Simcountry
Forum White Giant World War On White Giant (White Giant)

World War On White Giant (White Giant)

J
Jo Salkilld (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 21:35 Link
Do none of you play the levels game?

A DI average of 400 is required for level 14 ... how does anyone achieve that without having trillions in military assets in every country?

Does that make everyone who plays for levels a target? It would seem so ...
E
EO (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 21:43 Link
For level 14, you probably need about... 10-20t of MIB? I've been to level 14 Jo, I'm aware of what it requires. Having 10 times that much is not necessary for level 14.
J
Jo Salkilld (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 22:12 Link
EO ... are you seriously suggesting that, so long as players only have 20T or so military assets, no one will ever attack them? If you are attacked, a whole bunch of MIBs won't get you very far.

An effective defence that hits DI 400 is worth 91T ... not quite 100T, but near enough to qualify.
E
EO (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 22:17 Link
I'm saying that if you were a "levels player" you wouldn't need more than 20t military assets, and I doubt you'd find yourself being questioned. There are many players on other worlds who are "level players." I know several of them well.

Instead of spending on an effective defense, they buy wp. They don't want to fight, so they don't. You did not elect this path, and thus you are a target. I highly doubt Wendy would attack a player who had 20t mil assets if there was a player of the same caliber defense who had 100t.

I use Wendy here because it is a common reference point. Her choices are logical for someone looking to acquire assets, and yes, having less assets makes you far less of a target.

If you want to play levels and avoid war, you can buy war protection. If you do not choose to do so, then you are automatically a potential target, the same way as I am - I've been attacked before too.
I
IndustMech (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 22:19 Link
Population above 30 million is worth 3 - 5 gc per million.

60 mil pop
sell 30 mil for 3 gc each
90 gc
90 * 460 = 41400 or 41.4T

WOW more targets!
E
EO (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 22:21 Link
Yes IM. Of the 130 or so products traded in the game, about 1/3 are ammunition or weapons. War is DESIGNED to be part of the game. Targets are the logical conclusion of weapons.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 23:49 Link
lol, common, every one thats funny, it really is

"Targets are the logical conclusion of weapons." -EO

i'm going to be quoting that one for a long time
I
IndustMech (Golden Rainbow)
09 Aug 2010 00:21 Link
EO said I was a target due to the fact that I had 100T in military assets. As if that's the only thing my countries had of value. My point is that my countries are still targets because they have 60 mil pop and the population has value just like the mil assets. If you have something of value, some people will try to take it from you.
P
Psycho_Honey
09 Aug 2010 03:17 Link
EO you need to get off my nizzuts homie. Quit saying my name, you haven't earned that.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
09 Aug 2010 08:23 Link
well, i guess this war just couldn't end with out a complete nuclear beat down of some one. thanks for volunteering ian
S
Serpent (White Giant)
09 Aug 2010 09:18 Link
Well fellas, we had stopped all battles but sometimes I guess enuf just aint enuf, some still want more.

Serpent says to his massive air force : 'Hey boys, Lets kick the tires, and light the fires, time to go huntin again'!
L
Laguna
09 Aug 2010 11:24 Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Yes IM. Of the 130 or so products traded in the game, about 1/3 are ammunition or weapons. War is DESIGNED to be part of the game. Targets are the logical conclusion of weapons.<!-/Quote-!>


And who said wars had to have a victor?
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
09 Aug 2010 16:47 Link
I'm completely surprised that now Mob has done it's worst they expect no return fire. WGC naturally would want to continue, they knew this, and now will use it as an excuse to asset raid inactives and the rest of anything worth value, which was the entire original intent.

Durh, full circle 101.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
09 Aug 2010 17:01 Link
aww, wendy, if you can't be a player, don't be a player hater!!!
P
Psycho_Honey (Golden Rainbow)
09 Aug 2010 17:34 Link
Player hater?

So you attack them, and honestly don't expect them to want to fight back?

And because this seems a tad counter intuitive, I am player hating?

Josias you needs to go back to the urban dictionary a re evaluate the meaning of player hating.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
09 Aug 2010 17:49 Link
well, considering how we trounced them, you'd think that they'd rather let the hole thing fizzle out. is actually what i think would be the smart thing on their part.
E
EO (White Giant)
09 Aug 2010 18:14 Link
We expected they'd fight back BEFORE all their countries were taken instead of with c3s AFTER their fedmates had dropped out.

