Simcountry
Forum Little Upsilon Market Analysis (Little Upsilon)

Market Analysis (Little Upsilon)

B
Barney Rubble (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 02:24 Link
I would like to take this time to ask the econ sided players to consider for a moment how the perpetual state of war on LU has either positively or negatively impacted profits and the macro-economy of LU over all.

Too often we hear about how dysfunctional the war like players are, or may be, but I suspect that over the last few months many players have reaped very healthy profits...


Thoughts?
S
Stuart Taylor (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 02:27 Link
Barney, to be honest; A lot of my corps are making healthy profits at the moment. I do not have many weapons corps (and those I do are contracted to myself!), but my construction corps are making a killing due to the rebuild costs.
A
Aleksander (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 02:32 Link
I am a new player with a CEO with almost 400 ammo corps. I am selling at market +60% and doing very well, especially the first part of December.
K
Keith Allaire (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 03:29 Link
My CEOs are reaping the profits of selling ammo at nearly 400% market price (60 above quality); they have probably nearly a couple hundred ammo corps between them.

My countries are stockpiling military hardware at 100 quality. I'm saving myself a boatload, and my CEOs are making a boatload, by taking advantage of the quality spread.

I can say that the current turmoil has me working towards level 6, which I never would have considered attempting three months ago.
F
FarmerBob (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 10:56 Link
WOAR is great for business. Keep it up, Barney. ;)
M
Martock (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 17:35 Link
Even my VWL CEO has been making a killing by selling ammo at 100 above quality...not sure what that really makes out to in terms of % over market price but I've had a few RL weeks where I'd pull over $10T at a time.

Besides Barney, how is it any real difference from RL?
W
Wendy (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 20:01 Link
Why are we thanking barney, in thoery that would be correct as he provoked me several times. LDI has repeatedly called for surrender to end the conflict.

The perpetual war is not their will, they want it to end. I don't think the responses that were positive is what they were looking for. He proly was looking for negative responses to garner public opinion for an end to it.

The only negative i would say is the nuclear fallout is the only issue i could bring up, but LDI is doing the nuking.
J
John R
21 Dec 2008 23:32 Link
Your conflict isn't making even as much as even a mosquito bite on the economy. Whether you were to continue or to cease completely, things would be no different.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 23:48 Link
You mean the universe does not revolve around Windy?

My god this is groundbreaking.

So in fact she is a n00b who's opinion does not matter and her continued beatings, ridicule, and humiliation are simply consequences for her poor communal behavior.
J
John R
21 Dec 2008 23:52 Link
Nor does it revolve around the need for you to hurl snide remarks at Wendy at every chance you have.

You too have two weeks to change your ways on this forum.
J
jason (Little Upsilon)
21 Dec 2008 23:56 Link
humm I must remember to nuke her more.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 00:01 Link
It is more of a visceral response than a need.

Need or desire signifies involvement.

I have no involvement only a detached sense of curiosity.

Thus while I can change my responses I see no need to do so unless the external stimuli I apply to her bad behavior has the desired response.
J
John R
22 Dec 2008 00:05 Link
/me looks for Wendy on this thread

No Wendy and you claim response? Try again.
Even if it was, would it change the nature of your snide remarks? No, it would not.

Understanding and accepting are two different things.

You will change your responses because I am telling you to. And unfortunately for you, I operate both the stimulus and the response.

Correct your behaviour.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 00:08 Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Wendy (Little Upsilon)
Sunday, December 21, 2008 - 08:01 pm Click here to edit this post Why are we thanking barney...et al<!-/Quote-!>

J
John R
22 Dec 2008 00:10 Link
And if that triggers a snide remark from your behalf, you are the one at the wrong.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 00:10 Link
I will let you work the stick and watch for the desired response.
J
John R
22 Dec 2008 00:11 Link
You have 12 hours to shows us the fruits of your reflection.
P
Pluto (Golden Rainbow)
22 Dec 2008 00:17 Link
/me shakes head at the lack of Unbias
J
jason (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 00:23 Link
ok back to the topic. I think the war has positively impacted profits on lu. at least for me.

:)
T
The Wise One (White Giant)
22 Dec 2008 01:22 Link
WTF? Why is everyone in ban mode lately? T gets banned. Now it has opened up the gauntlet for many more to come?

I see no purpose in this.
G
General G (Fearless Blue)
22 Dec 2008 01:45 Link
I disagree. Theres been nothing but BULLSHIT on the forums since ive rejoined. War protection/secured mode is to blame for that I think.
J
John R
22 Dec 2008 01:46 Link
The purpose of suspending someone is to avoid banning.
W
Wendy (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 02:34 Link
Muahahaaahaaa
K
Keith Allaire (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 02:41 Link
Wendy, rejoicing at Sam getting warned to calm down is uncalled for, especially considering you received the same warning in another thread.
I
Illo 0210 (Little Upsilon)
22 Dec 2008 03:07 Link
I will give you the list...

Wendy

Sam

Barney

Jason

Capone

Dirt

We all need 30 days in the "cooler" laguna.

make it happen

-B