but in any case, not damaging anyone.
We will make the investment fund an active part of the game.
I fail to see where a president has any value attached to the fund.
you can do nothing at all with the money in the fund. It was never yours and unusable for the president. It has always been this way.
Now, after this change, much more money will flow from the fund to the citizens of the country.
This must sound like a real disaster and misuse of "well earned funds".
If you want to sit on the unusable money gained from GM "interest" and gain more unusable money without doing anything, this is the wrong game for you.
Reread my explanation.
I fail to see how anyone could think that this is a bad feature for the game.
Not a very important one but in any case, not damaging anyone.
C
claude balls
All worlds
27 Sep 2014 12:22Link
I am not arguing that the reforms aren't good Andy. It is about time.
It is your failure to understand that taking money from an account that I worked to build without any warning is quite offensive.
At first I thought it was a game error. Such time has passed that large quantities of cash have been taken from my accounts. Now you tell us to use it or lose it. I am a little busy at the moment and don't really have the time to deal with you forcing my hand.
Your failure to 'see where a president has any value attached to the fund' is the problem here. You are taking money from me that I worked hard to generate. What is so hard to understand about that?
I can access investment fund cash by IPO'ing my CEO owned companies, selling 80% of them to my investment funds and in doing so raising the individual corp to a Q250 productivity and efficiency and extracting money from the investment fund to my CEO acc
It is your failure to understand that taking money from an account that I worked to build without any warning is quite offensive.
At first I thought it was a game error. Such time has passed that large quantities of cash have been taken from my accounts. Now you tell us to use it or lose it. I am a little busy at the moment and don't really have the time to deal with you forcing my hand.
Your failure to 'see where a president has any value attached to the fund' is the problem here. You are taking money from me that I worked hard to generate. What is so hard to understand about that?
I can access investment fund cash by IPO'ing my CEO owned companies, selling 80% of them to my investment funds and in doing so raising the individual corp to a Q250 productivity and efficiency and extracting money from the investment fund to my CEO acc
O
Orbiter
All worlds
27 Sep 2014 15:48Link
when you say it was never our funds, thats kinda a loose way to justify taking them,
i can adjust my tax rates, to increase the profit pay outs into my IFs, rather than into my countries general fund, its a diversion of money that i choose to make, it is my money, money i choose to put into the IFs, rather than into my direct trading
i can adjust my tax rates, to increase the profit pay outs into my IFs, rather than into my countries general fund, its a diversion of money that i choose to make, it is my money, money i choose to put into the IFs, rather than into my direct trading
A
Aries
All worlds
27 Sep 2014 16:49Link
I agree with the last few posts here. I run 0% tax in 6 of my 9 countries on LU to pay additional dividends to my funds. This unannounced change that was not addressed on this thread for two weeks changes my game-play.
I still don't know exactly where my funds cash is going. Is this going to citizens? It does not appear so.
I still don't know exactly where my funds cash is going. Is this going to citizens? It does not appear so.
A
Andy
All worlds
28 Sep 2014 17:45Link
Orbiter,
you cannot influence the payments into the fund. They are part of the income of workers, depending on which group it is.
We are not taking any of your money away, the money away, the money from the fund, is paid to the workers.
it will become visible in the coming days, on the page describing the fund.
you cannot influence the payments into the fund. They are part of the income of workers, depending on which group it is.
We are not taking any of your money away, the money away, the money from the fund, is paid to the workers.
it will become visible in the coming days, on the page describing the fund.
A
Andy
All worlds
28 Sep 2014 17:46Link
Great to have some animated discussion on the forum.
The GMs love it.
This one is about nothing, but who cares?
The GMs love it.
This one is about nothing, but who cares?
C
claude balls
All worlds
28 Sep 2014 23:44Link
Andy,
lol, By raising wages you can increase payments into the fund,
Unless you have recently changed this.
How can 200B per game month be paid to workers?
Yes, Andy 200B per game month from each fund.
Can you read this?
Can you look at my game account and check?
It would have to be a very well invested funded to withstand that kind of payout.
lol, By raising wages you can increase payments into the fund,
Unless you have recently changed this.
How can 200B per game month be paid to workers?
Yes, Andy 200B per game month from each fund.
Can you read this?
Can you look at my game account and check?
It would have to be a very well invested funded to withstand that kind of payout.
A
Andy
All worlds
29 Sep 2014 00:07Link
Ah,
Now you are showing some numbers and reason.
200B is unreasonable.
raising salaries?
the last reason for that is income for the fund.
and the influence of the salaries is small. Other results of higher salaries are much more significant. to really increase input to the fund, you need to increase salaries to unreasonable levels. your corporations will die.
and for what? as I said, the money is not yours. you cannot mix it with the country funds.
when the change is made this week, the numbers will make sense.
We will have to set it to some initial percentage and then look at results in many countries and tune it in the first days it runs.
by the end of the coming week, I hope to have it all done.
Now you are showing some numbers and reason.
200B is unreasonable.
raising salaries?
the last reason for that is income for the fund.
and the influence of the salaries is small. Other results of higher salaries are much more significant. to really increase input to the fund, you need to increase salaries to unreasonable levels. your corporations will die.
and for what? as I said, the money is not yours. you cannot mix it with the country funds.
when the change is made this week, the numbers will make sense.
We will have to set it to some initial percentage and then look at results in many countries and tune it in the first days it runs.
by the end of the coming week, I hope to have it all done.