N
neutralsc
02 Nov 2021 17:00
Link
Hi all,
Most 2T aid proposals get through but a quick look seems to indicate that its often with just a 3:2 majority. I too do sometimes vote against proposals.
For example when financials shows negative cash of more than 2T, a deficit of 20B monthly, a defense expense of 30B monthly, while being below WL3, what is the purpose of giving them a onetime cash injection of 2T? Not only is it just pointless, but it is actually also a missed opportunity, because if tweaking the financials would lead to a monthly surplus, they would be able to actually use the aid instead letting it get burned with the unresolved deficits. Requirements should be attached to giving cash aid. This is what the IMF does to in real life too and for good reasons. And the community as a whole would grow as well because players with better financials would be better competitors / more activity which would benefit the sustainability of the game as a whole. It would be a win-win.
Unfortunately I lack the required brain thrust to come up with a concrete detailed plan, so my question to you all is, how can we implement such a policy in an effective way.
Or do you disagree or even better ideas? What are they and why? Thanks for reading.
Most 2T aid proposals get through but a quick look seems to indicate that its often with just a 3:2 majority. I too do sometimes vote against proposals.
For example when financials shows negative cash of more than 2T, a deficit of 20B monthly, a defense expense of 30B monthly, while being below WL3, what is the purpose of giving them a onetime cash injection of 2T? Not only is it just pointless, but it is actually also a missed opportunity, because if tweaking the financials would lead to a monthly surplus, they would be able to actually use the aid instead letting it get burned with the unresolved deficits. Requirements should be attached to giving cash aid. This is what the IMF does to in real life too and for good reasons. And the community as a whole would grow as well because players with better financials would be better competitors / more activity which would benefit the sustainability of the game as a whole. It would be a win-win.
Unfortunately I lack the required brain thrust to come up with a concrete detailed plan, so my question to you all is, how can we implement such a policy in an effective way.
Or do you disagree or even better ideas? What are they and why? Thanks for reading.