Well if you gave me 3 guesses and the first 2 don't count I'd say, War Levels.
I mean honestly, mathematically, and clearly (not including freeplayers that quit every 2 weeks which they include in their hits per day) we've lost alot of great players including LDI Jason, Serpent is trying to get rid of his countries, lots of people thinking of leaving..
My resolution is a Board of Players with ideas both good and bad Like Elite security Council, where we meet with Jozi in a chatroom and talk about things, and ppl bring their issues to those players as most keto, lorelei Blueserpent, Serpent, Myself, etc, are all very knowledgeable of things that are going on since obviously these updates are only getting ppl MSNing me better $$$ prices for their accounts..obviously, they arent helping as far as long time players sticking to help, and the players i spend MY time on in chat helping with the game ARENT staying bu
D
daniel oneill (White Giant)
All worlds
can some 1 please tell me 2 things wen u order arms dose the amount of stock it says u hav dose that include deployed weopons 2 an allso dose ammo go dwn even if ur nt at war coz iv ordered a lot more ammo than iv got could sum 1 please anser 4 me as no1 seems 2 anser these things id b very greatfull thank u in advance
Mr. daniel oneill
When weapons and ammo are deployed, either in units or garrisons, those weapons and ammo no longer appear in your country stock. Also, when you have units or garrisons they use a small amount of ammo as 'practice' ammo per game month.
B
Billy_Bob_Joe_Bob_Steve (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
How about we organize several world wars? Maybe if we show them that we can overcome their war level BS, they'll finally get rid of it. Here's what I'm thinking: on each planet, we create several mega-federations, with at least 20 members. We make 3-5 of these mega-feds, and have everybody sign the war treaty. They all get their war levels up to three or four, then turn off protection. One country declares on another, the war treaties go into effect, and the more experienced members who have nukes turn the game into five radioactive dustballs.
J
Jo Salkilld (White Giant)
All worlds
That's more likely to prove to the GMs that war levels work and persuade them to retain the concept, than anything else.
Hugs and respect
Jo
J
Josias (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
jo, are you for or against WL? i'm confused, i've seen your speak out against it, but really wl are in your favor
B
Billy_Bob_Joe_Bob_Steve (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
From what I've heard, war levels were created in the aftermath of a world war to prevent it from happening again. If we can show them that they were wrong, then they might finally collapse to general consensus.
J
Jo Salkilld (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
No, Josias, I'm not in favour of war levels. They have killed the war game completely.
I appreciate what the GMs were trying to do when they brought them in, but implementing war levels wasn't the best way to achieve it. I was playing this game before Secure Mode was thought of and, in my experience, it was a lot more fun then! I don't know why you think WLs are in my favour - I've never been a purely econ player and I'm missing the war game as much as the next person.
The knock-on effect of war levels is that they have marginalised federations and the war game. There are better ways of protecting new and econ-only players and I hope the GMs will rethink.
Hugs and respect
Jo
J
James the fair (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
I think as soon as you own and get to at least 5 countries, there definitely should not be any war restrictions whatsoever. Also I think fighting C3 countries is getting much harder ever since they introduced the damn war levels. The higher your war level is, the harder the C3s become, I can't expand my empire fast like I want to, its just ludicrious.
J
Josias (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
james, the c3 aspect of war levels is GREAT, that is, once you learn how to c3 raid.
jo, in an effort to not re-open old wounds, i'll leave some of what you said, alone. but you are right, war levels not only dimish feds, but nearly eliminate the political game.
the flavor of Sim Country has changed. its still fun, but the depth of the game has gone. its allot like when Coca-cola came out with "new coke," it was suppose to be so much better, but people hated it, and finally we got "classic coke," war levels have taken away way too much of what made this game great. give us back classic SC
J
Jo Salkilld (White Giant)
All worlds
I agree, Josias. The C3 aspect of levels is a very good idea. The PvP version not so.
The best way of convincing the GMs to go back to 'classic' Simcountry is if the players come up with better viable alternatives, which achieve what the GMs wanted to achieve, but more so and without the negative effects that WLs have imposed.
Hugs and respect
Jo
M
Maestro2000 (White Giant)
All worlds
I an an econ only player and like war levels.
Sorry to hear war levels has "marginalised" the federation part of the game. @jo
Perhaps as I suggested many times before only players at war level 3 or higher should be allowed into a federation. The number one function of a federation is mutual protection of it's members. How can you allow a war level 0, 1 or 2 player into a federation when it can't protect you? Not right.
And make all worlds a war world over a certain level. Go ahead warmongers and knock yourselves out.