Simcountry
Forum White Giant World War 2 on WG (White Giant)

World War 2 on WG (White Giant)

O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 02:55Link
well chryso, you can revisit the above "loser leaves WG," or you can just drop it. thats all i am offering.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 03:05Link
EC lol. If only your honor was equal to your humor.

Excuse my French, but you attacked with all you had the balls to attack with, and I'm cutting them off. Don't blame me if they are small. That is what you had the guts to take out of war protection and fight with.

For all the times you guys keep saying a win is not a win because you didn't risk real countries, my advise is to risk them.

The Boycott is a show of support of the WG community for you to take your countries out of war protection and fight like a man; or to seek peace. It is a condemnation of your attacking with C3s. It is not just me; 20 other people and counting have voted for you to fight like a man or stop fighting. Same for the rest of you 4 bullies.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 03:59Link
Fact: EC's army size before the war: 47 million.

Fact: EC's army size now: 33 Million.

Even with all the new military he has bought, he has is down 14 million soldiers and officers. To put that in perspective, I started the war with 16 million soldiers and officers.

I have taken essentially (in addition to what he has rebuilt) as many troops as where in my entire army AND THIS IS JUST WHAT I TOOK FROM EC.

So, 4 people attack me. Their armies were several times the size of mine (about 10 times as large when combined), and I've killed -- from EC alone almost as many troops as were in my army when war started.

They had in their C3s more troops, than I did in my empire.

Bottom line is that with a 10 to 1 advantage, they failed their dishonorable unprovoked attack. They now hide in war protection.

My allies and I have taken 6 of their countries, including 5 in a
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 04:09Link
very well chryso, well keep on shooting.
H
HORDO

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 04:31Link
wow, hordo, i wish i had the time to show you why people are complaining about c3 warfare... after all that

Orbiter, I hope you didn't mean you want to attack me. Even if you do so what. I will not be intimidated to bend the truth or lower my standards in my real life the everyday people would break a man's jaw and face for talking to a woman like keto and his fed talk to wendy. It is disgusting, I'll go to war if need be for pointing out that it is disgusting you aren't saying anything to me I will continue pointing out that these little boys need to act like men it is a game I don't care if you have time or not to show me what c3 war is all about. nothing you say or do will change my mind or hush me. Grow up little boys, try being a man and make you mothers proud.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 04:33Link
Most of the remaining countries, I've agreed to let other people attack...

My only job is painting them.
W
whiteboy (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 05:05Link
Hordo - She's not a woman, she's a b*tch and has gotten far less than she deserves. In addition, she could be a dude...probably is, I'll choose to treat everyone in this game equally because who knows and to be honest, everyone should be treated equally anyway. Plus, (s)he's said and done far more than we ever will in a very short amount of time and instead of it being settled in game she hides in WP so she can talk sh*t and c3 dec everyone for whatever reason she feels like. It's bullsh*t and when you eventually have to deal with it (she's done it to every other person who at one time defended her), then you'll know what the deal is. No one can shut anyone up in this game, that's part of the problem. Everyone wants to yap, yap, yap and the entire game becomes about who has the most time to waste instead of who has the most talent or has worked hard.

That's some bullsh*t, th
H
HORDO

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 05:33Link
WhiteBoy I don't need to do any research I saw the whole war I know you like to tell people what they can or cannot think but I have two eyes to see and I report what I saw. You are selfish andself centered enough to think what you have to say is the only thing that matters but Keto was nuked more than 50 times, it is funny how you and your crew have selective memory, nukes are pretty useless if you nuke c3s but I counted as all ketos countries that were unprotected shed more than 10 million population each I would not call that a a useless part of the game. I know what I saw I don't need some big mouth telling me different mind your business I was not talking to you. I didnt really trust the advice given me but I should have wendy was telling me the whole time to take down the air defense first I thought it was impossible waste of time but she did it all by herslef more than 140K interceptors. so it was my fault for not listening. The only tperson
H
HORDO

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 05:34Link
And I don't care for that juvenile kind of language towards a woman Whiteboy, this is a only a game you lowlife scumbag you need to grow up.
H
HORDO

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 05:36Link
I remember Jonni telling Wendy to keep the forums clean for saying "bitching" which is only decribing an action, but you keep calling her bitch and I have not witnessed a gm or moderator warn you about your language. Are there two sets of rules that apply to everyone else and Whiteboy gets to break them and live by his own? Is he exempt?
W
whiteboy (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 06:07Link
*sshole, b*tch, f*ck, b*lls, d*ck

That's all clean, there is a TV show with one of those words in the title on network TV...can't remember which one.

