Both cash distributions that are non existent for public corporations, and the purchasing of materials do not reduce the corporate profits.
Cash distributions in other types of corporations are not corporate cost like salaries. These cash payments reduce the assets of the company, like taxes do. They have nothing to do with profits/net profits.
The purchasing of materials does not even reduce the corporate assets.
There is nothing showing that the cash reduction is a cash distribution.
the only distribution of cash by a public corporations is the payment of dividends.
If it was a cash distribution, you would see a jump of cash in the country or enterprise that owns most of the shares.
The only mechanism we have to pay cash to the owners of a public corporation is dividends. There is no other way.
We explicitly programmed cash transfers to the owner, for state corporations and private corporations.
These corporations have an owner and cash can be moved, in or out.
we did not call them dividends because they go to one single owner.
There are more possible reasons for a large cash drop.
One is as I said before, the purchasing of raw materials.
Another is a change in tax percentages that can cause a back payment.
This can create a big difference between profit and net profit.
It can also happen because of a recalculation at the end of the year, concluding that not enough tax was paid.
Also by a sudden drop in sales during a single month due to lack of materials.
If you see any public corporation showing cash movements on its page, in or out, please let me know where you see it.
You will see that all these pages show cash movement fields as zero.

