Simcountry
Forum Little Upsilon Market Analysis (Little Upsilon)

Market Analysis (Little Upsilon)

S
Stuart Taylor (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 03:14Link
Yeah. do that then the forum will be dead.
W
Wendy (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 05:06Link
Keith, do yourself a favor and be quiet. Thx.

Muahahhaaaaa <==== is a random quote that was generated by my "Random Quote Generator v1.2.08" my recent programming project.
I
Illo 0210 (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 17:13Link
Give stu 30 days in the "hole" as well.
J
John L (Golden Rainbow)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 17:26Link
Illo 0210,
Barney! Why the name change?
I
Illo 0210 (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 17:33Link
I'm being "covert."
D
Darke Katt

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 17:39Link
Laguna, your overzealous wielding of the banhammer for what amounts ultimately to minor offences is both unsettling and highly dissapointing. No profanity, no real offensive content beyond snide comments. You are becoming as bad as Tom in so far as stroking your ego is concerned.

I had come to expect so much better from you.
M
Maxwell (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 17:45Link
Muahahhaaaaa <==== is a random quote that was generated by my "Random Quote Generator

You guys have random quote generators?

Where can I get a random quote generator?

Do I need a random quote generator?
C
Capone

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 18:36Link
You need a random quote generator to come up with 'Muahahahahahah'? Damn, that's sad.
T
The Wise One (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 19:35Link
Jesus H Christ.

What the hell is going on? Laguna speaks out publicly against Treasurer's BAN (no it was not a suspension) and then decides to pull a 180 and ban a player for expressing an opinion?

Laguna went on the record stating he didn't agree with bannings such as the one handed down on Treasurer, yet he is so quick to wield his banhammer because his feelings were hurt?

Seems quite HYPOCRITICAL to me.
Q
quaxocal (Golden Rainbow)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 19:43Link
Wow, what did Johannas do to deserve a suspension???

John R, I think you should not let your personal bias against LDI members get in the way of doing your job properly.

DarkeKatt said it best, I had come to expect so much better from you too.

This is MUCH worse than what was done to Treasurer.
J
John R

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 20:07Link
Yes, Wendy, muahahaaahaaa to you too.

Allaire makes a fair point; he does, in practice, help you and you slap him. It's perfectly reasonable.


To ban six people without warning or minimum justification, even if sum of all their posts in the past four months would deserve such a treatment, isn't my way.

I'm glad you are at least aware something is wrong, Barney.


The post or sentence I refer when giving my warning amounts to the symbological example of all the painful annoyance the users of this forum have been suffering for four months. If you are unable to perceive this or feel compassion towards the users of this forum, Klarina, then that is a problem you will have to resolve on your own.

I have calmly read the complaints and view from afar all of the sadistic conflicts being fought on this forum, as opposed of being resolved in-game, in hope that in the end you would all be able to r
J
John R

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 20:13Link
Instead of taking wild, insane and erroneous guesses as to what and why I'm doing this, read what I write.

What precisely is hypocritical to you, Treasurer?

Oh, and I did get Willard to revise your ban, by the way, but the decision is always his and of the other staff to make.

I did not ban anyone. I suspended Sam Houston for... 1 hour? Distorting facts isn't a nice thing to do.

I have no bias towards anyone or anything. If I had any negative bias towards anyone on this game, I would have already removed him.

You all, on the other hand, do. I did the same exact thing to Wendy, and none of you did anything. Your deeds - actually, words, for this matter - don't even come close to your words.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 20:20Link
I was suspended. Now I am back. Do not blame Laguna. Its not like he cut my leg off.


The problem is there is no in game resolution.

And I refuse to tolerate her bad behavior.

All the other issues you speak of come from this one source.

I am forced to flame.

Find me another solution and I will gladly try it.
W
Wendy (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 20:43Link
You could "surrender"?

