Simcountry
Forum General Best suggestion i will ever make. You Decide (Fearless Blue)

Best suggestion i will ever make. You Decide (Fearless Blue)

Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 09:07Link
Please stop automatic cash tranfers to corporations. Can there be a way to turn this off and on and control the level at which cash leaves countries and enterprises and into corporations. If a business is losing money why put more money into it why not let it close or close it yourself. I hate dumping T's into losing corps. Tell me what you think, should they add more options to automatic cash transfers to corps, i know for sure we all dump money into this area of the game, and it may even be our biggest waste expense.
D
Dave (Kebir Blue)

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 12:59Link
Agreed or at least tell us which is the 'leakey' corporation I hate seeing a transfer on my expense report and then have to go through each company to see who got it
M
Maestro2000

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 14:42Link
agreed
T
Tom Willard

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 17:29Link
Before the automatic cash transfers, people lost corporations that bankrupted while they were not looking, or they complained about corporate loans they did not ask for.

what you can do:

check the profit & loss page on the corporations page (shows all corporations, their cash and profit or loss.)
Close all the money losing corporations (These are your leaking corporations) and all transfers will stop.
You can also check last year profit & loss on the page of the corporation).

As long as you have corporations that make large losses, long term, you will need cash to support them.

Not transferring the cash does not solve the need for cash, it just drives these corporations into bankruptcy.
S
Solaris (Kebir Blue)

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 20:17Link
I have an enterprise comprised solely of electric power corps, most of which are fully upgraded and they are all profitable, yet billions are transferred into them which is nullifying its overall profit. I cannot figure out why this is. The same is happening in other enterprises which have a mixture of corps. This is of less concern as some corps post regular losses.

If I closed all leaking corporations, I dread to think how few corps, if any, would be left.
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 20:25Link
I would rather have them go bankrupt and pay of the loans than paying into a losing corps forever and ever, corps are made to go bankrupt, can you at least give us the option of turning this on and off. There should be an option page of truning on or off cash transfer for each corp or all in general this way you can keep money losing corps you want and let money losing corps you dont want tgo bankrupt. By giving us the option it would make enterprises not have to spend T's of their money into unprofitable corps they do not want. I would like to see them close and go bankrupt and yes i would pay of those loans than see cash transfers of 350B each game month. Sooner or later the closed banrupt corps would be gone and only profitable corps ould remain, but please with an option to turn this on and off for each corp or all in general it would make it better for those of us who want it or do not want it.
S
SirSmokesAlot (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 20:35Link
I agree with Q.
T
Tom Willard

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 20:50Link
I looked at the spark enterprise on KB.
All electric power companies.

Most of the corporations are making losses, some are profitable. Check for yourself, most are losers.
As a result, the entire enterprise is making a loss, not a profit and of course, some cash is transferred.

many corporations do not sell all their products because of the trade strategy. the offering price is too high. reduce the offering price and they will sell more quickly (there is a shortage on the market) and more corporations will become profitable.

If at some time, electric power will be in oversupply, this enterprise will collapse.

moving cash into the corporation, does not have an influence on the profit. moving cash has an influence on the value of the corporation. It does not represent income or cost for the corporation.

the cash is moved in because the corporations are losing money and might need loans or bankrupt.
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
15 Sep 2011 23:05Link
Tom i understand your point of moving in cash to stop if from getting loans and going bankrupt, but for some of us and i would rather it get loans and than go bankrupt than continuing to give a corporation money for a finite amount of time until not even the cash infusions help. Currently i just gave a record amount of cash trasnfers of not of my own doing of 350B last game month for my enterprise to corporations i have no idea it went to, what if i no longer want those corps to continue to take my cash why not let them take out loans, go bankrupt, or if i see them with loans i my self will pay for it and close it, at least with the option or turning it on and off we can choose which companies to save and which ones we do not want to save.
C
Crafty (Kebir Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 00:07Link
Q, like Tom says, your best bet is to look at the profit/loss page for all corps. From this you can also sort of tell which corps need a little attention (low cash levels), which corps are v.good and generally get the idea of how your trade strats are working as you can judge spikes of good sales and no sales.
D
David Walker (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 00:41Link
I like the automatic cash transfer feature and would not turn it off if I had the choice, but I certainly won't object to anyone asking to have a choice.
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 01:07Link
Craft i get your point of that also, than i have the best solution for both points, give me a page where i can IPO my corps if they are able and i can IPO them all at once like in my last poll so that i no longer have to send cash to them and can raise it on the open market.
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 01:09Link
Also craft its not just me but others, Maestro, solaris and sirsmokesalot, if i put this to a vote on the poll vote page i bet 39/4 would say yes to an option for this. Look im not saying get rid of the feature but at least give us an option of sending money to certain companies we choose or do not choose. Options are great, no options make it bad.
C
Crafty (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 02:17Link
Yeah fine, like David Walker said no problem in having a choice. I just like to look for ways around things, and was offering the benefit of my experience is all. Good luck.
L
Laguna

