I suppose that when he leaves a particular country, it reverts to C3 status and begins rebuilding, but there would be a lag time until these new corps were up and running and healthily upgraded. Yeah, that would bite, to expend trillions in a war and end up with a gutted shell. The purpose it serves is simply that this person has to get his jollies by effing things up for others; he probably is too dense to learn the game, or is trying to compensate for anatomical "shortcomings". Normally, we could nuke an obstreporous player into submission, but that apparently wouldn't work here, as this player is obviously a "free" player with no vested interest in the game, only interested in repeatedly showing his incompetence and moving on to the next example. The only way to stop this behavior would be to put a waiting period between the closing of your last country and the acquisition of a new one; however, this would also penalize normal peopl
M
maclean (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
On the other hand, this player could be a CIA double agent working for the KGB (you didn't think they really went away, did you?) and/or taking orders from the Tri-Lateralists,who are working with the Illuminati and the Biderbergers to fund his clandestine convention at Bohemian Grove. This makes sense if you realze that MK-Ultra could be using this game as a trial run for their mind-control experiments, which the Freemasons originally screwed up with the help of the Knights Templars and Castro.
B
Bangster (White Giant)
All worlds
I like the 2nd explanation better, makes more sense.
C
Captain Dog (White Giant)
All worlds
I'm not trying to eff things up for anyone, nor am I a free player. I am simply experimenting here... I have taken 2 countries and I am attempting to strip them. I can't really find much information on the subject, so I am having to use a trial and error approach.
My understanding from the game docs is that all cash and debt from the canceled country will come to my main, but it appears that I simply get a fixed payout (2T from the first one I took).
Bangster, there is nothing sinister going on here.
B
Bangster (White Giant)
All worlds
I guess that accounts for 2 of them, but there's 10 more just in our region.
M
MAGNUM (White Giant)
All worlds
i understand that if you attack a c3 and destroy its corps the money the corp had goes to the country and when you conquer it you can then take the money. is this correct?
M
maclean (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
@ captain dog: I want to make it clear that I am not talking about you, then, in my previous post. There is a big difference between a paying player experimenting and a free player simply looting all the countries in someone's perimiter just for shitz and giggles.
C
Captain Dog (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
R
Rick Johnston (White Giant)
All worlds
why people hate on free players man we are just as smart as any of you fancy pants just cause we dont pay money doesnt mean we are dumb
K
Keto (Fearless Blue)
All worlds
M
maclean (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
Ok, let me explain a little further: I don't hate free players; hell, I was one myself not long ago. I welcome more players, both free and paying. It can only help, not hinder, the economy. What I have a problem with is people with no vested interest in the game deliberately and with malice aforethought, causing trouble for other players (free or paying) with no purpose other than causing said trouble for said players, and sabotaging the game.
R
Rick Johnston (White Giant)
All worlds
well theres no way to stop it so everyone just has to deal with it