Try that.
J
jason (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 21:03Link
We will not take a surrender from you windy.
T
The Wise One (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 21:18Link
I was not distorting but raising the similarities of bannings for what amounts to nothing but people venting off steam like what Treasurer did as well. Sam was venting. Dan was venting.

The original intent of the bans was to punish those that were using this forum as a soapbox to spew hate using ant-semitism, profane language, sexism, and racism for their transgressions and to protect the users of this forum from having to be exposed to such behaviors.

The fact remains that the banhammer is being called into battle much more frequently and for reasons other than it's original intent.

It used to be that we settled all of our differences on the battlefield. With the advent of secured mode those days are long gone.Now anyone may stir up trouble and poke and prod whomever they like while they hide behind their war protection. these forums have aided in the hate that is prevalent in this game by allowing them to hit and run.
J
John R

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 21:38Link
Right now, Wendy, you can start by lowering your pride, hostility and not snipe every chance you have to hurl a rock at Sam.


After 20 hours you come to me and basically throw all of the blame on one person? And think of no alternative to your current?
Are you enjoying the current state of things?

It is impossible for one sole person be the blame for all the bullshit, as General G stated, in the forum.
Removing who annoys or removing who is annoyed would stop this, but nothing is that simple.


None of you is forced to verbally or virtually act. You have more options than you think. I am cutting them to the socially acceptable though. The most reasonable of all would be to keep your public spouts centralized in place and confine them in time - less slapping, all in one place followed by nice, long periods of no-slapping.
Seems easier than getting to accept or ignore the other.

To point out, I shouldn
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Golden Rainbow)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 22:10Link
It is that simple to place the blame on the person who created the current situation by design. My blame is in reacting to provocation not in its creation or continued execution.

The suggestion to ignore or tolerate is not valid when the other person seeks out conflict on every possible level. That is called appeasement and it never works.

The migration from IRC to regular chat was for the purposes of trolling.

The incessant rants on the forums are for the purposes of trolling.

The inability to get along with anyone is for the purposes of trolling.

Her racism was aplogized for by you and the management as acceptable thus she will continue to do and say exactly what is required to provoke hostility.

So we have no resolution.
J
John R

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 22:41Link
By being a puppet to every action and by blaming everything on just one person, you are basically saying you have no will.

None of that changes that the sum of all of have posted in the past four month is negative, as well.
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 23:09Link
I agree. It is negative.

But we have no alternative that has not been tried.
W
Webspinner (White Giant)

All worlds
22 Dec 2008 23:54Link
We have secured mode to thank for not having any recourse.
P
Pluto

All worlds
23 Dec 2008 00:29Link
/me shakes head again
W
Wendy (Golden Rainbow)

All worlds
23 Dec 2008 01:52Link
"agree. It is negative.

But we have no alternative that has not been tried."

You "Could" surrender,

Haven't tried that yet. Try it.

I went from IRC to regular chat, becuase you all keep crying to the admins, LG, iki-ryo, James/Tamara, and Genie, for ban spam, and no one really cares because they all know you are just as much to blame as me. But to be pulled aside by Genie, and iki, and have "pep-talks which amount to "I will never hear the end of the crying<=== if I don't say something, so I am saying it to you, Wendy" kind of talks is BS. If you don't provoke and be over disrespectful it won't be returned to you. Do not dish it and you would n't have to take it. Simple I think. Indeed, SIMPLE.

I returned to IRC because the SC chat is SUPER UNSTABLE and its redundant to log on 5 times in ten minutes. So when i need to have a convo directly w/o interruptions
J
Johanas Bilderburg (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
23 Dec 2008 03:48Link
I don't hate you. That would involve knowing you or caring about your opinions, thoughts, and feelings.

I refuse to tolerate your bullshit. I refuse to tolerate your racism. Its very simple. Act in a reasonable manner and you will be treated reasonably.

Act like a troll and you will be treated as such.

Other than that we have nothing to say to each other so step.
I
Illo 0210 (Little Upsilon)

All worlds
23 Dec 2008 07:31Link
Has it REALLY been 4 months!?