Z
Zeta (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
14 Jul 2008 00:37Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:The Protectorate is a long-standing alliance of nations and empires, with a rich history spanning centuries. Its basic laws revolve around loyalty, honour and friendship. I've never played a game with a better group of people.<!-/Quote-!>
The former Chairwoman told me that when I first asked her about the game, and what she found so enthralling about it. The Protectorate's aims are not much different from that today.
Loyalty, honour and friendship.
The Protectorate - Directives:
1. No member of The Protectorate shall attack an ally.
2. No member of The Protectorate shall attack another nation without prior approval from the Government.
3. All members of The Protectorate shall remain as active as they can.
Today is the beginning of our rennaissance. This federation will be great again.
But, to become great, we ne
E
ebby247 (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
18 Jul 2008 13:51Link
The Protectorate is reasserting its leadership on the KB stage. We have several powerful and active new member with several of our members in the top ten. Also, with the appointment of California to the security council we now have two members on the security council.
Long live The Protectorate
Long live The Protectorate
D
deadman101 (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
14 Jan 2009 21:44Link
I'm a small new country on KB who should i talk to if I can join?
B
Billy_Bob_Joe_Bob_Steve (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
05 Apr 2011 23:55Link
About attacking other nations, does that also apply to C3s?
C
Crafty (Fearless Blue)
All worlds
06 Apr 2011 00:06Link
Jeez Billybob, you digging up some OLD bones there bud.
The Protectorate is still running and currently expanding selectively under the wise Chair of Parsifal, a very senior player in the game.
No, attacking C3s is not a problem to the federation unless of course you are surrounding and potentially threatening a non fed member in which case your motives would come under srutiny.
If you would like more info on the fed, we have a training branch for new members or the main branch which Parsifal controls, then contact Parsifal at 'Knights of the round table'.
Long live the Protectorate.
The Protectorate is still running and currently expanding selectively under the wise Chair of Parsifal, a very senior player in the game.
No, attacking C3s is not a problem to the federation unless of course you are surrounding and potentially threatening a non fed member in which case your motives would come under srutiny.
If you would like more info on the fed, we have a training branch for new members or the main branch which Parsifal controls, then contact Parsifal at 'Knights of the round table'.
Long live the Protectorate.
S
Sunny (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
26 May 2011 18:45Link
Huzzah!
S
shave1 (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
02 Jun 2011 23:36Link
hello!, my name is Shave, a new member to this Federation. just wanted to drop by and introduce myself!
C
Crafty (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
03 Jun 2011 19:47Link
Welcome Shave. Please drop by the fed forum when you can, and any help you need - thats what we are here for.
Crafty (CC)
Crafty (CC)
S
Solaris (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
03 Jun 2011 20:39Link
Parsifal has kindly sent me an invitation, but it isn't showing due to a glitch which Tom knows about and so I cannot join yet.
At least I can visit the forum and sign up.
Long live the Protectorate.
At least I can visit the forum and sign up.
Long live the Protectorate.
B
Border C
All worlds
26 Jun 2011 00:13Link
Smells like old people in here....
C
Crafty (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
26 Jun 2011 23:14Link
As old as those 70's flares and tank top you favour.
V
Vladimir Lenin (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
26 Jun 2011 23:40Link
Quite frankly, it seems like you guys don't value freedom very much..."No member of the Protectorate shall attack another nation without prior approval from the government." I'll tell you something; I will *not* obey anyone who tells me who I can and can't attack, or thinks that they can command me in any way.
This is just how it appears to me, but somebody correct me if I am wrong.
This is just how it appears to me, but somebody correct me if I am wrong.
S
Solaris (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
26 Jun 2011 23:49Link
Some Federations have a code of honour and some don't. Any player wishing to join an honourable Federation would do well to abide by its code of conduct or they may find themselves voted out and possibly the victim of multiple declarations as a result thereof.
V
Vladimir Lenin (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
26 Jun 2011 23:52Link
Then I was correct. No freedom.
S
Solaris (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 00:00Link
Freedom alone will not rebuild your empire if it has been decimated by those who believed they had an honourable member within their ranks. Ergo freedom isn't everything.
S
Scarlet (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 05:02Link
In any voluntary organization, the existence of a code of conduct does not limit freedom in any meaningful way. A code of conduct is merely a contractual obligation voluntarily agreed upon. If you don't accept, then you remain free as long as the option to leave peacefully still exists.
C
Crafty (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 12:02Link
Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose.
S
Solaris (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 13:51Link
Vlad, freedom must often be sacrificed in favour of unity.
Why should a Federation such as The Protectorate who seek to protect its membership in the event of hostile attack allow free reign to any member to do as they please?
How would you feel if the empire you had invested so much in to build was taken from you by a strong Federation which had been riled by a reckless warmonger who had displayed no respect for the rules to which they had previously agreed to honour?
In a similar vein to Scarlet's comment, if you don't like what a Federation represents, then don't join it and don't criticise it as any and every Federation is free to choose its own rules and its own philosophy, just as you are free to apply for membership to any Federation you see fit to join or to create your own.
Why should a Federation such as The Protectorate who seek to protect its membership in the event of hostile attack allow free reign to any member to do as they please?
How would you feel if the empire you had invested so much in to build was taken from you by a strong Federation which had been riled by a reckless warmonger who had displayed no respect for the rules to which they had previously agreed to honour?
In a similar vein to Scarlet's comment, if you don't like what a Federation represents, then don't join it and don't criticise it as any and every Federation is free to choose its own rules and its own philosophy, just as you are free to apply for membership to any Federation you see fit to join or to create your own.
J
Josias (Fearless Blue)
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 14:21Link
even the most aggressive feds are restrictive of who and when you can attack, the point being made here, is no one wants to be drug into a loosing fed war, because of a hot head.
C
Crafty (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 18:45Link
And Vlad, it says without approval, so all you have to do is give the fed your reasons and providing you're not being an ass, there would be no problem in you attacking. Also you are probably thinking this 'rule' applies to attacking C3's... it doesn't.
@Josias, drug? who has the drugs?
@Josias, drug? who has the drugs?
J
Josias
All worlds
27 Jun 2011 20:13Link
crafty, i wish i knew
B
Billy_Bob_Joe_Bob_Steve (Kebir Blue)
All worlds
28 Jun 2011 08:07Link
THE PROTECTORATE WILL FALL TO THE UNSTOPPABLE MIGHT OF THE SOVIET FEDERATION! ONWARDS, OUTWARDS AND UPWARDS!
S
Scarlet (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
28 Jun 2011 14:43Link
I have my doubts.
J
James the fair (Little Upsilon)
All worlds
28 Jun 2011 15:42Link
Its those who are the most powerful in the world who truly has freedom, Vladimir's right, this federation uses the word freedom when its not free as an excuse to control others. So if you're a weak player you'll never be free.
S
Scarlet (Golden Rainbow)
All worlds
28 Jun 2011 16:23Link
Freedom is only the absence of coercion.