This is fine if they continue to pursue this policy. We will act accordingly.

@ Laguna - you find me a game where there are weapons and there is no winner/loser anywhere else.
P
Psycho_Honey (Golden Rainbow)
09 Aug 2010 18:38 Link
Some things are easier said than done. If you attacked me, my position is to attack you, regardless of what you've taken or if I can't win. This in itself is one of the last truly effective deterrents. Futile maybe, but the possibility would most certainly make an aggressor think twice, or not even attack at all. That said this is a game. People have a real problem with long drawn out wars. I think this is wrong. If you can choose to get a few buddies and cut through some cake rather quickly I should be able to wage war in whatever manner I wish. Long short drawn out or whatever. This should not be limited to what You or anyone considers morally correct. The group of players on the recieving end of what you did feel it was not morally correct as well as other players in the game. A truly effective war, involving c3s or whatever other means were necessary to mete out an appropriate revenge should always be available to victims or recipients(better said) of attacks.

I find it truly disgusting that change after proposed change made by your camp ONLY catered to exactly how you all would go about a war, and limited a respondent of possible means to respond. The changes were requested before a war like this, becuase you expected to win handily, despite the propaganda showing itself now on the forums. You confirmed this expectation with threats and ultimatums from the top of the thread that announced the war decs.

"Those of you that have been decd upon, we have chosen you for obvious reasons, the rest of you who are active players, if you don't get involved in the war then your countries will be left exactly as they are with the only caution being that if c3 wars, etc are used against us, we will turn this into a no holds barred fight. But again, knowing this, I do not think the leadership of WGC will take that path but that is indeed their choice." Whiteboy

Prime example, wouldn't you say. So change c3 wars, then change the limits of value or whatever, so if the you took enough countries they wouldn't be left with much anything of value, and literally not been allowed to attack. Or had been left with only countries large enough to suicide themselves against an already established country you guys had. So it would be futile. So systematically taking out the largest countries would basically by logistics make a retaliation impossible. And then on top of that take all c3s out of any scenario. We now have gang style tactics = win. And you lobbied for changes to be able to secure exactly that reality. Than you guys ask for say nuke defence batts to derreg after everything else. Why. Because your guys stuff offensive weapons beyond capacity and hope that nothing derregs like you can't count or something. When the nuke defense goes down, the war engine isn't working right...LoL WGC could have if they were determined or organized /prepared to nuked half of your attacking countries and got some countries to derreg to blunt the attack. But that didn't happen. And now, the logical thing for me to do if I was them is nuke your arses to snot for lack of any better resolution, but hey, that is just me.

And now the option you present is that of "after what just happened, I would just let things go"

Rather weak expectations. If they worked so long and hard to build and maintain that federation and you have basically ruined a lot of games in a very short span, why wouldn't they or anyone who cared not want to exact an appropriate response. Basically Slade is on the other thread threatening to go after MOPs countries anyway, even after Josias broke whatever perceived notion that this wasn't to be an asset raid. It seems to me that the threat is continued and you guys are kicking them while they are down, it doesn't satisfy you all to know that you have won a lopsided war, you want them to get on a knee and beg you to stop. Where I come from we got solutions for shite like that. Grind the axe till there is no metal left. If I was as member rich as WGC, I would do exactly what you don't want them to do. C3 war. I do a bunch of crap and I am just one person. Imagine what 5 or 10 or more coordinated c3 warriors could do. And basically you said you would take the gloves off but be honest, they have been off, you guys insulted and downed many people for naturally being upset, all the while throwing stones my way about me ruining peoples game. There was no honor in what you guys did, so should WGC be confined to some imaginary code of no c3 fighting. They didn't attack you , you all attacked them, and still don't seem to want to stop despite all we heard on other posts.

So basically it's like since you didn't agree that what we did was cool as hell, we'll keep going, but you knew they would react this way and planned to use it as an excuse for a continuation, I'm sure you never meant to put your feet so far in your mouths saying this wasn't an asset raid, but the public response was so overwhelming that you had to try and save some face, now onto BS excuses for raiding further inactives in the name of a grudge of an opponent who isn't even present, like not available to fight present, but like not logging in for a long time present. Yet you still somehow think they should just lay down and take it, because what exactly? Oh, cuz this was fun and you guys are saving the game.