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 09:29Link
1. Turn it off;
2. Make it optional;
3. Make it exclusive to national corps.
K
Kolenski (White Giant)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 16:57Link
Turn it off or make it optional
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 18:16Link
I like lagunas idea, but see, there is strong support for this idea becuase some of us dump T's into these falling corps when they should just fall and go bankrupt.
T
Tom Willard

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 18:32Link
Letting corporations bankrupt is not a very good idea.

The outstanding loans are inherited by the owner (the country or enterprise).
You don't want them to bankrupt. You should check their profit/loss and loans on the pages that show all corporations at once.
You should then decide which ones you want to keep and which ones you want to close.
Checking why they make losses is also an idea you might consider.
It could be that salaries are very high while market price for the product is down (temporarily). or they might not have the workers they need or the raw materials.

Once you decide that some corporations can not have a profitable future, close them directly before they go bankrupt and leave you with more loans.

The money they might have (automatic transfers) is also inherited by the owner.
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 20:26Link
Okay Tom i Think i see a way to save some value out of these corps, are you saying that if i close the really losing corps and they still as of yet have no loans and i close them i will keep any remaining cash they have in the corp.
Q
Quetzalcoatl (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 20:27Link
Also why not have the option it could be fun supporting national industries and setting the cash we want to be transfered in or out each month.
T
Tom Willard

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 20:53Link
cash is then moved to the owner.
Loans, if the corporation has some, too.

The automation is made for people who do not want to go into these corporations and fix them manually.

if you do want to intervene, why another feature?
go to the cash management page. it shows all the corporations, and their cash positions and you can move cash in or out of all your corporations at once, with a single click.

also, after cash is moved in automatically, you can go to this page and take all the cash the corporations have back out with the same single click.

You can also pay back all their loans at once, give them some cash and no automatic transfers will be needed for a long time.
L
Laguna

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 20:58Link
So instead of letting unsuccessful corps fail, you prefer to have unsuccessful corps drag a country and enterprise even faster to bankruptcy?

The only reason this was implemented was due to order issues problems related with shuttle corps and bankrupted nuclear corps. That was only thing that should have been fixed. We do not care if other corps get closed. And if we there's any temporary problem we care about, we transfer money manually instead.

We asked for those issues to be solved and now we are asking for this to stop. At least we want the option to decide which corps get help and those who don't.
T
Tom Willard

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 21:05Link
This feature had nothing to do with one type of corporation or another.
it was created to reduce the huge numbers of small loans in 400.000 corporations and luckily, it is all gone now. The loans are concentrated in the countries and enterprises and even there, declining.

This whole thing is quite trivial as cash can be moved in and out very easily at all time and such cash movements have no implications what so ever to profits and no consequences to the decisions by presidents and CEOs as to which corporations should be closed.
O
Orbiter (Fearless Blue)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 21:10Link
maybe nothing really has to change, and instead, put a special icon next to any corp that has had a loss for over a single year...

looking through 500 corps, to find the ones you want to get rid of, is, well, i don't want to. manually transferring in cash every day, i also don't want to do that. i also don't want to keep hemeraging money into looser corps. but any corp can loose money, any given month. so i can use the "profit, cash, and debt," screen to notice the ones that are loosing money. but i'd have to click on the graph, or open every corp to figure out whether its continually loosing money...

i think that the intention here, can be reached, just by putting a special icon next to any corp that has lost money for over a year, or 5 years... what ever. that way, looser corps can be easily identified, rather than pooring through literally thousands of corps... and avoiding having to manually put cash in
D
David Walker (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
16 Sep 2011 21:17Link
This thread to be getting slightly confused. On the whole, I'm on Tom's side and if I set up a corporation, I want to be the one to close it and not the automation settings, whether it requires cash subsidy or not.

I'm perfectly happy with current automatic cash transfers as corporation closing was a problem for a number of years.

The issue is solely to do with the ability to switch a feature on or off (possibly for each corporation) and not the benefits or negatives of a particular strategic decision.