Deal with it, stop crying about language like a little girl.
S
Scarlet (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 06:11Link
Hey, I'm a boy. What's wrong with being a boy?
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 07:29Link
Orbiter has left war protection for 4 real countries, and is now fighting with them.

Good for him to finally put something on the line.
S
Serpent (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 07:30Link
So I assume you condemn C3 warfare?
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 08:19Link
finally? wow?

they've been out of protection. nearly the entire time.

they were out of protection when i dec'd

they were out of protection when the wars opened

after i took charity, i thought that would be the end of this event, so i put my countries into protection because i wanted a break

when i saw you demanding we leave WG... i took them out of protection. although, with torch, i over looked that one. i meant to take it out, i thought i did, but actually didn't

chryso, they were out of protection, nearly the entire time, except for torch and doom, which were merely an oversight

when i say "nearly," i mean, during this, they spent about 1 game month in protection

but go ahead, say "finally," so far 95% this has been you spinning...

and i think you can still squeeze in a few more decs on most, domino should only be able to get one more, but t
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 08:21Link
Serpent, my objection is to a larger attacker using a series of c3s while hiding in war protection when attacked a weaker opponent.

In my case, I was attacked by 4 people with combined armies 10 times my army's size. They did so while hiding in war protection. That is simply an unfair tactic.

Were the other countries not in war protection, my objections would be none or less.

Were the defender greatly outnumbered by multiple attackers, C3 warfar may sound more fair.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 08:26Link
Orbiter,

My bad. Good for you. My appologies for saying your didn't have the guts to take your countries out of war protection. I was completely focused on EC, and just assumed the others were doing the same.

So, are you still planning to leave WG if you lose?
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 08:28Link
are you if you lose?

and if you are, you should probably take your countries out of protection also
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 09:13Link
Good point, I put them there after all the wars expired on them as a sign of peace...however, it looks like the war is back on.

If we are able to negotiate the terms of a war, I'm willing to agree to leave if we have a specific agreement on relevent conditions to ensure enforcement and terms.

First, it will be necessary to know the status of the war participants on your side, such as who is going to continue the fight, who agrees to leave, who agrees to whatever terms are agreed to.

Second, it will be necessary to understand how this will be enforced.

Third, the conditions that trigger victory must be agreed upon.

Finally, there are other matters, such as agreements concerning other worlds and other players that must be addressed.

Bottom line is that all is on the table. From war to the death with loser leaving WG to peace.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 09:30Link
well, i'll send you my msn, and we can hash it out, as we have already filled this thread.

you certainly are correct, some boundaries need to be set. i mean, if we agree to this, what if a third party decides to jump in? ect...

but i'd like to leave you with this, i can only speak for myself, the seriousness of a wager of this kind... one can not speak for another.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 10:19Link
one thing i'd like to point out, with the suggested changes...

SNAPP, has declared war on my nice countries, (not complaining,)

so how ever justified any one may think that they are. for this point, i'm not saying who's in the right or wrong, many people have many opinions, the point here, is what has just happened, in relation to upcoming changes...

snapp has declared war on the #3, 4, 5, and 25 war ranked countries... not the other way around

so with suggested changes, i would be able to buy officers, and soldiers... have increased spending limits, have the "start now" button, and i would of course start each war over the next 48 hours at my convenience, my allies could counter dec, so 5 of the top 10 war slaves would, over the next 48 hours, would start one war at a time, destroying SNAPPs military countries, one by one, at our leisure...

just pointing this out.
S
Serpent (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 16:38Link
Mr Chrysostom, So then you agree with C3 warfare so long as it meets your prescribed criteria. OK I understand.
P
Psycho_Honey (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 16:41Link
Serpent c3 warfare is not okay as long as it is not your friends doing it and if it doesn't meet your prescribed criteria?

Rhetorical ...
C
chrysostom (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 17:25Link
Serpent,

22 players on White Giant have voted with their boycotts to say that the type of warfare engaged against me was wrong.

Their own federation allies on another world (who fought with them on this world recently), have critisized publically the tactics used.

The issue is not a tactic in general, the issue is how this war was conducted. I'm not speaking in abstract. Nor about rhetoric. I'm saying that the WG community objects to how this war was conducted by the attackers.

They showed a lack of honor. When they had a 10 to 1 advantage, they attacked with a bunch of C3s, and even kept C3s in war protection. These are C3s, one with 17 mil and another with 15 mil in population with 0 corporations. All military.
S
Serpent

All worlds
16 Sep 2010 22:17Link
Thats fine, all Im asking is if you condemn C3 warfare of any type? Simple question, it only requires a yes or no. Of course we all know how some others fell, like Windy! I was just curious about your thoughts.