Man I wish I had a mind like yours to see the things you see, and know the things you know, and the foresight to see how this was going to be so fun and beneficial to the game. Bring new players encourage new feds, new growth, and stifle ongoing decay(as you say) of the game. I need to see why you slapping someone in the face is the reason they should not slap you back. This logic is beautiful, where did you study this philosophy so that I may get my fill of this hidden knowledge, Josias. Of all people I didn't expect such a shallow move from you. I know how they are but you... you... you are like that Wolf in sheep's clothing we mentioned on the other threads. See I respect a bad guy for what they are, I avoid them and keep one in the chamber in case they get too close, but you...you... you might be the one to have me drop my guard and sit the gun down right before you try to strong arm rob me. That is a truly scary thought. This is why communication is down among players, and mistrust is on the rise because people like you, appear to be that kewl guy you could get on with and fed up with, and build up next to and such, and then you'd be in the fed a week later with the people taking my empire. I'm done... amazingly, I just wanna dig in some arse. I wish there were more determined individuals.

You completely and utterly disappoint me Josias, not that it means much, you are way above my grade anyway, right.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
09 Aug 2010 18:47 Link
"You completely and utterly disappoint me Josias, not that it means much, you are way above my grade anyway, right." wendy

well, wendy, i'm sorry to hear that, but i not going to even read your post, their isn't much point to it, i just saw your last line. you are going to spout off what ever you want, about what ever you, when ever you want, and do what ever you, and find what ever reason to justify it. i don't care, theirs nothing i can do about it

you are one of those people that act really tuff as you are driving by in a car, but wont stop your car to prove how tuff u are... frankly, people like that are a waste of time.

so why should i read you posts? you are a waste of time.

ttfn
josias
P
Psycho_Honey (Golden Rainbow)
09 Aug 2010 18:56 Link
Exactly the beauty of the game is such...

you can do as you want. You have done what you wanted.

I can and will do what I want.

WGC can and do what they want, they have basically nothing left to lose.

The only thing is, I am fairly certain the distinction of Bad VS Evil can be clearly made now. No more fooling people who don't "KNOW" what is really happening.

Not a single soul is going to shed a tear for any of you now...

This is indeed a great game, community rules all this spamming the gms to change that and this is all nonsense. What has happened here, and what should happen now as a result is totally in the hands of the users. I plan to be a solution to a very nasty problem. Let's see how fun it can get. I'm saving the game wooohoooo! Look at me.
S
Serpent
09 Aug 2010 19:45 Link
* It seems to me that the threat is continued and you guys are kicking them while they are down, it doesn't satisfy you all to know that you have won a lopsided war, you want them to get on a knee and beg you to stop.* quote by yappy poodle

On the second day of the war when it was apparent that there was no more fight left, we stopped attacking. I have many many more countries and military I could have used, as others do, because we expected more difficulty. Granted it didnt happen and we stopped our attacks. It has nothing to do with assets. I have far more assets than what I have gained from this war... this is only a very small percentage. The full version of this game involves war. If you dont wish to play the full version then dont.

Even after the decs on MOP were sent we decided not to attack, altho orbiter had his reasons to continue. But when more decs from wgc appeared, clarifacation was asked for, but no response.

We were willing to stop, they didnt.
D
DeathBeforeDishonor (White Giant)
31 Aug 2010 16:50 Link
Must be nice to be in a federation that commucates with one another.Ever since I've signed up with the fed I am with now,I've not recieved one message from my federation members.
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
01 Sep 2010 00:40 Link
I've never commucated lol. Hey DBD, long time no see. You proly wanna join the mob,m they plan wars and all that stuff.
R
Richard Plantagenet (White Giant)
01 Sep 2010 09:07 Link
Broken Ambitions has declared war on my empire - as seems to be the theme, this aggression was totally unprovoked. Any pressure that can be applied to help avoid this war would be very much appreciated.

In the meantime the countries will be stripped as far as possible so if you have corps in the White Rose Commonwealth you may want to move them.
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
01 Sep 2010 10:08 Link
Kill Her...

Kill Kill Kill.

I am running low on bullets or I'd really help you.